this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
633 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11240 readers
1722 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 53 points 5 months ago

91.3k as of the time it was screenshat. I think she might've found out. Maybe.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Op thinks their mom isn't still a hoe.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] DakRalter@thelemmy.club 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I met her once. I didn't even recognise her until I had to ask for ID (American tourists never sign their credit cards). And then I was like, oh. It's Monica Lewinsky.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

sign my credit card? why tf would I sign my credit card?

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why would you not sign it and then use signing as a method of verification?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have never in my life needed to use a credit card signature as verification

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

places that don't use chip & pin are wild

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone -2 points 5 months ago

Those places don't exist

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

There are places that ask for it, and it was common before also, at least in the US. Are you perhaps on the younger side, or haven't been much in the US about..m 10 to 15 years ago? That's when I had the most signature confirming type stuff, with some places not accepting a card that wasn't signed (usually smaller shops that didn't have a customer facing POS device, or offline CC stuff, which occasionally happened at places like Cons).

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you upload your signature when you shop online?

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I've had to fill out a few forms requiring signatures at work and am rarely asked to provide a physical copy. I don't always have the means to use the "something I have and something I know" method and printing something, signing it and rescanning it back is just tedious.

Instead, either Adobe or OSX - I'm not sure which - offers to generate a signature for you. Signatures don't really have inherent value anyway, but I think it's funny that this is even more meaningless since the system is just generating what it thinks yours should be. Also, I haven't really experimented but I would be surprised if the signature is unique.

You can sign with a mouse or touchpad but those results always look less like my actual signature than the generated one does.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, signature-based security is good in theory but is obviously heavily flawed.

When i have to "sign" online documents all I'm required to do is click a checkbox. lol

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

My first day at a job where I had to send a lot of legal letters, they showed us how to scan a signature in and make a transparent template of it to use on the computer. The attorneys I worked with all acknowledged that while it wouldn’t be a good idea to attach it to any threats or anything, the e-signature probably wouldn’t actually stand up in court as a real signature. And yet, we all still learned and used those signatures on all of our letters.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My photo ID is harder to fake than my signature, and I signed my ID, so if someone really needs to confirm my signature specifically, that’s already covered.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

To help prevent fraud. It takes like two seconds.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If that was actually the case it would help prevent fraud to leave it unsigned because it would be two-factor auth.

But in reality ive never been IDd for not having it signed.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How would it help to leave it unsigned?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So they'll check your ID to make sure the names match.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've seen a few people write "please see ID" or similar in the signature field. I've also seen many cashiers either not check the signature at all, or do so entirely performatively (IE, not trying to match the signatures or, in the case I described above, not looking closely enough to see that the payer has requested extra diligence).

Also, a lot of places I've been no longer ask for a signature under a certain cost. At one store around here, the machine prompts for a signature, but unless I proactively start it, the merchant just swipes a line across the screen with their finger.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Yep, I've seen the same on all accounts. Yet we'll be the ones that deal with any consequences that come up if anything ever happened.

At least it's easy to lock a lost card.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

kind of missing the point by not explaining how it prevents fraud

I've never needed to show my card signature for anything. ever. I'm not even sure when that would be helpful

my cc has a code to use it via chip. online usage doesn't require the signature. giving cc details via phone obviously doesn't involve a visible signature. when would it ever be relevant?

[–] DakRalter@thelemmy.club 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In the UK it's a thing. Especially if you don't have chip and pin. If you don't have a signature, we don't take payment unless you have photo ID with the same name. We're not paid enough to risk a jail sentence for putting through a stolen card.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Leave it unsigned for the two-factor authentication. 👌

[–] DakRalter@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 months ago

But if someone takes your card and there's no signature, the thief can just put their own signature.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Monica Lewinsky wasn't "sleeping with her boss" she was manipulated into performing sexual favors by her boss, the most powerful man on earth at the time. This is victim blaming.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 52 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is a bullshit take that Monika Lewinsky denies even now

This was a mutual relationship, mutual on all levels, right from the way it started and all the way through.

If you can make a criticism it's that Clinton blamed the whole thing on her being a seductive harlot including in his book after the presidency. But you certainly can't just decide she's a victim in a sexual relationship because you feel like it's true, that's the opposite of believe women and you're undermining her agency

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Lewinsky

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How do you dress like Monica Lewinsky?

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Blue dress with a stain on it, I expect.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Possibly also a fat suit (she was fatter back then) and a brunette wig.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Everyone else was skinnier too. I saw an episode of Seinfeld a couple years ago where Elaine’s being weird about an overweight coworker. She really talks up how fat the coworker is and then it cuts to someone who appears to be about 130 lbs on a 5’4” frame. Like, she probably had a slight muffin top, but she didn’t look unhealthy or even noticeably thick to me, just not actively skinny.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

Plot twist: They were both single, consenting adults at the time.

(I'm on about OP's mam and the boss for those that need literally everything explained to them.)

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why are people going around telling their kids stories about dudes they were fucking before their dad?

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The "kid" could be 24 when this was tweeted.

Also, it could've been the dad.