this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
60 points (96.9% liked)

The Deprogram Podcast

1605 readers
100 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985


International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.


Rules:

  1. No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
  2. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
  4. No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
  5. No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).

Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The collapse of the American empire would benefit almost every other country. I am starting to feel that since I live in America I should want to accelerate the collapse (or make sure one happens if things start to go back to business as usual). Can someone tell me why this is a bad idea so that I don't make a mistake here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

As @starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml said, accelerationism isn't particularly useful, and risks desparation from the reactionaries plunging the world into war. Without working class organization, there is nothing to resist that meaningfully.

I think a common pattern with your posts is that they tend to fall into desparation and confusion stemming from a lack of theory. In your case, I think reading theory would be immensely clarifying and comforting. I made an introductory Marxist-Leninist reading list, but many others out there exist as well. I recommend you give that a try!

[–] Comrade1917@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I just feel like it's almost impossible to make changes in America with how everyone is afraid of communism and how many still fall for western propaganda. I can't even convince my own dad that capitalism is the problem. (even if I read theory I don't think it would be able to convince him). America is the number one blocker of all progress towards a better future. Is there even any hope for a revolution in America or do we just have to hope the collapse causes a civil war so that America can't lash out at other countries.

[–] haui@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not trying to dump on you but its a common misconception of people without good habits to think good habits wont help. This is called learned helplessness and it preserves the status quo.

Remember that you need to accept being wrong as a marxist. That is a core value.

[–] ComradeRandy@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I fucking love that quote "you need to accept being wrong as a marxist." Somebody put that shit in the communist quote rotation. Fallibility is a lost art in the imperial core.

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yep, westerners take any failings as deep moral failings. It's why AES not being "pure" and free of sin immediately loses support. That's also why parties endlessly split, there isn't a focus on unity because accountability means admitting failure.

[–] Comrade1917@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

To be fair I linked my dad good sources like this one for US imperialism and he says it's "too biased" https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md#pervasive

Also these videos on debunking myths of communism and the other one is the death count of capitalism. https://youtu.be/BeRjTtKFlVM

https://youtu.be/Q5LMxXC8qWg

[–] haui@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As much as these are impressive, you will be much more convincing once you have a solid base.

Without being able to explain on a moments notice the reason why people should believe you and not some other rando (materialism), why they should consider an alternative narrative (dialectics), why it is easy to use thinking stoppers (e.g. the words biased or propaganda) to keep people in the thought prison, and how the world begins to make much more sense after leaving it, you wont get through to people. You need this theoretical base to convince people. Otherwise you will always scream into a void and get increasingly desoerate about it. That you are proving by asking for more drastic measures. It is the same as someone asking for an injection to make them loose weight, make them stop smoking, make them be more outgoing or whatever. Its always asking an external force to handle your problems. Asking for a shortcut.

There are no shortcuts.

Read theory. Stop with the rest.

Now go and read state and revolution, foundations of marxism leninism and questions of leninism.

They are really short and well written.

After that you can find the theory list on here pretty easily.

[–] gender_fungus@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Read theory. Stop with the rest.

Don't stop there. Also get organized and put the theory into practice. You cannot develop one without the other. As Mao puts it "knowledge begins with practice, and theoretical knowledge is acquired through practice and must then return to practice"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

These feelings are valid, but ultimately stem from a lack of theory. You don't need to worry about convincing people capitalism is bad, if people's material conditions aren't in a place for them to be susceptible to such ideas. Further, reading theory better helps you explain why capitalism is unsustainable. The US is the number one block, but as imperialism crumbles the chance for revolution raises. We must organize the working class to do so.

Read theory! You'll be happier for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cosmosaucer@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

while we're on the topic, i meant to ask you what you think of the mlreadinghub.org reading lists? if you have any thoughts at all.

also big shoutout for the reading list great work!

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

I've followed this before! I feel like it was quite helpful, and I took what I liked from it and added it to mine. It's valid as a starter list. I also like the Deprogram starter list as well, I intend on following it too as there's a lot of stuff I haven't read on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Accelerationism means actively working to make things worse for most people. Not only is it unnecessary because the decline is already ongoing and an eventual crisis of some sort therefore inevitable, but it is also bad strategy. Communists should not be seen to be making things worse, needless to say that is very bad optics. We should be seen as those who are most strongly on the side of the working class, defending and advancing their interests.

We want the masses to see us as trustworthy and reliable, as having their back and as those who they can trust to lead them. In order to win that trust you need more than just the right words, you need action. You need to show to the people by standing side by side with them in their struggles against capital, landlords, fascists, state violence, etc. that communists are those who will fight the hardest for their well-being.

By helping workers in their struggles you also contribute to the sharpening of contradictions as the limitations of the liberal bourgeois system are exposed and the need for a radically different system in order to fulfill all the needs and demands of workers becomes evident for more and more people. Organizing the working class is also how you prepare for "after the collapse", it's how you prepare the working class for eventually seizing power.

It is not sufficient for a collapse to occur, revolutionaries must be prepared and have the necessary support from a sufficiently large class conscious subsegment of the masses (in order to achieve this educational and agitation work is necessary) as well as the organizational infrastructure to be able to quickly mobilize the masses and fill the vacuum of power before our class enemies do.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

I will add one caveat to this which is that you will frequently see the term "accelerationism" used incorrectly by disingenuous liberals in an attempt to intimidate or shame communists and other leftists out of sticking by our principles. According to these people the definition of accelerationism is "when you don't vote for or support Democrats". That is of course ridiculous and people who say such things should be ridiculed.

[–] 666@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (11 children)

This may seem unprompted, but it has been something I've encountered in these threads before.

In these types of posts, I want to clarify that wanting America to be cut off from it's imperial exploitation of the global south is not "accelerationism". None of the things we are offered in the west are "granted" to us, they are taken by force; either violence or economic coercion and the average person benefits from it. Even someone like me who grew up in a demunicipalized slum with no warm water, no constant electricity and no basic amenities as a child could tell you that. Despite those conditions, I still benefited from colonial exploitation of the south.

Any measure or method by any nation to enforce it's economic and political sovereignty by seeking independence from American hegemony should be supported.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

since I live in America I should want to accelerate the collapse

consider that a collapse does not automatically mean things get better. fascists/military are very organised in the states, so in a collapse situation they will likely take power, without any barriers to do more atrocities. this is why accelerationism (focusing energy on collapse) is not a coherent strategy to achieve socialism. the only strategy is organising the working class

[–] Comrade1917@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would have thought a collapse would end more like a civil war due to the polarization of the country. I don't think the military/corporations could outright seize power without the "justification" of democracy because I would think people would resist that when no longer bound by the laws of the previous government.

[–] starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

As zuzak said, it would be a massacre, not a civil war. The US military is just way more organised than any opposition to it. This is why we need to build workers power to undermine the fascists.

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't believe the working class in the u.s will organize to any adequate degree without being truly and undeniably oppressed.

So yes the fascists will likely take power post government collapse but it's necessary

[–] Lowleekun@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is what it looks like to me from the outside as well. Sadly it seems similar in my country. The question though is, who will fight the new fascist powers and would it make more sense to organise in the countries that form opposition or should one try to resist from within these systems? With all the information and tools the state has it feels like fighting from outside would be more fruitful but tbh I am talking out of my ass and would love some guidance as to how to fight fascism now and in the coming years.

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

I think internal resistance will come naturally post crisis, the effort will be in taking advantage of the fervor and leading it in the right direction

Outside influence would be necessary in the form of support

I'm also talking out of my ass of course but these scenarios we speak about become more and more likely each passing day, some education would be great to know where to go next but I think most of us here are aware enough to see what's happening in the here and now

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

We should still do the best we can to organize what we can. This will mitigate the worst effects, and therefore is the best chance for success. Working actively towards collapse is harmful, assuming organizing is not the primary activity.

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We're in agreement, my only stipulation would be that any organization doesn't seek to delay what's inevitable via electoralism and awareness activism

Improvements to material conditions / aid should come from us not the state, otherwise people will continue to be comfortable with the status quo

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, I suppose, but the point is that being doomerist about org work and revolution just pushes all of the responsibility and agency to the global south, while we passively enjoy the spoils of imperialism. It's selfish, and is common to western leftists that just purity test.

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure where we disconnected here, I'm not doomerist about Org work. Organizing is great, just not for electoral solutions or peaceful protests.

We should focus on organizing in the form of food drives and other means of material support, especially now with how badly people are starting to struggle.

But at the same time now is the best time to agitate, and provoke the inevitable and self destructive rise of fascist adjacent political hegemony.

In just a few short years they have done more to move the needle in our favor and hamstring U.S geopolitical power than left adjacent electoral effort has in the last century.

Early you said "mitigate the worst effects" and I think that's perfect. We cannot prevent it from happening, we simply have no say in the matter. We can only bring what's on the way from the distant future to tomorrow's doorstep, while building something people can turn to in the aftermath.

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Sure, I don't disagree. I don't think we are disconnected, I just think it's important to not deny the potential for revolution in the west.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I don’t think it’s ever necessary for minorities and communists to die

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The American empire can be simplified into 2 parts.

One is the power projection overseas, and you can't really do much about that unless you have federal executive power, which the government and adjacent organizations are structured to prevent people like you and me from gaining. It will only be the geopolitical adversaries of the empire that wear this down.

The other is national cohesion. This includes logistics, domestic production, taxation, and even peaceful participation in American life. This is the glue that you can break down.

Things are going to get worse no matter what, there's no need to push them in that direction. Instead, every revolutionary has to consider the possible moments that will set off revolution, and make themselves as prepared as possible for those moments. What is a revolutionary force going to need?

You're not going to beat the chuds gun-for-gun or bullet-for-bullet. But they don't eat guns and they don't keep warm with bullets. Their sustenance comes from a globalized system of logistics that brings electricity to their houses, gasoline to their vehicles, and meat to their bellies. Consider that a lot of the enemy lives in suburban or exurban areas, well away from distribution centers, extremely car-dependent, and not efficient in electricity use at all. These are all glaring weaknesses; their way of life is teetering. You should be thinking not about how to slaughter them all, but about how to make them realize (beforehand or in retrospect) that they cannot just do a Civil War 2 to wipe you out without critically weakening America's domestic cohesion or maybe even its global power projection.

[–] Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

But counter point you want to collapse and weaken americas domestic cohesion but you don’t want to do that by feeding the fascists or intensifying capitalism

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Right. One answer leverages a critique of economics that recognizes that some goods and services are part of The Economy, and others are not. There have always been sectors external to capitalism; it cannot possibly control them all without literally putting all of humanity in a prison with perpetual coercion.

One strategy is to expand the domain of the "homestead" to where it includes unrelated people, exchanges less with the outside economy (i.e. direct production for use), and thus deprives the government of tax income in comparison to the average lifestyle. The government's own propaganda about "freedom" encompasses these "homesteads"; it cannot fight them on a broad scale without a civil war that weakens itself. And when a revolutionary army comes into being, they will need areas of material support that are not just "thousands of broke people in this town support you".

I'm not a fifth column, Inspector. I'm just a regular American citizen, pursuing the American Dream, this is just a plot of land that I do silviculture on. This is my only structure on the property and it's an unconventional construction, it probably wouldn't sell for much.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Accelerationism isnt taken seriously because it doesn’t guarantee social change but more specifically to you advocating for and trying to collapse the American nation isnt accelerationism since collapsing it would actually benefit the communist movement as a whole

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago

The collapse will come no matter what you do so it is better to spend your effort to make the outcome better by organizing and raising class consciousness. america is already going down really fast and there is no obvious counter to the fascists. The harder you and other american comrades work the less suffering will result from the inevitable fascist stage.

[–] haui@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

So first of all, I feel you. I want the empire and vasall states to collapse asap too.

For reasons I wont comment on what measures I deem reasonable because this is still public.

But all in all, I dont think accellerationism is bad in its own right. Imo our very job is to heighten the contradictions of capitalism and bourgois regime.

This we do through calling out the government and their bootlickers in every possible situation. This accellerates the decline. You will be called a nazi, wrecker or whatever but that is okay.

Then, one could say "vote for bad guy" or "stop helping good guy" but that does nothing. Voting makes no difference at all and helping your neighbors is probably the one thing you can ethically do without it having negative consequences on the decline.

But of course, never participate in bourgois parties or groups as they will slow the decline down as much as they can which is terrible. This thing needs to burn down and fast.

[–] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm reminded of when Margaret Thatcher first became Prime Minister in the UK. Some commies there supported her because they thought she would sharpen the contradictions and therefore bring about a revolution. We all know how that turned out.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

eh, so far it doesnt look like you need to do anything, the people in charge have it in hand

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wish I could answer your question but I'm in agreement.

It pains me to imagine any of our contemporaries having to suffer at all but the unwavering commitment to electoral solutions and awareness activism from those who are left adjacent and the most conscious of the u.s populace is clear evidence that we have gotten much too comfortable riding the backs of the global south and our own domestic unfortunates to do anything of political substance.

And then you have the rest of population, liberally right or so far gone that their only salvation is to become fertilizer.

I won't belabor what we all already know, the only way out is a revolutionary crisis.

[–] Comrade1917@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I do think that if it doesn't seem possible for a revolution in America the second best thing is collapse so at least the rest of the world can benefit. The worst thing that could happen is America stabilizing and maintaining hegemony. I am just disturbed by the fact that accelerationism might actually be a valid answer here (not for the people in America but for the rest of the world). If it is a valid viewpoint then why is it banned in r/socialism. I asked here to clarify.

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Unsure as to why it is banned but I believe that accelerationism as it is commonly known refers to a different ideology coined by some unpopular people, and has little to do with what you and I are discussing now.

To see what I mean, look into Nick Land and his Accelerationist views, otherwise maybe a more educated Comrade can speak on this point as I am not fully aware.

In my opinion, the need for a revolutionary crisis is only as ideological as the biological need humans have for air.

To your original point though, overall I think the collapse of the u.s as we know it would not only benefit the world but also those of us living in it.

[–] Comrade1917@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Depends on how it collapses. Technically the current president is collapsing American soft power already. He can't run the government competently which helps to accelerate the collapse. The problem for people living in America while this happens is things will get very bad as it increasingly represses it's citizens and the class divide will only widen. I do think the collapse of american hegemony is still worth it though for the rest of the world. Regardless of how much we hate the current president we have to admit he has done things liberals absolutely would not have done (dissolve USAID, tariff all countries (this makes other countries adapt and become less dependent on the US), destroying the ability of the us to get rare earths by engaging in a losing trade war with China.) I mean I absolutely hate him but technically he has done more to desolve American hegemony than any other president in history (probably by accident).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Collapse doesn't mean it's wiped off the map. All the guns and bombs will continue to exist as it becomes more and more of a failed state, there is a real possibility of lashing out and starting WWIII, and in any case the right is much better armed and poised to take advantage of the chaos.

All else being equal, I believe it's better if it doesn't collapse just yet. But we don't really get to decide that, and regardless of what we want or don't want, collapse is coming. There will be no return to the status quo, not for long anyway, because people are dissatisfied with it, and the powers that be have demonstrated that they're unwilling to make any sort of compromise to keep things running if it gets in the way of their looting.

There's no real reason to push for collapse since it's inevitable, it's better to just prepare for it so that we can best contain the damage.

[–] Comrade1917@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there a chance that the collapse causes a civil war so that the US will be too busy dealing with that to lash out at other countries? The country is polarized enough that I would think it would just take the right moment to cause that to happen. Other countries could take advantage of the weakness of the US during that time to surpass the US in every field. I feel like if a revolution can not be achieved this would be the best alternative because at least the rest of the world would benefit.

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

A civil war would be entirely one-sided bc one side has all the guns. That's not really a war, it's a massacre. And nobody's gonna risk their neck in the first place if it's a doomed cause.

There are two scenarios where there's a fighting chance, first, if the conflict is between the state and the right, and second, if the left becomes armed and organized.

The material conditions aren't set for the left to take advantage of chaos and collapse. The first order of business is to set up the correct material conditions.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sunbleachedfly@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

In my mind, accelerationism comes from the same thread of thought that adventurism comes from. It comes from an alienation from the masses & a certain amount of nihilism that leads us to believe the only way is for us to accelerate. Being isolated from people who think the way you do, especially about the way out, will also produce these feelings.

When I first understood communism as the solution, I tried to convince everyone around me. While I did convince people, it required a long & concerted effort over time. People in the US grew up their whole lives learning that communism was literally the fucking devil, even if logically it is the correct solution it is still going to be resisted. But when things get bad, those same people I tried to convince over time start to see it for themselves & they reach back out for answers. Your ability to convince people will not just be a quick conversation - establishing socialism in the US will be a generational project. The Soviet Union developed their project for arguably 20-30 years before the October revolution. China had a 30 year civil war before they won.

There is a fascist regime currently consolidating power wherever it can. There is more open defiance of the regime in power than we've ever seen before. There is plenty of energy to be redirected into organizing the masses & radicalizing people. This will continue - the degradation of material conditions will continue with or without you. The collapse will also come. But now is the time to put in the ground work so that people will look to you in the future.

Accelerationism increases the degradation of material conditions with no alternative. This simply leads to nihilism & creates a breeding ground for fascism. When the collapse comes, the means of production aka the way this society produces the things we need, will be degraded without an organized working force that can take control of it. These are the times when the masses can fight & take control, not react to & say "i told you so". The qualitative change, aka the "collapse", is the time for revolution - don't you want to be ready?

load more comments
view more: next ›