International law only applies to those on whom it can be enforced by someone stronger. Great powers are functionally above international law unless they voluntarily choose (like China) to abide by it. For great powers the purpose of international law is to regulate the actions of smaller states on the one hand, and on the other hand to legitimize the actions of great powers and minimize discontent and resistance.
cfgaussian
Good question. I'm not sure. If there isn't one then there should be.
Major blunder for the Zionists. Sooo many pro-Israel accounts were exposed as being from a completely different place than where they claimed to be.
Looks like it, yes.
Spain was fascist but not part of the Axis pact. The Spanish fascists received substantial help from Nazi Germany during the civil war against Republican Spain, but throughout WWII they declared themselves neutral and stayed mostly isolated due to being occupied with their own internal problems and exhaustion from the civil war.
They agreed to allow some volunteers to join Germany, but Spain itself never officially joined the war. There were plans for a potential joint German-Spanish attack on British territories on the Mediterranean but these never materialized because Spain was too vulnerable to a potential British trade blockade.
There was some trade with Nazi Germany including of a few resources that were important for the war, but the overall amounts were not large due to Spain being economically quite weak and devastated from the civil war. "Neutral" and "democratic" Sweden provided much more raw materials for the Nazis than fascist Spain did.
So yes, they were collaborators but not co-belligerents.
if anything ukraine not getting rolled immediately has smashed europe's kneecaps with a sledgehammer
This. The absolutely worst thing that could have happened to Europe is Russia not taking Kiev in three days, like Western analysts were saying they would. Ironically, if that had happened Europe would be in a much better situation and Russia in a much worse one than they are today.
What's Europe going to do in that case?
Cry, piss and shit their pants.
When propaganda and delusions crash against cold hard reality, the resulting mental wreck is ugly and painful.
This is what the Charter says:

Formally those three are the main Axis powers. But personally i would also add Finland, Romania and Hungary, all of which enthusiastically and voluntarily joined forces with the Nazis to invade the USSR.
Also Croatia and Bulgaria who collaborated with the Nazis to mass murder Serbs in Yugoslavia (the Croat fascists then finished the ethnic cleansing they started back in WWII during the Yugoslav wars in the 90s with the help of NATO).
In Asia, Thailand was the main Japanese collaborator.
Finally, Switzerland and Sweden managed to maintain plausible deniability by pretending that they were neutral but in reality both countries helped Nazi Germany a lot economically during the war, but i guess that doesn't suffice to qualify them as aggressor countries...




Anyone who even entertained for a single moment the notion that a plan which includes the idea of gifting 100 billion of Russia's stolen reserves to Ukraine came from the Russians should lose all credibility when it comes to commenting on this conflict. Same with the idea of allowing Ukraine to keep an army of over half a million men, or allowing Ukraine to continue to occupy constitutionally Russian territory. It was clear from the start to anyone with a brain that this half-baked "plan" didn't come from the Russians but from the incompetent jokers in the US administration trying to triangulate some nonsensical "middle ground" between fundamentally incompatible positions.