cfgaussian

...but instead, "Israel" is becoming Ukraine 2.0

The European Union has banned three journalists — two Germans, Alina Lipp and Thomas Röper, and a Turkish national living in Germany, Hüseyin Doğru — from entering the EU, and frozen their bank accounts. The EU accuses them of “spreading pro-Russian propaganda”, “undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine”, and “destabilising” EU countries through their reporting.

In fact, they are being punished solely for engaging in critical reporting about Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Gaza.

The fact that challenging the EU-NATO narrative on the war in Ukraine or on the genocide in Gaza is now effectively treated as a quasi-criminal, de facto act of treason justifying extra-judicial punishment in the form of travel bans and asset freezes is nothing short of terrifying.

The ethical and legal implications are staggering: two EU citizens have effectively been stripped of their basic civil liberties — exiled from virtually the entire European continent and subjected to financial strangulation — through a simple act of bureaucratic fiat, without trial or court ruling. This is punishment without process, imposed by an unaccountable, out-of-control elite, in defiance of the most basic principles of the rule of law.

Making the ruling even more chilling is the fact that the decision is legally binding on all member states. That means that anyone who provides funds or resources to the accused journalists would also be in violation of the sanctions and could themselves be sanctioned as a result.

With the snap of a finger, EU officials have swept aside centuries of legal development. Core principles such as the separation of powers (whereby punishment should be the exclusive domain of independent courts), proportionality and the foundational concept of nulla poena sine lege — no punishment without law — have effectively been discarded.

In effect, EU elites have discovered a way to bypass all legal and constitutional safeguards against the repression of dissent, by weaponising a mechanism originally designed to target foreign entities, not domestic citizens.

The geographic scope of the ruling is also entirely without precedent: while in the past there have been isolated cases of individual states denying re-entry to their own nationals for political reasons, typically by revoking their citizenship, a practice broadly condemned under international law, there is no historical precedent for a supranational body imposing a travel ban on a citizen of a member state across almost thirty countries simultaneously.

This exposes the dangerous flipside of the EU’s supranational legal framework: rights that apply uniformly across all member states can just as easily be revoked across the entire bloc through mere bureaucratic fiat.

In the past, individuals facing political persecution in one European country could seek refuge or political asylum in another. That is no longer possible, especially when the persecution is orchestrated by the supranational and international authorities of the Union itself.

All Europeans who believe in democracy and the rule of law — whether on the left, the right or anywhere in between — must push back against this monstrosity, regardless of what they think of Röper, Lipp, or Doğru’s views. If we don’t stand up for them now, any one of us could be next.

Read my article about this astonishing story here: https://www.public.news/p/eu-travel-ban-on-three-journalists

The red flag fell over the Kremlin in 1991.

The West declared victory. China took notes.

For three decades, the CPC has dissected why the USSR collapsed—not because socialism failed, but because its guardians surrendered.

Here’s what China learned.

1 — Bread, Then Ballots: How Economic Mismanagement Triggered Collapse

China's first lesson: economic reform must consolidate socialism—not dismantle it.

Gorbachev reversed this logic, liberalizing politics before resolving stagnation.

“Gorbachev was pushing political reform ahead of economic reform; China under Deng was promoting economic reform ahead of political reform.” — Victor Gao

Perestroika unleashed market chaos without structure. Supply chains collapsed. Prices exploded.

"The privatization reform led to a serious polarization of the distribution of wealth, a lack of socialist ideals and beliefs, an extremely chaotic sense of ethics and morality, and an all-round regression of the social spirit." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua

The acute failure wasn’t socialism itself, but reform without sequence, without control.

2 — Historical Nihilism: How the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Lost the Will to Rule

The CPC’s second lesson: revolutions die when they lose faith in themselves.

“There are multiple factors contributing to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a very important one being Khrushchev throwing away Stalin’s knife and Gorbachev’s open betrayal of Marxism-Leninism.” - CPC leader Hu Jintao

“Khrushchev’s denunciation ‘shook the foundations’ of Soviet authority.” — Hu Jintao

Gorbachev’s glasnost reforms—intended as renewal—accelerated ideological collapse.

"After the legalization of private newspapers and the privatization of state-run media, the main media in the Soviet Union were soon controlled by private capital and elite forces inside and outside the Soviet Union.

Capital at home and abroad tried its best to vilify and subvert the socialist system and preach the glorification of the eternal rule of capitalism...

With the implementation of the policy of "openness without restrictions," a vigorous trend of historical nihilism that negated the CPSU and the Soviet Union rapidly spread to the historiographical, theoretical, and ideological circles." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua

“An important reason [for the Soviet collapse] was that their ideals and convictions wavered.” — Xi Jinping

A party that discredits its own history cannot hold power.

Historical nihilism was suicide by self-critique.

3 — From One Party to No Party: How the CPSU Dismantled Itself

The CPSU didn’t fall to a revolution. It collapsed because no one defended it—not the Party, not the people, not the army.

Gorbachev’s reforms eroded Party control: contested elections, a presidency outside the Party, pluralist elites.

"The so-called Gorbachev-style socialism was just a slogan, he himself did not have a well-formed concept.

At that time Gorbachev also came up with this slogan, ‘More socialism, more democracy’. This is a very stupid way of putting it. Is there socialism or is there not socialism?

The reference to more or less is nonsense.

So when the question was raised as to what is 'more socialism', Gorbachev, the proponent of this formulation, himself spread his arms and didn't know how to answer." — Aleksandr Kapto, Former Head of CPSU Central Committee’s Ideological Department

When the Party’s authority dissolved, the state followed.

Reform without discipline became liquidation.

4 — One Union, Fifteen Flags: How the USSR Imploded from the Periphery

The Soviet Union constitutionally allowed its republics to secede. And when the center weakened, they did.

“Even a symbolic secession clause can become a real dagger when central authority wanes.” — Global Times

Gorbachev’s decentralization enabled nationalist movements to legally dissolve the Union.

“Moscow’s failure to ‘subordinate ethnic identity and stamp out local nationalisms’ was a primary reason the federation dissolved.” — Prof. Ma Rong, Peking University

Beijing responded by rejecting Soviet-style federalism.

China recognizes ethnic diversity—but sovereignty is indivisible. National cohesion is a red line.

5 — Overreach, Not Encirclement: How the USSR Exhausted Itself Geopolitically

The USSR wasn’t simply outgunned—it overextended itself trying to match imperial pressure on imperial terms.

Arms races, Afghanistan, client-state subsidies—it drained itself.

Military spending rose to an estimated 15–17% of Soviet GDP by the 1980s, a colossal allocation that starved civilian sectors.

The CPC sees this as partially self-inflicted. The West pushed, but the USSR walked into the trap.

The Chinese lesson: strength begins with development, not illusions of trust or military footprint.

6 — Dollar Wars: How U.S. Finance Helped Break the Soviet Economy

The CPC also studied how the USSR was broken by oil shocks and credit warfare.

In the 1980s, oil revenues were the USSR’s lifeline. When Saudi overproduction—backed by the U.S.—crashed prices, Soviet income collapsed.

“The Soviet economy was ‘fragile’ by the 1980s, overly dependent on resource exports and burdened by costly obligations.” — CCTV / Global Times

Desperate, Soviet leaders turned to Western credit—but loans came with strings: liberalization, privatization, and chaos.

Core lesson: never let your economy be hostage to foreign currencies, foreign markets, or foreign lenders.

7 — Peaceful Evolution: How the West Won the Information War

The USSR didn’t just lose a battle of arms. It lost a battle of ideas.

Western liberalism entered via glasnost, NGOs, dissidents, and cultural infiltration. The CPSU disarmed itself ideologically—and the West filled the vacuum.

“The CPSU’s removal of the seal of Marxism and Leninism in the ideological field... set free the demon, which destroyed it. The collapse of thoughts brought the collapse of the CPSU.” — CPC Documentary

Western NGOs, spies, and propaganda efforts incubated a pro-Western fifth column within the USSR.

Ideological security is national security. If your enemies teach your youth what to believe, you’ve already lost.

7 — No One Resisted: The Final Lesson of Soviet Collapse

When the end came, no one defended the Soviet Union. 19 million Party members stood down. The military didn’t act. The state evaporated without resistance.

The Party had died long before the flag came down.

“In the end, nobody was a real man, nobody came out to resist.” — Xi Jinping

The CPC sees this as the endgame of ideological surrender, strategic confusion, and liberal reform: not death by external blow—but collapse from within.

"Individuals from Khrushchev to Gorbachev slowly distorted, castrated, falsified, and betrayed the correct theoretical foundation laid by Lenin for the CPSU...

If the foundation is not strong, the earth moves and the mountain shakes. Having lost the theoretical basis of Marxism-Leninism, the Soviet Union’s collapse was inevitable." — CPC documentary

From Beijing's 2006 documentary 'Preparing For Danger In Times Of Safety – Historic Lessons Learned from the Demise of Soviet Communism':

"From the 1991 Soviet disintegration to the end of the 20th century, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) declined by 52% compared with the GDP level in 1990, while it declined only 22% during the war years from 1941 to 1945.

Over the same period (1991 to the end of the 20th century), Russian industrial production decreased by 64.5%, and agricultural production by 60.4%.

As the ruble devaluated, prices rose 5000 times.

Since 1992, the Russian population has been declining. In 1990 average life expectancy in Russia was 69.2 years, but it fell to 65.3 years in 2001, almost 4 year’s decline. The male life expectancy in some parts dropped a full 10 years.

The disintegration of the CPSU and the Soviet Union has brought disastrous consequences to the people and the country, far beyond these figures and situations."