this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
85 points (92.1% liked)

Asklemmy

51017 readers
690 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you think this started with Silicon Valley that's a mistake

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 39 points 5 days ago (14 children)

You have to take that into consideration in your planning. Don't go full prepper but do diversify your holdings. That's just basic anyway.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In Canada at least you can have the funds pulled from the market and put in cash hold until you are comfortable with the market for RRSP/RESP.

Some banks will try to tell you you cannot do this or will charge you $100/month to keep it in cash. If they do, go to another institution and get it moved there. Many credit unions offer the same accounts with zero charges for holding cash.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Eh? Term deposits/GIC savings vehicles generally just generate interest for the depositor, without fees involved. Demand accounts like chequing accounts / payment oriented accounts, will sometimes have a fee, which will typically get waived if the amount in that account exceeds a certain value (typically around $1000-1500). Been that way forever at CUs. It's generally because they can use that capital to fund loans, more confidently, if the money's locked in to a term deposit for a set period -- in a simple small CU setup, they're essentially taking all those deposits, pooling them together to help people buy homes, and charging the borrowers enough to pay both the deposit interest and the CUs operating costs. There's very little 'risk', given that any loan is secured by property, with a loan to value ratio of around 75-80% at the high end -- something regulators seem oblivious to at times in Canada, as many cripple industry without cause. They're actively working to kill small CUs, while also whining federally about a lack of financial industry competition.

But back on topic, I think the posters comment is more trying to imply that all assets/money is a bubble. I'm not really sure why. But whether you have money in property/assets, or money sitting in an account, it's part of "the entire financial system" that the poster says is a giant bubble.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago (45 children)

The scary part of this one is that previously, we had administrations that, while still being right-of-center (yes ML, I know), had at least enough sense to prop things up well enough to recover.

I don’t have faith that the fascist goons will take any steps to properly protect anything (regardless of whether its the ideal system or not) and just let everything fall apart.

Considering all the damage just seems to be blatant wrecker shit trump is doing as “revenge” for who knows what, probably having his pedo time taken away by the imperial core (and under his watch too) I think he wants this place to burn and cooking us all is his sick revenge fetish at this point.

Fucking prick

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The problem is that they kept propping things up and mitigating losses from those with wealth, i.e. protecting boomers.

Recessions hurt, but they are historically a natural method of wealth redistribution. In a recession, people with stuff lose much more than the people without stuff, and then on the way back out the people without stuff now have a better chance to capture some of that wealth.

Same for war. Historically speaking.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Kind of reminds me of how our 100 year long strategy of putting out all forest fires as soon as the first spark erupts, has lead to large buildups of brush and growth, that under normal circumstances would have been burnt back, sparing the large trees and forest as A whole… but now provides so much fuel, that any fire now is not only an unstoppable force, it also kills any and every thing leaving the forests irrecoverable.

load more comments (44 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If you live long enough, you've been through a number of bubbles. For me thats:

  • Black Monday (1987)
  • Dot com bubble (2000) which also bled into 9/11 economics impacts
  • Great Recession (2008)
  • COVID (2020)

The next bubble will just be another. Economy will slow, value of most assets will drop. Jobs will be lost, homes foreclosed on...and then the recovery will begin again. We'll look in the mirror shocked we survived it then in a few years we'll completely forget about it and be terrified of the next bubble.

So, prepare by living within you means, take care of yourself and your loved ones, and just be ready to weather the next storm. We'll get through that one too.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago

Covid wasn't a "bubble".

Or if it was, it was all the over investment in entertainment and productivity tools. In which case, that popped around 2023 when everything got cancelled and RTO layoffs started.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (27 children)

There is a bubble every decade. When you are saving over 40 years or more a single year dip every 10 years is fine.

Don't sell in the dip, buy in the dip.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

The underlying asset bubble based on unequal exchange has never been popped and there is zero cushioning for it. This is not 1976 nor 2008

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] dan@upvote.au 10 points 5 days ago

Ah, yes, the WallStreetBets approach.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] drwho@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I don't expect to live long enough to retire. Any hope that I'd eventually be able to retire and enjoy life for a change went out the window in 2008 when the housing bubble popped.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

There's a lot of fun stuff coming soon, stick around if possible.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

same here and my doctor confirmed it not too long ago; it's a little bit freeing knowing that i don't have to put any effort into planning from my elderly years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago
[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m about 6ish years away from retirement (the goal is Dec 31 2031). I’ve been doing a lot of work in stock markets as a result of preparing for it. The thing with the stock market is you only lose money when you sell. If a bubble pops, but you don’t sell and you keep it in there, you will eventually make your money back and recover. Diversifying your portfolio also helps, if the housing bubble pops, the entertainment sector will likely grow because people need escapism. The AI bubble is huge right now and when that pops it will be worse than the dot com bubble, even though that bubble popped, websites are still around and that industry is larger today than it has ever been. Like websites AI is here to stay, and will eventually become larger than it is right now. It’s just time, wait it out and it will normalize.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›