this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
467 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26108 readers
2811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Trump has been a cheerleader for coal miners. But these miners say his administration is failing to enforce limits on a lethal workplace hazard

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The coal miners have served their purpose.....why would Trump care?

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What fucking year is it again?

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 week ago
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

It blows my mind that there are people that think they wouldn’t also be victims of his greed.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Coal is a dead industry being propped up by the kickbacks used to buy senators. People who work in that industry should have already been planning a move over to the clean energy sector.

Instead you vote for an orange cancer that cuts your job, cuts your insurance, and makes sure you can't move over to the clean industries by taking away their funding...

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Were previous presidents shutting down mines? I mean they were talking about how somehow magically coal miners would become solar miners or something, but did they actually address any material conditions that allowed coal miners to exist in the first place?
Apply any wealth redistribution to the companies and individual that own coal mines?

Any non-neoliberal policy that talked about anything except "re-training" as if that is the fundamental issue with these coal-miners?

Anything that suggests the coal miners weren't "cast aside to die" under previous presidents?

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

and how many of them voted for trump?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›