That interview she just put out was gut wrenching. She has every right to feel indignant at her treatment but she still wants to fight and reframe the discussion around those that are suffering more.
Shes basically The Shit.
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
Related communities:
That interview she just put out was gut wrenching. She has every right to feel indignant at her treatment but she still wants to fight and reframe the discussion around those that are suffering more.
Shes basically The Shit.
Unsure if it's the one you're referring to, but she did an interview in Swedish and the frustration you hear from her is just as gut wrenching.
I could speak of all of the children who are no longer able to go to school, of all the children who required amputation, of all the children now orphaned. Of all of the houses and quarters that have been obliterated by bombs. I could also speak of the extreme physical abuse and the torture we were subjected to in prison. I could speak of the many bombings that our boats were attacked with on the way to Gaza. But nothing sticks! I could list all the international laws and UN conventions that Israel is breaking every day, of which we have seen a tiny, tiny piece. But this has already been said thousands of times. And like I said, it doesn't stick.
She technically says "it doesn't bite" rather than stick, but I don't think that kind of phrasing works in English. In essence, it means to have an effect. She expresses that nothing she can say will have any sort of effect, so why bother talking about it? That it's not like we're unaware of what's going on, but that we're choosing to ignore it. How no matter what atrocities we're exposed to, nothing has the effect of making those in power do something about it.
We're pouring money to Ukraine in this proxy war against Russia, which obvs. isn't a bad thing, Ukraine deserves the support. Yet our politicians are expressing none of that staunch humanitarian fervour for the Palestinians.
She is as bad ass as these right wing grifters wished they were. But if your audience is brain dead, you don't actually have to do anything, you can just claim things.
She should win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Not only does she deserve it, but the tantrum Mango Mussolini would throw about it would be so fucking funny.
The Nobel peace prize is reserved for war criminals. It's a fucking joke.
The woman has impeccable integrity and a worldwide audience. I cannot overstate how dangerous she is. No amount of money or manipulation can turn her sights off pollution and genocide.
Put yourself in the place of the wealthy. You can buy anything you want, nothing is out of bounds. Everyone kisses your ass and does as you say. But this pestiferous little woman can't be bought, and failing that, she cannot be threatened. Carry her off to jail for the evening, your picture is placed alongside a picture of her smiling as the cops drag her off. Imagine your shock and fear! This is totally outside your experience. I'm rather surprised she hasn't been quietly assassinated, made to look an accident.
"Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn."
Or not burn as the case may be. :)
Nothing short of killing her would work, and even then she would be a martyr
Ho Ho.....ones opinion of Greta is, to make, a truly accurate barometer of your character. Funny how mainly assholes dislike her.
It really is a simple litmus test. Why would you hate the girl that's sometimes on the news, standing tall for what she believes in, if you aren't a complete piece of shit? What reasonable explanation could there be for hating her? None.
The conversations I’ve had about her when she first made waves were all the same.
Them: I can’t stand her, who does that little pipsqueeck think she is telling adults what to do?
Me: What does her age have to do with what she is saying? Does it make the message any less true?
Them: well… erm… I mean
The OBVIOUS takeaway didn’t have the “obvious takeaway” sticker all over it I guess ffs.
It always bothered me how back then people were all "well, I don't see her coming up with any solutions!"
She's a kid my friend, she's a kid using her free speech in a democratic manner to call for the powers that be to make change. She doesn't need to have the answers, that's not her job. Why are you expecting a child to do the work of adults? Fucking expect more from the adults that are doing fuck all to accomplish anything but fatten their pockets and hollow out our public properties.
Edit: I'm talking about then, not now. I know that she's not a kid anymore.
I feel like when it comes to passion, autism is a superpower. My neurotypical self, would never.
More power to her.
Will is a superpower. Drive and focus are superpowers. Hyperfixation are just happenstance. She has done this of her own making and design, not because of a quirk of her birth. Anyone is capable of it, given the right mindset.
I'm always happy to see Greta Thunberg posts that aren't take-downs.
She is who I wanted to be before I gave up on my dreams.
Greta Thunberg is a good explanation of why someone like Joan of Arc could have been so transformative. Like, there is a war, and a peasant girl comes out of fucking nowhere and changes the whole course of history, how could something like that happen. Also the story of Joan of Arc tells of the hatred of the detractors and the lengths they will go to silence her AND how that completely backfires.
Many people hate her because she is the antithesis of what they think a woman should be. On top of it she has a lot of qualities (courage, persistence, passion etc) that these people wish to have themselves but don't so they try to compensate by attacking her.
She legit deserves to be canonized as a saint, yet republicunts want to rape her.
"Fresh out of captivity"?
What did I miss?
She got arrested and beaten by Israelis when trying to deliver supplies to Gaza via boat .
She got arrested for a second time. She's probably going to be arrested a third time too.
Under maritime law, she was a victim of kidnapping and piracy, and was never arrested as it happened outside Israel's territorial waters, where it has no authority to have a blockade.
This response is based on the San Remo Manual of International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea.
If Israel is conducting a lawful blockade, then they can intercept neutrals who have expressed intent to run the blockade. It doesn't matter whether the events happen in Israel's territorial waters, international waters, or the territorial waters of Israel's enemy.
A blockade is an act of war, and war doesn't respect territories, and it's not always respectful to neutrals.
Now, there is a decent argument that this particular blockade is unlawful for a different reason: it is a collective punishment of Gazan civilians. Collective punishment of civilian populations as a whole was made illegal after WWII.
Secondly, the blockade is unlawful if its only purpose is to starve the enemy population of food (102). Israel must be getting some proportionate military advantage out of this blockade besides the starvation for it to be lawful.
And finally, regardless of whether the blockade is legal, Israel has to let the humanitarian supplies pass through (103-104). And I'm not sure they did that. They will say that they let these things through on the (heavily regulated) land route, but the book here doesn't say that land route is a substitute. Also, they are not using an impartial Protective Power to distribute the aid. This is why they offered to reroute the flotilla's supplies on to the land channel.
Note: the rule is they have to let the supplies through, not the people or vessels. If they're running a legitimate blockade, they can capture neutral vessels that are running it, and they can capture the neutrals on board and subject them to legal process, or maybe even intern them for the duration of conflict
The latest aid flotilla to Palestine that she was taking part in was abducted by Israeli forces in international waters. I've seen various comments on her treatment by those Israeli forces but none of them were humane, spanning from forcing her and other victims to sleep in pest-infested conditions to actual physical assault.