With Grok, Grokipedia aims for maximum truth through first principles and physics.
Fuck you.
Signed,
a physicist
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
69 points (98.6% liked)
TechTakes
2236 readers
234 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Grokipedia aims for maximum truth through first principles and physics. It replaces partially masked evidences of how legacy media operates, rewriting with complete accurate context that cuts through the BS.
Christ, these people are so fucking stupid. Can't wait to see how Nazi autocomplete solves the problem of induction.
Also, 'fun' fact. The second result for first principles on ddg is a blog post by a self-help guru sucking Musk off so hard you'd think they're being held at gun point.
So, Conservapedia but more banal?
Going on the Grok output, I saw: Conservapedia with more uses of the word fuck (it can now use the word fuck), extremely verbose mid insults and weird flirting.
Fuck off to mars already.
Guillotines don't work in space, that's why billionaires are so obsessed with going there.
Airlock can be a verb.
Does if you're accelerating / decelerating.
Or add a rocket booster.
Make it out of a rail gun for an even more scifi version.
Because xpedia is too close to another company name.
For it to be authentic, they need multiple bots arguing on Talk pages and undoing each other's edits.
So... They're going to use the bot trained on wikipedia to rewrite wikipedia. Very much a Pierre Menard type situation.
Ah, but they can inject it with all kinds of fascist bullshit.
I wonder where he's going to get sources to cite.
i wonder what else he had go wrong the last period he needed a distraction like this