this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
135 points (81.7% liked)

Firefox

21021 readers
518 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox app on android. Never seen this before until today. But Firefox is now putting ads in the app?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago

They've been doing it on desktop Firefox for ages

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Wow. Wtf... Thats absolutely ridiculous.

Edit: oh its the tab page. Never used it...

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Explain? I use ironfox and its great.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

WaterFox and LibreWolf are decent alternatives if you get tired of needing to opt out of Mozilla nonsense.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 4 points 10 hours ago
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 21 points 17 hours ago

They've always done that afaik?

[–] ashughes@feddit.uk 48 points 19 hours ago

Former employee here. Firefox has been adding sponsored content to the new tab page since Firefox 60 in 2018. Their support article gives a good amount of detail on how it works, but perhaps more importantly for you, how to disable it.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 18 hours ago

I always wonder how these links even work. Who would even click on them except by accident?

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 127 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

settings > homepage > shortcuts > uncheck 'sponsored shortcuts'

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah but Firefox doesn't get their income like google does

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

They get it from Google ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

They will never compete with Google by adding ads to the browser. I pay for Kagi, I would pay for Firefox too, but I guess most people wont.

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but it doesn't change that it's sh*t. It's no justification

[–] PrincessCory@lemmy.wtf 8 points 10 hours ago

How do you mean its not justificatin? If noone is paying you would you still go to work?

If we want firefox to be good again we need to pay for it, or rather give some symbolic amount that will be huge for them because there are tousent of people using firefox.

Even thou they are losing users for years and now hawe only a relativly small procent of world populacion. Which is bad because people dont understand that firefox is open source and chrome is proprietery.

And dont even understand what open source means.. Thats why we are in situacion like this where google is controling everything…

[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think people need to appreciate that Mozilla is probably the only company in the world that will allow you to turn off ads like this, for free.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago

Low bar, but that's how far our options have sunk.

Yet one so many competitors fail to clear.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ah hahahaha no. That's not even close to true. Do we seriously need to mention the dozens of alternative web browsers out there?

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

There are not dozens of alternative browsers. There is Chromium, Safari, and Firefox, with a few niche options that aren't really production ready yet and may never be. The "variety" you speak of is just Chromium in lots of disguises.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I turn everything off in Firefox’s new page except search! I always found the news stuff distracting too.

that's typically what i do but on desktop i turn off search too since a) i use the awesomebar primarily and b) my ntp is a background and i'd rather see that for a cleaner look :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 140 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I think those have been there since forever?

[–] Tug@kbin.earth 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This should be towards the top. I've been on FF4A for years now and they've had those links there the whole time. You can toggle them off if yku don't want them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 28 points 1 day ago

Pretty much

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Oh fuck that.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 76 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As has always been the case, you can turn off Sponsored Shortcuts and Sponsored Stories.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 day ago (13 children)

So, every real alternative to Firefox, is most likely based on all the work that Mozilla has done on Firefox. People get it for free, and yet they crumple and whine, when Mozilla tries to get the money to keep steady development going.

I want it free, I want them to do all the work, and then I'm going to use another browser, based on their work, because I don't like that great development cost money - and I won't pay! Buhuu!

Get over yourself. Mozilla does great work for users worldwide. Don't like to see ads? Then start donating! Grow TF up, and realize that nothing is free in a capitalistic world!

[–] azdle@news.idlestate.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donating to Mozilla doesn't change any behavior in Firefox.

Also, donations to Mozilla don't go towards Firefox development. As far as I'm aware the only way to "give" money to Mozilla Corp (who work on Firefox, as opposed to the Mozilla Foundation) is to subscribe to the VPN service they resell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would pay for Firefox. The same way I donate every year to Thunderbird!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] limer@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I prefer to view this as a socialist. Firefox is the work of tens of thousands of laborers, and is not owned by an out of touch upper class. Yet, they are mismanaging it.

It took me time to realize that I, a highly trained engineer, was a laborer and have similar issues to most people the last few centuries.

It is literally needed that the workers of Firefox rise up and revolt before the entire project is harmed beyond repair

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I didn't mind the occasional sponsor or two for many years. Then one day they went over the line.

Yeah I know i should be on librefox/waterfox. Im lazy okay?

[–] ashughes@feddit.uk 7 points 19 hours ago

That was actually a server-side bug 8 months ago which they not only fixed within 3 days of the issue being reported but followed it up with a hard block against more than 2 displaying at once to make extra sure this didn’t happen again.

If this is what you’re currently seeing then please report it to them. If instead this is an old screenshot then I’ll just agree that Mozilla has certainly suffered many avoidable self-inflicted wounds but this isn’t one of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

This isn't new afaik. You can disable it in settings

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 13 hours ago

Use Fennec on FDroid. While you can, lol.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Making a browser is expensive (especially with such incompetent management), they need to make money somehow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›