this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
218 points (95.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34914 readers
2071 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this not the reason the second amendment exists? Regards An Australian Edit: I'm not advocating for violence. More so "a well regulated militia" which could be established by protesters or Democratic Governors for genuine self defence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 1 points 4 minutes ago

Protesters who use violence to protect their neighbors will be killed. This is fascism. We can't use force to defend ourselves.

[–] FryHyde@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Best and simplest answer is that technically they're still considered law enforcement. Nearly everything they're doing is constitutionally illegal, but only the courts have the right to determine that.

If we start threatening police with guns, every single nook and cranny of our legal system justifies the police murdering us. Maybe some cops would get paid leave for a few weeks, or possibly even lose their badges, but that's about it.

And then they'll use it to justify an even more inflated budget for ICE, and everything will get exponentially worse.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)
[–] MSids@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

It would just escalate things. A few armed confrontations one week and the next week it would be tanks and Apache helicopters. Cops love to escalate.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world -2 points 58 minutes ago

I see u! How much are they paying you to ferment chaos?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Because people won’t open carry when it’s against the law so they don’t get arrested. Unlike ICE, they’re following the law.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I believe open carry is illegal here in Illinois.

The meta I've heard is also that, if you're gonna brandish or draw a gun, you'd better be prepared to kill with it. I'm not prepared to die shooting cops so I don't feel like carrying. In the confusion of a gun fight I don't think I'd have much to add by shooting anyone

Like if someone told me that the 2nd amendment just causes more shootings and doesn't actually protect people on average I'd say yeah...

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

the meta youve heard js harmful.

“Brandish or draw a gun…better be prepared to kill with it.” — Normative, but the law is dead serious.

Illinois doesn’t have a standalone “brandishing” statute; threatening display can be charged as assault (often aggravated assault when a deadly weapon is involved). Separately, deadly force is only justified if you reasonably believe it’s necessary to prevent imminent death/serious bodily harm (or a forcible felony). Drawing in a way that threatens without lawful justification can be a crime.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 49 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'll give you a real answer instead of all of these other dork ass answers.

First, there aren't enough of us to do so.

Second, you really haven't thought through the repercussions of open carrying. Which relates to the first reason.

Open carrying puts a huge target on you. You need lots and lots of people to remain "safe". And you won't be safe. What are you going to do, shoot an ice agent if they try to arrest you? If that's your goal, why open carry? Do you think that the government here is going to suddenly follow constitutional law around a citizens right to bear arms? As they're literally illegally arresting people?

Sooner or later the amount of guns in this country is going to catch up to the ruling class but it's not going to be at a protest.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I live in a city that's half black, in one of several gayborhoods. I keep wondering when black and pink panthers will form and start patrolling. Probably when we get hit with our first localized stochastic terrorism incident. There's a rainbow crosswalk that rednecks love to come do burnouts on. Tensions run high with highly conservative MAGA folks dominating the rural areas just miles from our very flammable houses with rainbow flags.

But you know what happens when the panthers start patrolling? Suddenly, gun control.

Our cops wouldn't arrest them but the feds would probably escalate it. I am not sure how it'd play out today.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because people who are legal concealed carry permit holders regularly get shot in the back by police. People who act like you can stand up to a major world military are idiots.

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 17 hours ago (14 children)

Don't turn your back on the police and don't face them alone, fucking duh. Cops are cowards, they'll be a lot more hesitant to shoot someone if there's a credible risk of dozens/hundreds of other people immediately shooting back.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

don’t face them alone

*pervasive surveillance state has entered the chat*

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Because trump is hoping people will do something stupid so that he can overreact and put the entire country in lock down?

Unless you're going for a violent uprising, violent protests typically do less than large scale continuous peaceful protests

The problem is that the latter also doesn't happen in the US, it's as if Americans just don't care..

Oh yes, I know the excuses, we have a job, we have a family to feed, and DUDE YOU ARE A JEW IN GERMANY 1934, WOULD YOU PLEASE FRIGGING DO SOMETHING ALREADY?

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

even if no one does anything drastic, trump will escalate anyway. we may get something staged like with charlie kirk, but they may not even find a bullshit reason to justify themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Because the White House is looking for an excuse to have the military start slaughtering civilians and imprisoning democrats. A general strike is what we need to do

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (15 children)

At a certain point we have to fight back.

The argument of "we can't respond to their violence with violence or they will become more violent" doesn't hold water when they are getting increasingly violent anyway.

It's a coward's fallacy

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

We may reach that point.

We should try a general strike first. We don't even need to combine it with protests. We just have everyone stay home and refuse to work. You can fight the government by playing old video games or watching TV.

[–] whereyaaat@lemmings.world 4 points 3 hours ago

It’s a coward’s fallacy

Most of us are cowards, so this checks out.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

Armed victims increase the cost of tyranical actions but modern warfare and thus miltia movements is not just (have weapon, intimidate or kill enemy). Honestly one of the failures of the defense of the second amendment has been the failure to modernize and includr other parts of warfare.

Honestly there is a mixture of denial in what is actually happening and support too

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 29 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

The No Kings protest in Utah ended tragically because armed "peacekeepers" (aka armed civilians) shot at a protester who was open-carrying an AR-15 at the protest. The protester had no ill intentions, but the peacekeepers didn't know that. The peacekeepers missed and killed a bystander.

That's why you don't open carry at protests. The untrained "good guy with a gun" is likely to shoot you. Carry concealed if you're going to carry, or don't bring a gun at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›