this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
193 points (95.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34914 readers
1255 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this not the reason the second amendment exists? Regards An Australian Edit: I'm not advocating for violence. More so "a well regulated militia" which could be established by protesters or Democratic Governors for genuine self defence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 6 points 6 hours ago

I believe open carry is illegal here in Illinois.

The meta I've heard is also that, if you're gonna brandish or draw a gun, you'd better be prepared to kill with it. I'm not prepared to die shooting cops so I don't feel like carrying. In the confusion of a gun fight I don't think I'd have much to add by shooting anyone

Like if someone told me that the 2nd amendment just causes more shootings and doesn't actually protect people on average I'd say yeah...

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 39 points 11 hours ago

I'll give you a real answer instead of all of these other dork ass answers.

First, there aren't enough of us to do so.

Second, you really haven't thought through the repercussions of open carrying. Which relates to the first reason.

Open carrying puts a huge target on you. You need lots and lots of people to remain "safe". And you won't be safe. What are you going to do, shoot an ice agent if they try to arrest you? If that's your goal, why open carry? Do you think that the government here is going to suddenly follow constitutional law around a citizens right to bear arms? As they're literally illegally arresting people?

Sooner or later the amount of guns in this country is going to catch up to the ruling class but it's not going to be at a protest.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because people who are legal concealed carry permit holders regularly get shot in the back by police. People who act like you can stand up to a major world military are idiots.

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Don't turn your back on the police and don't face them alone, fucking duh. Cops are cowards, they'll be a lot more hesitant to shoot someone if there's a credible risk of dozens/hundreds of other people immediately shooting back.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 4 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

don’t face them alone

*pervasive surveillance state has entered the chat*

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No shit. That's the problem. You bring your friends and the cops will bring their tanks. Then what, have a dick measuring contest?

... Oh wait, they'll gun you all down and laugh about it instead.

So yeah, guns can be used, but let's not pretend flexing your firearm in public will easily accomplish your goal. Be thoughtful and careful about when and where.

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We had tanks in Afghanistan, didn't stop us from losing. Nobody in history, no matter how well armed, has ever won a war against a dedicated insurgency.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago

This right here. Asymmetrical warfare is terrible for modern occupying armies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Because trump is hoping people will do something stupid so that he can overreact and put the entire country in lock down?

Unless you're going for a violent uprising, violent protests typically do less than large scale continuous peaceful protests

The problem is that the latter also doesn't happen in the US, it's as if Americans just don't care..

Oh yes, I know the excuses, we have a job, we have a family to feed, and DUDE YOU ARE A JEW IN GERMANY 1934, WOULD YOU PLEASE FRIGGING DO SOMETHING ALREADY?

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

even if no one does anything drastic, trump will escalate anyway. we may get something staged like with charlie kirk, but they may not even find a bullshit reason to justify themselves.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

it’s as if Americans just don’t care…

They've been propagandized over generations into not trying. They have been lead to believe that what is here now is good and don't see that it could be better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Armed victims increase the cost of tyranical actions but modern warfare and thus miltia movements is not just (have weapon, intimidate or kill enemy). Honestly one of the failures of the defense of the second amendment has been the failure to modernize and includr other parts of warfare.

Honestly there is a mixture of denial in what is actually happening and support too

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 37 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Because the White House is looking for an excuse to have the military start slaughtering civilians and imprisoning democrats. A general strike is what we need to do

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

At a certain point we have to fight back.

The argument of "we can't respond to their violence with violence or they will become more violent" doesn't hold water when they are getting increasingly violent anyway.

It's a coward's fallacy

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I do understand your point but the military was told to attack and commit war crimes on American civilians so I just think that a general strike would be the most effective strategy in the situation we currently face. That’s just my opinion on the approach that would be the most efficient at this time.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 12 points 14 hours ago

It’s the most powerful tool in our arsenal. And it’s just sitting right at our feet. But we just won’t pick it up. I don’t get it.

General strike now.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (8 children)

https://generalstrikeus.com/

Once 11mil more strike cards are filled out it begins.

Otherwise we are waiting until 2028 when the Auto Workers Union starts their planned general strike

I will keep trying but I have very little faith in my fellow countrymen

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago

Ice thugs arresting unarmed citizens and lawful temporary residents brandish firearms and shove you into a van.

Ice thugs arresting armed citizens will probably shoot first.

In no case will they identify themselves or allow for an orderly review of all the paperwork every citizen would surely have with them at all times.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 6 points 12 hours ago

Why do people think that guns stop bullets? Guns attract bullets.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 26 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

The No Kings protest in Utah ended tragically because armed "peacekeepers" (aka armed civilians) shot at a protester who was open-carrying an AR-15 at the protest. The protester had no ill intentions, but the peacekeepers didn't know that. The peacekeepers missed and killed a bystander.

That's why you don't open carry at protests. The untrained "good guy with a gun" is likely to shoot you. Carry concealed if you're going to carry, or don't bring a gun at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Americans are domesticated cowards

Don't have kids, leave the country if you can afford to.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

people are cowards

load more comments
view more: next ›