this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

news

24372 readers
625 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Snip:

On Sunday, Trump warned that if Afghanistan doesn’t give the facility back, unspecified “BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN!!!” The US leader had earlier lamented Washington’s loss of the base, noting its proximity to China.

Later that day, Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesman of the Taliban-run Afghan government, noted that Kabul has made it clear to the US in all negotiations that the country’s “independence and territorial integrity are of the utmost importance.”

“It should be recalled that, under the Doha Agreement, the United States pledged that ‘it will not use or threaten force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Afghanistan, nor interfere in its internal affairs,’” he said, urging the US to honor its pledge.

“Rather than repeating past failed approaches, a policy of realism and rationality should be adopted,” Fitrat stressed.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

18 yo yankees:

born too late to invade afghanistan,

born too soon to retreat from afghanistan,

born just in time to invade afghanistan

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

actually though the CSTO won't give the US necessary military access to attack afghanistan, and pakistan isn't going to surrender what amounts to a puppet regime so what the US can actually do is limited to terror bombing

[–] CTHlurker@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't Pakistan pretty consistently against the IEA? I follow a few afghans on instagram and they have pretty negative views on the Pakistani government, even if Pakistan is one of the few places that hasn't attempted to put the country under siege.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

i interpret recent events as mostly theatre for domestic audiences, the taliban leadership owes pakistan deeply and i don't think they've meaningfully soured, or IEA would be facing a hell of a lot more pressure

[–] T34_69@hexbear.net 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The US leader had earlier lamented Washington’s loss of the base, noting its proximity to China.

Love how he can't keep his trap shut

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The taliban rn

[–] larrikin99@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

RT should've used a photograph of the deputy spokesperson of the Government of Afghanistan, instead of 4 random security personnel holding heavy weapons on a street corner.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

Turns out post soviet Russia is super racist. Shocker.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 43 points 1 week ago

trump-drenched They keep telling me 'it's the grave yard of empires' but look at these guys they've just got these little guns- we have the big guns, and we think that we're going to be using them a lot more- much sooner than anybody really thinks.

[–] mx_oceanwater_they_them@hexbear.net 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So now Trumps plan is to ally with Pakistan to invade Afghanistan again, while putting a 50% tariff on India to befriend Pakistan? Also use Pakistan to block off Iran, which has a direct land border with Iran? Did I get these convoluted geopolitical situations correct?

[–] Socialism_Is_The_Alternative@hexbear.net 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am certain that many hardcore imperialist warmongers in Washington would love to do that. However, given the massive geopolitical changes that have occurred, especially over the past five years, I do not think that Pakistan (allied with China) would actually allow it. The Western imperialists are not as mighty as they once were.

yeah my 2cents on this: They all have guns and landmines now. Drones coming soon. Pretty much any nation nowadays is extremely hard to invade.

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago

Bloodied and barely able to stand after the last bout, Empire furiously demands a rematch against Graveyard of Empires. Place your bets now folks! This will be one for the history books

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would they even gave it back? The USA would have to invade again plus they didnt even promise to unsanction the Taliban if they gave the base back

Also pissing off China a country that has lately ignore sanctions to trade with countries is just a bad idea

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

i mean look at Iran if you want examples of states acting directly contrary to their best interests, and Afghanistan has inferior checks on its leadership. But it mostly has to do with Islamabad, not Kabul. Seems relatively unlikely Pakistan will cede it's influence without substantial reward and pitting itself against the PRC after PRC military contracts have served them well seems insane

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So are they planning on dropping Ukkkraine and go back into Afghanistan?

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

I think he really wants to pass Ukraine off to Europe to handle so he can start invading other countries, like China, Iran, and now apparently Afghanistan.

[–] Leegh@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A part of me would love to see a reverse of the Soviet-Afghan war, where the US tries to take Afghanistan again and China covertly funds the Taliban.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

the people deserve a break, let's have a civil war between cops and the national guard

[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

Operation recyclone kelly

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

What could possibly go wrong?

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

The mid rank taliban guys have literally been openly talking about how they miss doing guerilla war