this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
121 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25730 readers
3004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 48 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is deliberate. They’re consolidating the grip of corporate agriculture. This will be a wealth/land transfer to the rich. Feudalism is back, baby.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Instead of the Lady of the lake, we have the troll with a Tesla

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can't be a leader because some tart in the lake through a sword at you

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You can't be a leader because you made up some story about some tart in a lake throwing a magical sword at you

[–] apenstaartje@lemmy.cafe 0 points 9 hours ago

Did you cast a vote into the direction most likely to ensure he lost?

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Remember that sooper-communist policy where the us government would buy surplus crops to ensure that too much was grown for the sake of having enough when there were bad years and crop disasters?

Gosh I wonder which president got rid of it

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It was Obama, wasn't it? Maybe Clinton?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It was Clinton... Nixon began dismantling it, Reagan for rid of government grain reserves, and Bill Clinton scrapped the last remaining big reserve mechanisms with the 1996 “Freedom to Farm Act”. That law explicitly moved U.S. farm policy away from supply management toward reliance on global markets.

When leftists tell liberals that Democrats are a different side of the same coin, it's because of shit like this. Everything horrible were dealing with is neo-liberal policies set in motion decades ago, and was called the lesser evil at the time. We're out of time, we need a revolution.

[–] unrealizedrealities@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The rural americans are the salt of the earth, the clay of the new west, you know, morons...

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've read trivia that Sherrif Bart was not allowed to see the script for this scene. His reaction is genuine.

Mel, is thank god, a true humanitarian....tis true, much of the film was 'off the cuff' for editorial reasons...Mel is a saint.....

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't this the plan so big corpos could buy out all the smaller farms?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

More like big ag corpos could buy out smaller ag corpos.

“Family” farms haven’t been family-operated in ages. Just family owned.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

GOD! he Was only supposed to go After BROWN AND TRANS KIDS! NOT us Farmers!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

"He's not hurting the people he needs to be hurting"

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There's going to be a lot of land available for Tech Bros to set up their private cities.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, fucking weirdoes like Curtis Yarvin and people that follow The Sovereign Individual are going to love that.

Now its time for Canada to come down with a 100% export tariff on Potash.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

"No one could have predicted this." /s