this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
472 points (99.8% liked)

news

151 readers
693 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 112 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I sure wish ride-hailing apps would let you specify "no Teslas".

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Obviously some people don't have much choice where there isn't anything else, but if they have the choice, I never understand why anybody would pay that amount of money for a taxi. If possible, you can also avoid those capitalistic companies by using local transit.

My local transit agency has trains and buses, but no Teslas. They are also charging exponentially less than a taxi that's backed by equity firms. And much safer than cars. All cars.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Public transit is basically non-existent for most of the United States.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

imagine living in a place with reliable public transportation

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (22 children)

Oh look, the thing we said would happen has happened. Again.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 72 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

In summary, never buy a Tesla.

The CEO is a bona fide nazi, and the board will stop at nothing to pay him a trillion dollars.

The vehicle will incinerate you at a time of its choosing.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Holy fuck this is all arguably not hyperbolic, satirical, nor seen as extreme.

Too ridiculous for fiction. Except P.K. Dick I guess.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 11 points 2 weeks ago

Makes you wonder if this is just another case of deregulation driving up its body count, or if a certain Nazi is acting out his oven fetish.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

This has happened before, and nothing seems to be done about it. 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago

How do people buy these things. I've seen entire car ranges written off for decades, for way less than, might lock you in and burn you alive. I don't get it.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

This is how I know, 100% no shadow of a doubt, TSLA is being highly illegally manipulated.

All in TSLQ and still waiting, maybe forever.. bottom line is either reality prevails and I make a LOT of money, or shit is rigged so bad we have no future anyway.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Godspeed to you. I was convinced of the same thing a couple of years ago and lost my ass shorting that stock. Turns out, the market can stay manipulated for a long fucking time because there's no regulatory body that actually gives a shit.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As the old adage goes, the market can stay irrational for longer than you can stay solvent

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 weeks ago

Poor kids :(

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Can anyone offer a good faith explanation of why they thought electronically controlled doors would be a good design choice?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Because American consumers are obsessed with pointless gadgetry, and bullshit sells cars.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I hate electronics in cars.

Efi and abs. Thats all anyone needs. Roll downs, manual, no screen, no digital gauge shit.

Sadly thats illegal to build now. And why cars cost so much.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't mind electronics out of hand, but I don't want my car to automatically be a data source for the manufacturer and remote control should be impossible, or at the very least something the owner can disable.

Unfortunately, neither is true of my 2019 Chevy Volt. Maybe my next EV.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Moreover, how long will it take for US auto regulators to ban them the way China already has?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

cool factor first
safety third

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty sure it's unironically just that it looks futuristic and is cheaper or something. It's one of those things where there's not too much to it, it's just a dumb design.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

But have you considered how much cheaper they are to make? 🤔

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 29 points 2 weeks ago

Standards exist for a reason. Sometimes low(er)-tech is better and you don't need to reinvent the wheel.

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Is it because rescuers couldn’t open the doors or because the victims were in a death trap designed by a moron?

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dont forget the windows are also laminated, so you can't just shatter them.

Sounds very safe..

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Axxys@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Do other unbreakable windows also come on vehicles where people routinely can't figure out how to open the door?

I think it's the combo of the two that's (preventable) problematic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If a Tesla sets itself on fire, does the FBI still consider that terrorism?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Terrorism is only when you hurt the Führer’s feelings or don’t sufficiently fellate the memory of one of his nazi pals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah so that’s why they’re paying Elon billions. Such business acumen. Such fantastic products.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 2 weeks ago

remember his robotaxis automatically identifies and locks on to children like a missile, and runs them over.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So if I'm understanding correctly, the windows on this car were made of transparent aluminum, not glass.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I hate fly-by-wire. I always will. It's just bad.

We used to prank the guy in HS who's parent bought him a BMW by putting a laminated card between his pedal cluster and the contact.

It's trash.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 24 points 2 weeks ago

Drive by wire - where the accelerator pedal is connected to the throttle electronically - is separate from these electronic doors with hidden and nonintuitive "emergency" interior release handles.

There's nothing wrong with a drive by wire accelerator.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How did these cars got approved in the first place? It boggles me to no end - there are strict safety requirements for seat belts, airbags and doors for cars to be greenlighted for sale to the general consumer

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Some ideas are considered too stupid to legislate against before someone does the stupid thing.

The world continues for a few centuries without them and then suddenly there are warning labels to "not to operate heavy machinery" on bottles of sleeping pills.

Door handles that don't work in an emergency are the engineering equivalent.

It's easy to make a door handle that always works, it takes effort to make a door handle that sometimes works. It's a special kind of stupid.

I can't imagine how bad a Tesla would be without the legislation in place to force their hand and make them safe. This problem slipped through the net.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›