What were the other options under consideration?
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)
College Football
944 readers
5 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
| /c/CFB Poll Top 25 |  |
|---|---|
| 01. Oklahoma |  |
| ~~02. Georgia~~ |  |
| 03. Indiana |  |
| 04. Miami (FL) |  |
| 05. Texas Tech |  |
| 06. Ohio State |  |
| ~~07. LSU~~ |  |
| 08. Ole Miss | |
| 09. Oregon |  |
| 10. Texas A&M |  |
| 11. Vanderbilt |  |
| ~~12. Penn State~~ | |
| ~~13. USC~~ |  |
| T-14. Missouri |  |
| T-14. Georgia Tech |  |
| 16. Iowa State |  |
| ~~17. Florida State~~ |  |
| ~~18. Mississippi State~~ |  |
| T-19. Texas |  |
| T-19. Tennessee | |
| 21. Houston |  |
| 22. Michigan |  |
| T-23. Alabama | |
| T-23. BYU |  |
| 25. Maryland |  |
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't know an extensive list, but my understanding is that this is the result of reworking the current windows. In other words they had every opportunity to make it a much better system and I don't think that they have.
Sounds like another case of:
Disappointing? Yes.
Surprising? No.
As someone who doesn’t pay attention to any portal or transfer stuff - why is this a miss? What should they be doing instead?
A single transfer portal window in early January is still during the season for most teams over .500, if they're doing a single window it should absolutely be during the actual off season.