this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

944 readers
5 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
01. Oklahoma Oklahoma
~~02. Georgia~~ Georgia
03. Indiana Indiana
04. Miami (FL) Miami
05. Texas Tech Texas Tech
06. Ohio State Ohio State
~~07. LSU~~ LSU
08. Ole Miss Mississippi
09. Oregon Oregon
10. Texas A&M Texas A&M
11. Vanderbilt Vanderbilt
~~12. Penn State~~ Penn State
~~13. USC~~ USC
T-14. Missouri Missouri
T-14. Georgia Tech Georgia Tech
16. Iowa State Iowa State
~~17. Florida State~~ Florida State
~~18. Mississippi State~~ Mississippi State
T-19. Texas Texas
T-19. Tennessee Tennessee
21. Houston Houston
22. Michigan Michigan
T-23. Alabama Alabama
T-23. BYU BYU
25. Maryland Maryland

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Manibusan@fanaticus.social
orangeNgreen@fanaticus.social
ToasterOverlord@fanaticus.social
orangeNgreen@lemmy.world
g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world
game_bot@fanaticus.social
m0d0fm15ch13f@fanaticus.social
4
[Dellenger] NCAA football Oversight Committee votes to support single January transfer portal window (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world to c/cfb@fanaticus.social
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What a massive miss!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] superduperpirate@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What were the other options under consideration?

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know an extensive list, but my understanding is that this is the result of reworking the current windows. In other words they had every opportunity to make it a much better system and I don't think that they have.

[–] superduperpirate@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like another case of:

Disappointing? Yes.

Surprising? No.