this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
194 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

7323 readers
769 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The EU is planning to strike a deal with the US that would let the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies search European databases to identify people posing β€œa threat to US security,” according to a proposal published by the European Commission at the end of July.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Literal treason. When are we going to learn that we live in capitalist dictatorships and our governments are not like us?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I see it more like a defensive thing for Europeans in the States. An effort to assure safety from being wrongly accused or detained. It gives these people clear legal grounds if/when US immigration does it's thing. It is hard to get away with their bullshit when they are provided a channel of transparency. They would have to willfully ignore something that is so blatant. If they do, their mallace is even more exposed.

Should it have ever come to this? Of course not. But stations like that were passed long ago and the train isn't stopping.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What about we start treating the US as we treat North Korea and people that travel there do it at their own risk, instead of exposing everyone to the American Gestapo?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It'll get there t this rate. But not quite yet. That sort of action happens about two years too late, so we have about five to go.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This together with German politicians wanting to have a list of all transgender people that change their name is really cool! Awesome! I love it!

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't you already have that for when anyone changes their name?

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only under special circumstances are they allowed to access this information. There is not one big database for every federal agency to browse through willy nilly.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago

"Posing a threat to US security"

Me a socialist: hahaha im in danger (again)!

[–] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The article seems misleading. The proposal linked by article itself is part of a visa-free program, and the exchange would focus on travelers to the US, applicants for immigration/humanitarian benefits in the US, individuals encountered by DHS law enforcement in a border and immigration context in the US. It's far from that "Millions of innocent Europeans in police databases" mentioned in the article.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So you believe in the sincerity of US intelligence agencies, that even if they have access to everybody's police record they're gonna limit the surveiling to the ones with a plane ticket already bought? History tells a very different story.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 10 points 1 week ago

Does the linked proposal say that the US intelligence agencies get access to everybody's record, or just to the ones with a plane ticket?

I think this just gives them the right to request a certain person’s information, not just read it all

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How is it misleading? That's what I read in the article. And that's probably actually "Millions of innocent Europeans in police databases". These are not exclusive affirmations?

A quick search tells me just about 2 million Germans visited USA in 2024. Which is actually much more than I expected.

[–] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is it misleading?

The tone of the article seems to suggest a massive and unprecedented sharing of data, but in reality it’s going to concern only travellers to the US in a process alternative to requesting a visa that already requires sharing data. Moreover, traveling to the US is a choice.

If the US require that data, Europe can choose to say no, but then the US can choose to close the borders. That may be what you want, but million people would probably disagree with you.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most EU countries already participate in the Visa Waiver Program. This agreement is about extending it to 3 more countries in the union and ...

Where the objective of an exchange of information under a PCSC agreement is to fight terrorism and serious crime, the purpose of the exchange of information under the EBSP is potentially broader as it also concerns the areas of border management and visa policy.

... extend the content of exchanged data. So, yes, the article is right?

[–] JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yes, the article is right?

I never said it wasn’t, just misleading. I’d say clickbaiting too.

One thing is to say that the US will have access to more data about EU travellers to the US, another is to say that the US will have direct access to EU databases.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

That's true. The title might lead to think of a generalised access. The data exchange is not defined yet, and that is the work to be done as stated in the paper you linked. Annex, point 3:

In particular, the framework agreement should provide clear and precise rules and procedures for triggering a query on a traveller, to preclude a systematic, generalised and non-targeted processing of data for all travellers.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Whatever the possibly good, but probably bad, intentions there are to this decision, it's still courting disaster.

Let's say your neighbor beats half of their kids and all of their kids' friends. And this neighbor is not shy about it; in fact, they publicly brag about this. And let's say that they tell you that your kids should come over to play some video games, but that you need to introduce your kids to them first, so that they don't accidentally beat your kids.

You know what you do in that situation? You don't let your kids visit the fucking child-abuse house!

Don't let your government share your data with us. We're definitely going to abuse your data, and we're still gonna arrest you when you visit. We're holding a burning fuse in our closed fistβ€”don't get closer to see if we're gonna blow our hand off. Run away as fast as you can before you get our mess on yourself.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

FUCK THAT, THIS IS ILLEGAL

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Excuse le fucking moi?!?!

[–] NanoooK@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

What, the, fuck. What's happening with european leaders, they keep giving everything to america.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago