this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
400 points (99.3% liked)

News

32290 readers
4619 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump has picked Jim O’Neill, a former investor and critic of health regulations serving under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to take control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, following a tumultuous week in which the agency’s director was forced out.

O’Neill, Kennedy’s deputy at the Department of Health and Human Services, will supplant Susan Monarez, a longtime government scientist who had been the CDC director for less than a month.

Monarez’s lawyers said she refused “to rubber-stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts.”

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 96 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

O’Neill suggested drug effectiveness could be established after they hit the market.

That's definitely never caused any problems in the past.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide_scandal

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Americans are going to become the world's test rats on medicine safety (they're already are on food).

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It'll be interesting because the FDA is considered to be very strict internationally, and when a drug is approved here it a lot easier to get it approved in other countries. That is going to change very soon.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Clearly we can’t allow people like Francis Kelsey to hurt the stock price of nazi-run companies like Grünenthal.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 weeks ago

Let me see, where did I put that... Aha!

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would someone in the pedo party need man made islands outside of US territory...

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Who's to say really?

Richard Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney and estate manager might know, but for some reason nobody really seemed to pick up on this story the Atlantic published a few weeks ago

Parlatore told me during a brief conversation. He added that Indyke’s “experience on the legal side of the Epstein business was valuable.” For instance, Indyke knows how to structure financial arrangements and purchase aircraft, Parlatore said. “I hired him because of that.”

Those kinds of financial skills are what the two women who sued Indyke allege were at the heart of Epstein’s criminal enterprise. In his bio, Indyke touts his experience “as general counsel to family offices, serial entrepreneurs, investors, and other ultra-high-net-worth clientele.” He doesn’t mention Epstein. Among his other capabilities: “Complex business and commercial transactions,” as well as “aviation, marine, and other exotic asset purchases, sales, and operation.”

Last I heard democratic congressman Ro Kahnna (who is also invested in Palantir) was pushing very hard to get Richard Indyke and Epstein's other executor (his former accountant) to testify before Congress about the Epstein birthday book. I'm sure whatever testimony they provide will be very trustworthy.

NYT also tried to bring attention to the executors of Epstein's estate earlier this summer bc of the millions of dollars they're still making from the investments Epstein made with Thiel's company.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Hahaha. I remember the 90s and how the Libertarian-inflected idea of building floating island(s) - seasteading - was all the rage with that bunch. Even as someone in the Libertarian mindset (as I was at the time), it seemed a bit out there, even for those with more money than sense.

I know the idea predated the 90s, but for some reason, it seemed to take on a different...tone...than some of the 60s utopian/futurist visions. It seemed a bit dark even back in the 90s and that was back when the (commercial) Internet still felt it had a lot of hope and promise beyond just "make shit-tons of money for the already wealthy".

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

Coverage of "The Principality of Sealand" and the popularity of Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon probably contributed to the enthusiasm, as well as to the creation of Bitcoin.

[–] joker125@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ryan’s intro is a great sales pitch but the real story is in the tapes left by maintenance guys complaining about leaky plumbing and shit that never gets fixed just to save a penny.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Best part is some of them are still trying, Adam Something did a couple videos on it and frankly speaking shit hit the fan rather quick in several cases. Inclusing at least one instance where the Thai government boarded and seized one of the prototype badly build floating houses. I refuse to call it a house boat because it being a boat would imply respectable engineering quality.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They have moved on to Network Cities. They are working to make a city state somewhere near Singapore right now. It's called Network School, for tech optimists and digital nomads.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember back then coming across a proposed "constitution" someone had posted on the Internet for one of these sea-steaded micronations. It was presented as a contract rather than a constitution, every citizen was supposed to literally sign on to it (or be treated as a non-citizen). It was zany. Hundreds of pages, with all sorts of minutiae. The main bit I remember was the rather large section that was the equivalent of the American second amendment, it had detailed rules about what kinds of landmines one was allowed to put on one's property.

A constitutional right to place landmines, on a seastead micronation that would no doubt have rather constrained living space.

I'm generally in favour of personal liberties and all that, I can see how libertarianism can appeal as something that seems like a reasonable idea. But it's so easy for it to just go careening wildly off the edge of reasonableness into territory like this.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ha! That rings a bell. Somewhere back in the mists of time, I wonder if I ran across the same thing. Or I seem to remember something about a contract, and I thought there was also a component of buying into it with large amounts of money to help fund it. Sort of like a proto-GoFundMe project.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's interesting to see where it's gone. There are enough techbro billionaires and multi-millionaires now that if it were feasible at scale in the long run, someone would have pulled it off.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I remember a lot of vague circle-jerk kind of conversations about it on USENET, and that was before a lot of billions were made by the likes of Thiel...I mean, besides the engineering aspect, I don't know what would be in it for the typical human being who is not a decamillionaire+ to join up and be part of some weird cult/Ayn Randian human experiment? Just to be "free" of current nation-states and join a new one?

On a related note, I started reading The Sovereign Individual since it apparently inspires so much of these fucking whack-a-doodles with wayyyyy too much money than is good for the world, and .... wow. I recommend everyone check it out since it's quite the ride at least so far.

No wonder these dipsticks like the ideas in there, since it is hitting every note that someone with way too much money and notions of grandiosity would just looooove. I'm not sure how well this stuff dovetails with the likes of what Curtis Yarvin is spewing, but I think it doesn't come in direct conflict with his "ideas", LOL.

In a word - these people are fucking nuts. I'd love to see some way to wrest a lot of money, and therefore, power away from them, since they hold way too much sway over the rest of us.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They should just live on the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Behold the Network State!

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those 4 particles per cubic meter are gonna have to do some heavy lifting

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

"The Man from Purdue"