this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
40 points (95.5% liked)

Android

20124 readers
144 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 39 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This entire article is naively assuming Google is operating in good faith. Android already has this popup. If they want to change it to say "this could potentially be dangerous", I have no qualms with that.

But that's not what they want. They want to kill sideloading. It couldn't be more clear. And if they can't kill it, they want a piece of the action. They want to be more like Apple.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 2 hours ago

Absolutely this. This is a solution looking for a problem. There are plenty of obvious ways to make sideloading hard for the average user, but keeping it available to power users. This is not Google's goal. Google wants to play gatekeeper for their Android platform.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Same old sanewashing like anything else in today's media.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Doesnt sideloading already require manual steps to enable it, including a "pop-up"?

Who is accidentally sideloading apps without realizing it? Is that actually a thing that happens? I dont believe it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Can't speak to other Android versions but mine just asks something along the line of "Do you want to allow this app to install other apps?". There's not really any mention of potentially malicious software. So I don't doubt some old people are being told by scammers to install some scammy app.

But the solution is not to create more "trusted" nonsense, it's to improve the disclosures.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Except the scammers have no problems getting apps approved by google. A lot of scams will use something like anydesk or teamviewer. While im sure it can happen, ive never in all of scambaiting seen a scammer resort to needing to sideload anything.

[–] LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works 31 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone who installs apps outside of Google Play, already knows, that these apps are not verified by Google.

In the best case it will be just a next annoying pop-up. However it's such a straightforward idea, I think Google thought about it earlier and intentionaly won't add this option.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

I had to go out of my way to install the app for my huawei watch after they removed it from the play store. Not only a popup like in other pkgs but also allow it in another menu. Security is not the reason Google wants this new restriction.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I think Google thought about it earlier and intentionaly won’t add this option

This is very likely true. Samat is almost certainly engaging malicious PR.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So 100,000 shitty data harvesting apps are fine - but we can’t let another ICEBlock get published without having a throat to choke

Fuck you Google for kneeling you fucking bitches

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago

King T hasn't been a fan of big tech. This sounds like it could be part of the intent, but I wonder if there aren't better ways to appease a pathetic toddler like Apple's suck up gold trophy. It's an interesting choice for sure.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a very deseperate idea and one that will almost certainly not be implemented. If you are already at the bargaining stage where you are offering objectively bad and annoying alternatives then you've already lost.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yes, it does seem that alternatives like PostmarketOS and perhaps SailfishOS are the only real options.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

“Maybe it’ll use your Google account as the signature so you would be able to sign apps for yourself only. Still not a fan of that but better than taking away sideloading altogether.” 

The article said something I don't like in that it could be tied to a Google account, but for those of us who don't have and don't want a Google account, that would be a roadblock and effectively amount to the same thing.

Mind you, those of us who do not want, do not have, and do not desire to have a Google account, probably aren't using Google Apps and services on their device, and so they wouldn't have this anyway, but still.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago

Samat was doing damage control, trying to clarify Google’s position on the new developer identity requirements

The article uses "damage control". I wonder if the pushback Google has gotten on this is really enough to warrant the term damage control.

[–] cron@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

I don‘t think this popup is any improvement to the current situation. Users that are tricked into installing malware already see a similar popup - and despite the warnings, tens of thousands of devices are getting infected with malware this way.