this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
164 points (96.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9748 readers
178 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thousands of children and innocent civilians are killed by a fascist, genocidal government, and a jihadi group.

Won't someone think of the shareholders

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You may be dying in agony of radiation poisoning - but as long as your portfolio holds its value, it's all worthwhile!

(Didn't read the article. Paywall.)

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Yet in a sense, this has little financial relevance, since in a nuclear conflagration your portfolio’s performance would be unlikely to rank highly among your priorities

Last paragraph

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought this had to be one the of the parody news sites for sure. WTF.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Right! I saw this in a political web comic this morning. WTF.

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Death, it means death. That's it, there's nothing else. As the quote goes, "I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones"

[–] awnery@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is it not the next 'world war' if it doesn't include nukes? i don't think the stupid war shit is quite there yet, but it's happening.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a Middle East driven world war could have zero to very few nukes...

Europe driven? Kiss your butt goodbye.

[–] awnery@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you're not the real 'poem for your sprog' person. i don't exactly disagree with you, but i wonder why you chose that specific handle. you aren't a poet. what are you doing?

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] awnery@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'm not pretending to be someone i'm not.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Neither am I?

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Profile pic checks out

[–] Then_I_said@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago

You know. I get that this is a boring dystopia. But it makes sense for an economic magazine (one that has been around since the first two world wars) to talk about the economic aspects of a looming world war.

It even acknowledges in the article (more than once) that financial concerns are far down the priority list in such a case. But that as a financial publication, this is their purview so they're focusing there.

There's a bit in the article in the direction of "war introduces such radical levels of uncertainty that even past occurrences provide few lessons to learn from". (Can't get a direct quote.. returned to article to be stopped by paywall) It goes on to say that this uncertainty is heightened because any future world war will involve nuclear powers.

I hope that knowledge of the level of uncertainty is enough to deter the spread of violence. But that hope may be as futile as hoping people would actually read the article

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Global conflicts have a habit of sneaking up on money-managers

Wow, not even a hint of satire.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The Investors?

Since when did they become a class unto themselves? Fucking investors got us here in the first place trying to keep the money flowing into the MIC supplying wars around the globe with the latest toys.

Thought this was a joke…thanks to the global logistical flow of goods, food, and materials a real WW3 will mean starvation, lack of medications, and collapse of all sorts of systems as materials, technology, and even clothing stop showing up in warehouses and stores.

[–] SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A third world war would mean the complete collapse of all global financial institutions within days, if not minutes.

The investors that survived would find themselves in a society that no longer had access to digital money, could only trade what you could physically hand over, and could only "own" what you can stop other survivors from taking from you.

[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A complete collapse of global financial institutions? Promise?

[–] explodicle@local106.com 5 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, we kept a backup of everyone's credit score in this bunker.

[–] bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

These headlines could be lifted straight from a newscast in Robocop and I wouldn't know the difference. What a world

[–] phikshun@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago