this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
137 points (98.6% liked)

World News

49793 readers
2212 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

public transit is a service, not a business. it does not need to make a profit.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ideally it should be supported without deficit or profit by its users. A lot of these old services also accumulate inefficiencies over time that should be pruned from time to time

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There’s a reason flights are so cheap compared to to rail, and it’s not good news for anybody except the CEOs of airline companies. TLDR: they’re subsidised and the fuel is subsidised to artificially price them below public transport. We could have cheap or even free public transport if we wanted using the same method.

https://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/issues/climate-energy/47717/low-cost-flights-up-to-26-times-cheaper-than-trains/

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh man. I wish that'd work where I live (Canada). Europeans don't realize how lucky they have it! I can't fly to any worthwhile countries and back in a day (at least not long enough to enjoy the stay)

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

An old colleague of mine worked at a different office - he got fed up of the rat run and took a job within a stone's throw of Stansted Airport - close enough that a hotel or carpark shuttle bus covered his route.

He couldn't be arsed with London and Essex house prices so he bought his house near Shannon (yes, in the Republic of Ireland) and commuted by plane every day. The major problem with that was if he didn't book a flight when they were released (where it was about fifteen or twenty quid return!), or if there was a short notice job came in that changed his hours, he was royally fucked and it cost him a fortune.

I should imagine his carbon footprint was somewhere between "Chinese concrete factory" and "literally burning petrol in the back garden for a laugh".

A friend of a friend did something similar in east London - couldn't be holed with the London house prices so got a place in some Paris suburb and commuted by train most mornings, only staying over if there was a staff night out or a late working task planned.

...and I sometimes complain about my ten mile commute.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

I work remotely, but when I have to go into the office, it takes half an hour. I walk.

My son's commute to his workplace is four minutes. He also walks.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

£7.50 for a flight? That's insane! I'd be going on vacation once a month if I could score a single flight for even 10x that.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oftentimes, it was even more wild than that. One flight may have been ten or twelve quid; and the other flight might have been three or four quid. Granted this was ten or fifteen years ago; but some of the low-cost carrier flights were insanely low.

There's still some crazy low prices to be had if you live near a hub for a low cost carrier, like Stansted or Glasgow Prestwick.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can hardly even fly to another Canadian city without it costing an arm and a leg.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

And an extra finger too, if you want to choose where you sit!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Be tempted to look south my man

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd like to visit Mexico sometime, but it wouldn't really work for a day trip

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I seriously think we need to ask serious questions if we're able to shift people point to point further, faster by first going 4 miles towards space for a fraction of the price of moving more people at once on an electrified railway stopping at multiple destinations, picking up and dropping off along the way.

Something cannot be right. How can they not compete and be profitable? What am I missing?

Outside of major cities in the UK trains tickets are ludicrously priced.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Planes don't have to maintain the sky, but trains need to maintain the rails.

Essentially any costs that can be externalized & paid by the public with air travel have been, like maintaining airports, etc.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Airlines pay landing fees though, they definitely aren't using the airport for free.

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, but from A to B the plane does not use man made infrastructure and planes are for longer journeys than typical trains. Two airports cost a lot less than the constant maintenance of hundreds of miles of tracks, signaling, crossings, bridges and tunnels, forest overgrowth etc. plus the road infrastructure needed to maintain all parts of the train track corridor, even if it's a dirt road, it needs minimum maintenance.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

You are correct, but I think the airports are privately owned though, it's just they need a lot less to maintain them in relative terms.

[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well. In the UK the rails and infrastructure used to be privately owned. But it turned out a private company couldn't be trusted with that level of safety within their remit. So it returned to government control quite some tine ago.

The train companies are private though. Well except for a handful that failed to meet requirements.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the rails and infrastructure used to be privately owned. But it turned out a private company couldn’t be trusted with that level of safety within their remit

Google Ladbroke Grove and Hatfield rail crashes if you wanna know more.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I remember why. I was considering including links to some of the causes of the end of railtrack. But I thought it shouldn't really come as a surprise to those already here that private companies and safety are seldom bedfellows.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I...don't blame them? If people prefer flying, which usually consist of at least an hour of waiting before taking off and the flight time, which sometime could be longer than, vs train, then there's something seriously bad happen to the train. The article mentioned £150 on train without a seat, if that's true then that's a serious issue, for both the price and seat.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely mental regarding the cost of public transport in most of Blighty...

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's pretty immoral in the current day and age, but it is something that should be made (near) impossible with better regulation until it can be done with a reasonable carbon cost

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking airline companies leeching on government opportunities, fucking train companies that treat train travel as a luxury (ex: fucking Thameslink which is expensive and yet only has seat treys in its first class) and governments not giving train lines the same benefits they give to airline companies are all complicit in environmental crimes.