this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
190 points (96.1% liked)

News

31932 readers
2622 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I am so confused as to why anyone gives a fucking shit about this.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

People are bored because their lives are easy. That will change soon.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

same thing happened with the sydney sweeney ad. all i care about is them titties

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

oh man. so thankful. just biting my nails about the cracker barrel logo.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 106 points 4 days ago
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 20 points 3 days ago

Wait a minute. The logo is literally a cracker and a barrel 🤣. I'm surprised conservatives are ok being made fun of.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 86 points 4 days ago (19 children)

The reaction has been absurd, but their new logo was definitely awful.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

I don't think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don't want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.

But...their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.

EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren't happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was "calm down, it'll be okay", but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.

EDIT2: They'd also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the "Old Country Store" text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.

EDIT3: Here's a more-comprehensive history:

https://dwglogo.com/cracker-barrel-logo/

1000009253

[–] errer@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I do find it amusing that the “classic” logo everyone is pining for is from the “ancient” year of 1997…

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Tbf as weird as it sounds, ‘97 is vintage now

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Officially 28 years ago

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 8 points 3 days ago

I hate you for pointing that out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mememuseum@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

If they'd just textured the background shape to actually look like a barrel it would be pretty good actually.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

According to another site, the logo was 1977, not 1997. Which tracks with another article mentioning a marketing person coming up with the design in the 70s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Kinda wish the public had a similar outrage when Fruit of the Loom modernized their logo in 2000, lol

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

I'm more upset about Mr Pringle.

Lost not only his hair, but the twinkle in his eye, poor chap.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I just wish they didn't try to gaslight humanity into believing there was never a cornucopia

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 28 points 3 days ago

No bigger snowflake than a MAGAt.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not conservative in the slightest and I thought the redesign was completely ass.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, but did you go unhinged calling it "woke"? The logo was a poor fit and I could get behind it, but so many MAGAs losing it over calling a lame logo "woke"....

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago

The whole restaurant is complete ass.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 days ago

I will continue to not care at all about it. Release the Epstein files.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 35 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Thank god! Now can we get back to the important issues? How's that WAR ON CHRISTMAS going?

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The war on Christmas CANNOT END until Christmas ceases its illegal occupation of November.

We are once again calling on the Claus regime to return to their side of the borders outlined in the Black Friday agreement.

November? I think you forgot to include September and October.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (8 children)

I've never seen people freak out so hard over a LOGO change. Jesus, it's not like they changed the typeface to Comic Sans or Papyrus or some shit!

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

Because everything in the United States has been turned into "us vs them" crap.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Bunch of snowflakes wanting their safe space

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Lol.

Boomer oriented company chooses to stay in business for a few more years until boomers are all gone.

I went into a Cracker Barrel once. 90% elderly.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 32 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Was it really conservative backlash? I don't think anyone liked it, lol.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Non-conservatives give a shit about cracker barrel?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I gotta meet up with the old people in my family somewhere. I'm not having them in my house are you crazy

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Who gives a shit about a logo??? Companies can do whatever the hell they want with their logos so shut up about it and start asking: WHERE'S THE EPSTEIN FILES???

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ALLHAILHYPNOTOAD@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 days ago

I am so sick of these whiny snow flake conservatives and their complete lack of self-awareness.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The backlash from the racist bigots you mean. Where else are they going to go after church to be mean to the wait staff

[–] Saffire@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The title already says Conservative though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 19 points 4 days ago

Called it. They new coke'd that shit.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just what we needed. Conservatives feeling even more empowered. Goddamnit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

Were it not for the whiny fucking losers and their incessant bitching and moaning over everything, I wouldn't have know nor cared.

I still don't care.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

Complained about the redesign, isn't Conservative How dare you insult me like this? I am an American and I will not stand for being called a Nazi.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Huh. I guess crackers like representation too.

load more comments
view more: next ›