this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
123 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

41300 readers
525 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two former Harvard students are launching a pair of “always-on” AI-powered smart glasses that listen to, record, and transcribe every conversation and then display relevant information to the wearer in real time. 

“Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,” said AnhPhu Nguyen, co-founder of Halo, a startup that’s developing the technology. 

Or, as his co-founder Caine Ardayfio put it, the glasses “give you infinite memory.” 

“The AI listens to every conversation you have and uses that knowledge to tell you what to say … kinda like IRL Cluely,” Ardayfio told TechCrunch, referring to the startup that claims to help users “cheat” on everything from job interviews to school exams.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

TLDR; Two wannabe tech bros drop out of college to make yet another pair of smart glasses that will fail because nobody wants it.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is dropping out of Harvard considered something to brag about now?

[–] ckmnstr@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

In the tech bro / VC world "Harvard Dropout" equates to an MD title in a hospital. It's instant credibility.

[–] pieman@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

literally them: 🤓

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they "drop outs" or were they 'asked' to leave the establishment?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thiel/Yarvin/ acolytes probably. I didn't look up who owns the VC funds but I expect no one not sociopathic.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does anyone not sociopathic own a VC fund?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago

"Vulture Capitalist" funds?

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Did we not fucking learn anything from Black Mirror?

"The Entire History of You?"

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right wing people seem to have no media literacy.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wish someome would ELI5 media literacy. So if I see an article, but I can read between the lines and know what it really means, or that it is sensationalized click bait, am I media literate? Or does it mean I am aware of trackers and surveillance on everything? Does it mean I know to check international news sources to be more well rounded?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago

Well, there's https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_literacy but that's not written for children

I don't think, of your examples, trackers and surveillance are a big part of it. Understanding subtext and credibility are more relevant. Like, recognizing when a newspaper always uses passive voice when cops do bad (eg: "man killed after violent police encounter" vs "police fatally shoot man waiting at bus stop"), but active voice for other people (eg: "Looters destroy small business shops" vs "Downtown shops damaged during anti-corruption protests")

Also in fiction, being able to take away more than just the plot. Like you can read Dracula as just a book about a guy that bites people, but there are way more ways to read it. When someone makes a movie out of the story, notice what parts they keep, emphasize, and drop.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, how did you know that's why I couldn't read that?

[–] root@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Black mirror is no longer sci-fi. It is slowly becoming a documentary. - Louis Rossman

[–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 4 points 1 week ago

People missed those are warnings. They have no imagination so they took those as advices or even manuals. In a sense, they learnt.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ew, spyware. This def violates GDPR

[–] Libb@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

“Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,”

A bit too late guys, as glasses have always made anyone look super intelligent. If that wasn't the case, why would anyone want to wear them? Because that's the only reason I wear mine, and certainly not because I'm as blind as a bat when I don't.

More seriously, their plan is to kill IRL conversations by making it impossible to trust anyone we would directly talk to?

Impressive. Sad & frightening, but impressive.

Also, I wonder who they will blame the moment they realize the hell they will have made of everybody's interactions?

edit: typos

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sucks for glasses wearers who are about to be having a lot of blurry conversations when everyone starts to tell everyone to take off their glasses before they talk.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Yep, the first thing I imagined: how shitty would it be to not be able to see who I'm talking to... because I value my (and other's) privacy I would ask them to not wear their glasses and would not be wearing mine ;)

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If their glasses make you "super intelligent" when you put them on, then maybe they should put on their own product and finish school? That was my line of thinking, until I got to this part of the article:

Ardayfio called the glasses “the first real step towards vibe thinking.”

...and then I realized I have no idea what the hell they're talking about and stopped reading.

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago

What the Hell even is that?

[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

You won't even have to think anymore, let AI think for you!, you'll be thoughtless and content

[–] timmytbt@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sad thing is that people will buy this shit

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

i'm glad that my own vanity will prevent me from getting these. lol

[–] SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't Google try this and canned the project after nobody wanted to wear them or be recorded all the time?

[–] McWizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

There's a nice marketing explanation for it: https://youtube.com/shorts/moaeyoc2NI4

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems likely to run afoul of two-party consent laws.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

“Move fast and break things” - arrogant fucks

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

LTT did a hands on with a similar product, the Frame by Brilliant Labs. It sucked.
I do not expect this to fare any better.

[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

let me know when some dropout has an idea that's actually novel with sound engineering to back it up.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Are they trying to evoke the Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs vibe by saying Harvard dropouts? Do they not realize that those are HORRIBLE people no one should ever look up to?