this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
312 points (97.0% liked)

World News

49170 readers
2446 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Faltering empires always flail about militarily. Part of the death throes.

That said. It would almost be worth him doing it just to see what happens when Mexico invokes Article 5.

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 16 points 17 hours ago
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

Oh, well thats nice of them, I guess. Who is Mexico attacking?

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, roght out of Isreals play book, invade a country on the basis of eliminating terrorists/gangs

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ehm... the US doesn't need to use someone's else's copy of the book they wrote.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much every nation with an army has attack plans against its' neighbours, just in case. Actually using them, of course, is quite another thing. Unless you need to be really on your toes because of an unpredictable, aggressive and vicious southern neighbour like -not to name anyone- Austria.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Most other countries aren't currently ran by a dementia addled pedophile who's desperate to become a king.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When current news gives you flashbacks to the Cyberpunk 2077 lore. The names and dates are different but the trends and events match enough to give the uncanny feeling. Agencies in the streets being deployed, USA in trade war losing irrelevance, going for the Central American war and then losing. By the way, that's why cybernetic limbs got so good, they needed them to patch up the soldiers from that war.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How does one lose irrelevance?

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

By gaining relevance!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mortoc@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Anything to distract from the Epstein files.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago

Are those similar to the Trump-Epstein files?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

drawing up

Doesn't DoD have detailed attack plans for every nation already?

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes but this is a bad headline. The article is about specifically using US military to attack cartels, which the Trump administration has already made legal for themselves by recategorizing them as terrorists.

It is still a violation of both international law and common sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes.

Well, not necessarily detailed. Like I'm sure the plan for an invasion of Uruguay is basically nonexistent, while one for war with China is comprehensive.

Plans for a zombie apocalypse have also been created at least once as an exercise. It's good practice for an emergency situation.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Airborne Rabies wouldn't be that dissimilar from zombies. Pretty sure there's a tabletop for that.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We've got that in Australia!

note: It's 'not rabies' (it's Bat Lyssavirus, which is 'totally not rabies'*) and it's 'airborne' since they're bats :P

[–] philpo@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

In the US they have bats with actual Rabies...sooo....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The US isn’t ready for a two front war where the whole world wants to get rid of them. They don’t have the cards.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Please... I'm not a big fan of the US right now either. But that is just an absurd claim. No one is going to willingly open up a front against the US.

Like it or not, but they absolutely have the cards.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Canada would know that if the US attacks Mexico then it would be next, that would be the only time to fight.

There isn’t a choice, this means Europe joins.

Europe joining means China will join so that it can replace the US in Europe.

Mexico at war is going to bring many countries below it in because they don’t want to be the next smaller country on the US doorstep.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

Canada isn't a smuggle route worth billions.

The only reason they could even potentially go into Mexico is due to the Cartels and their billion dollar drug trade. (I don't have facts saying it's a billion dollar drug trade. But I'm making an educated guess that's it's worth a shit ton of money)

There is just no way in hell Canada would ever strike first on the US and be the aggressor. Even if Canada would strike at the US, why the hell would Europe side with Canada? They are now the aggressor. Attacking a fellow NATO member no less.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 minutes ago

The realism of my previous statement, no one would view it as a strike first, it’s retaliation for attacking Mexico.

The alternative is to just get picked off one by one.

After Canada comes Denmark so be realistic about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (13 children)

He's trying to imitate Putin. Probably go about as well as it has for Putin as well.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why? What's even the end goal? A war to stay in office maybe?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Martial Law is definitely on his wishlist.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

If this was a competent president. I would probably give them the benefit of the doubt.

But we all know Trump only cares about one thing. And it's not the US. It's himself.

He may very well be under the impression that it will somehow give him more time in office, or it's just some way for him to try and get better approval rating. How he is percieved by the US is of major importance to his ego.

He hates how his approval is lower than Obamas. And he probably hates how his approval is lower than G.W.Busch.

G.W.Busch had an approval rating of around ~60%. Then a certain incident happened and his approval went to as high as 92% at a certain time.

Trump might, for some reason. Think that him starting/provoking a war will give him a similar boost.

Ofc to you and me it sounds insane and we know that's not going to improve his rating. But we are reasonable, normal people with common sense.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

if and when he feels like it

I hate that this is an actionable threat.

load more comments
view more: next ›