this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
524 points (97.6% liked)

politics

25186 readers
2713 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Morons.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Hey, if you support a syphilitic pedophile rapist lying grifter, you deserve all the shit he unleashes on you.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Their idea of swamp was just democrats/city folk. They would just never believe that putting in their people would be just as swampy if not worse.

They might not like the Epstein shit but they’re not asking for all those bureaucrats and judges he placed to be removed. They’d still vote for Rubio, or whatever racist corpse gets the next nomination.

Glad they’re free of this particular blindness but they’ve got a long way to go.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 6 points 5 days ago

USA today is a rightwing propaganda rag and this is rightwing propaganda

"my peers aren't country club conservatives" shut the fuck up you are literally writing for the largest syndicated colonial newspaper network

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tired of hearing "Demographic Group X did Y" when these analyses fall apart at the state line.

There's no chromosome that explains your vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Vanishingly small percentage of fucking idiots later realize they've been conned. Film at 11.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

And I highly doubt they even realise it. They are fucking idiots after all.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Yup Gen Z men are kinda naive.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean...they were 19, at the oldest, when the first Trump term began. Now they're between 13 and 28. So I understand being ignorant of what came before.

But seriously...if you don't know what came before, don't vote.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm pretty sure I had learned about 1930s-40s Germany before I was old enough to vote.

Our public education system has been purposely broken. The fascists have sabotaged our own future and ability to innovate and compete on the world stage in any way... But hey, they don't know about Nazis anymore, so it's a lot easier for them to take power. That's what matters.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

Oh noez, are a lot of our voting public stupid fucking idiots? What a shocker.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›