this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
824 points (96.4% liked)

News

31466 readers
3078 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Revealed? Did no one read Project 2025m

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Honestly, it felt like reading Alice in wonderland on crack. By the time I got to the end it was all so fucking crazy I couldn't remember most of what was in it

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Nobody reads anything longer than a paragraph, nobody watches anything longer than a youtube short linked on facebook.

We are here because we allowed comfort and convenience to rot all our collective brains. We are all accountable, we all had a role to play, even if tiny. We could have rallied together, we could have pushed community action and worked harder to preserve progressive ideology. We could have stopped giving so much freedom to the people trying to take away all our freedom. We could have stopped buying shiny new phones and cars and demanded products that last and union protections for our workers.

But no, we thought it was funny when 4channers started screaming about how evil feminists were and laughed it off instead of having their nests burnt down and we instead started our decades-long obsession scrolling for dopamine instead of involving ourselves with the people who run our communities.

If we had claimed the flag, if we had been the ones screaming about our rights to own guns and how we wanted to make america great, if we had been the ones getting arrested for plowing our cars into groups of nazis, we would be the ones with the muscle right now setting social policy. But just saying that is probably setting off some of ya'll and that's what the problem is.

I promise you, the other side isn't balking at rhetoric like that and are actively encouraging it, and have won every round because of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dagwood_Sanwich@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elections are safe and secure. This was established in 2020, so there is nothing to see here.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't think that degree of optimism is justified.

My notes on this are a little old, but:

No VRA protections, voter purges/caging (Crosscheck), targeted disenfranchisement & gerrymandering, insecure/unauditable voting machines, undermined census, and gaming the electoral college, all impact the fairness of our elections, on top of the naive first-past-the-post implementation.

  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/20/this-anti-voter-fraud-program-gets-it-wrong-over-99-of-the-time-the-gop-wants-to-take-it-nationwide/
  • https://capitolfax.com/2017/10/13/dem-house-members-want-state-to-withdraw-from-flawed-national-voter-registration-crosscheck-system/
  • https://capitolfax.com/2017/10/19/accidental-and-apparently-harmless-password-leak-could-prompt-move-away-from-crosscheck-program/
  • http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article184229328.html
  • https://www.thenation.com/article/house-republicans-just-voted-to-eliminate-the-only-federal-agency-that-makes-sure-voting-machines-cant-be-hacked/
  • https://apnews.com/af2f0ede054d8baebbe1bb6ca47b4895
  • https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/01/09/rnc-ballot-security-consent-decree-328995
[–] Dagwood_Sanwich@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, no, this was established in 2020. SAFE AND SECURE! Don't be an election denier!

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago
[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

JuSt VoTe NeXt TiMe!!!

And every time I tell people we won't get a vote they laugh at me. Holy fuck, people just don't get how severe and horrible this administration is. We can't remove them for abuse of law, we can barely counter their worst abuses just to have them win in the end, and we're about to have them as dictators for life with no voting.

I honestly think the only solution is to leave this damned country. But guess what, unless you have a decent amount of money, that's out, too.

We're fucked

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The problem is so much worse than voting. The last two election cycles showed the highest turnout of voters and young voters in recorded American history.

The problem was not that nobody voted, the problem was the voters had no idea what was going on or who to vote for because all our collective brains have scrolled right out our ears and people have atomized perspectives and don't interact with each other anymore, allowing our nation to curdle, to fester into a million little sub-groups where you face no challenges, no backlash, no accountability and your every delusion will have a fanbase.

We did all this while POURING money into the industrial complexes that only seek to sell you marginally better products that fall apart of become obsolete within a few years, powering the corporations that own our politicians.

The average median voter has no idea what's real or not, has no interest in policy, has no idea how policy even works or what our branches of government are, and has been scrolling for so long that they don't know how to be alone with their own thoughts. That's why Trump and his ilk are shredding the country apart right now. We didn't fight the idiots hard enough because we weren't social and involved enough to make them feel shame. We could have used shame as our mightiest weapon because they are radically insecure and scared of being shamed, but apparently our side was equally scared, so the dumb billionaires with too much wealth to even feel shame won out in the end.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 262 points 3 days ago (212 children)

Trump: convicted rapist, pedophile, misogynistic swine. Also failed businessman, pathological liar, corrupt to all hell. Sellout to Russia and the Nazis.

Harris: didn't condemn Israel.

Fuck off 'both sides'-ers

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 120 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Comment was reported for

Misinformation and genocide denial

I'm leaving this up.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 33 points 3 days ago (91 children)

This this this this this this this this.

I have zero goddamn sympathy for any so-called "leftist" who didn't vote for Kamala. You have condoned neo-facism to stroke your own ego. No two ways about it. At least now they get to enjoy the fruits of their labor. Tell me, how's that self-righteousness taste?

load more comments (91 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (22 children)

A vote for Trump is a vote to end America. It really is that simple. If there is one thing I hope future generations rally around and condemn is Trump voters. I hope they are shamed for eternity.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (209 replies)
[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not sure how much I can trust that source. And no right-winger will ever accept it either.

Anyone with a more direct link to a source about this?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, that article was kind of a mess., and you really have to already agree with it to stay along for the ride. Even as someone who shares their general perspective, I can't help but to get the same vibe as I do reading unhinged conservative outlets, just from a different side. The wiring style evokes a feeling more of unsubstantiated unhinged conspiracy theory than a concrete writeup.

A lot of time is spent name dropping organizations and you have to already know them to have any idea why you might want to care about them, but not saying concretely what exactly it is, just that it is hard right nonsense that every acronym they can mention is outraged over. They even name drop the UAW in a way that lets them type it in but without citing then on the actual current reality, because the UAW hasn't really come out against Trump.

When it gets to describing the actual "plan", it mostly still didn't explain exactly what it is talking about. It eventually gets to concretely mentioning two precise things, the requirement to prove citizenship in way that may be disproportionately difficult for people who had a name change, and an onerous voting certification. The rest of the elements are left too vague to try to understand.

This article may help keep up the attention and energy of folks already keeping up with this stuff, but anyone vaguely on a fence won't make it through the first paragraph without getting a bit skeptical, and almost certainly won't make it to the meat of the article before giving up and moving on to other articles.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Funny, the moment I read 'radical right' I got the exact same sense you did.

[–] maximumbird@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Anyone who is surprised hasn’t been paying attention.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The article says the constitution say a president can't change voting rules, but this president has the house, the senate and the judges.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which he probably only has control of because of voter fraud

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you are at all surprised by this I got some beach front property in Montana to sell you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 235 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (54 children)

Beginning to question the inherent wisdom of "Normal transition of power" when Biden handed the keys of the kingdom to a guy who openly planned to lock all the doors and shoot the next guy elected to walk through them.

But hey, I guess it would have been against the rules not to meekly empower a fascist dictatorship.

load more comments (54 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

"...So far, other than the report itself, by the Brennan Center for Law and Justice at New York University, there’s been little—or little-noticed—response. "

You heard it here first folks. PeoplesWor|d is sharing some groundbreaking news that nobody else is even willing to report!

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fucking Russia and CCP run China in the USA. That is some 3rd World crap right there and the Blue States should tell Canada to annex them ASAP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 27 points 2 days ago (9 children)

That's why I've started calling the country the Fascist States of America.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

What do you mean "revealed" as if this is news? I thought this was the plan the whole fucking time.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 88 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is what Alligator Auschwitz is really for.

America, your opportunity to stop this is narrowing and walking around with signs once a month on a weekend isn't gonna do it.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 97 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Every week, more people show up. I’m involved in local politics besides.

You’re slamming people for being involved. They are doing something being out there.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 101 points 3 days ago (14 children)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

What is in this article that we didn't already know? Is there any new legislation in process of being passed? This just sounds like the same playbook we used for the 2024 election to me.

load more comments
view more: next ›