432
Oh phew! I thought all the other things she did were what turned them against her. /S
Right? They didn’t care that she produced zero meaningful legislation or help any of their constituents. They don’t care about her lack of ethics or hypocrisy. They cared that she was caught doing teenager style shenanigans in public.
Nope, they didn't care about that either. Over a month after the fact they suddenly care because their internal polling shows her losing in 2024.
^ Boom. This right here. She skated in with 546 votes. Anyone remember the pics the night of the election? Her and her family clearly thought she lost.
I’m mildly encouraged that they still care about votes?
Guess they’ll have to gerrymander harder.
... with a drag-show hosting democrat.
That was the real offense. If that detail wasn’t true, the current story probably wouldn’t be one.
Which still surprises me--isn't that the kinda shit they normally do?!?
The problem is she might not be reelected, so the CO GOP want her to drop out so they can have someone else run.
They only care about keeping power. If her actions hadn't affected her polling, there would be crickets.
Her mistake was doing it with a Democrat. Had she been caught with a minor, the GOP would be heartily backing her.
Nah, her sin was barely winning. 500 votes I think was the line? No way she wins again and the GOP wants to get in from of that. This is the excuse.
Nah, her sin was barely winning. 500 votes I think was the line? No way she wins again and the GOP wants to get in from of that. This is the excuse.
It's post-Reagan America. Even if she loses her primary, she'll be set for life. A book deal, a movie deal, and countless TV appearances.
You forget just how bat-shit-insane she is. I could see her derailing her life like one of Norfolk's trains. I can easily imagine her mugshot and heavy charges for doing something blatantly illegal and insane.
So a reality show?
Oh god.. please don't give her any ideas....
Meh. Sure, she's gonna be able to leverage some of that stuff into a paycheck, but she squandered the influence of more powerful Republicans and generally acted like a spoiled child. Even MTG has more focus on the evil shit conservatives are doing and that's saying something.
Boebert isn't going to get near as many speaking invites and won't be able to charge anywhere near what other ejected Republicans can. Fucking Mike Flynn and the pillow man can charge more than boobert
I'm pretty sure her TV appearances are mostly going to be Newsmax and OAN.
And honestly, the only reason that CO repububs are being this open about ditching her is because everyone already knows her reelection bid is dead in the water. Dem Adam Frich lost by less than a thousand votes in the midterms and all projections anticipate him handily trouncing her in the next general. Its not because they actually care about her giving handies during Beetlejuice.
She was never going to get those speaker invites. Not because she is a shit show but because she never had the ability or talent to do her job. This is all she has and as such, she went full in with the innate abilities she has. From that perspective, I can understand her motivation. Work with what you have. Much like Trump.
What I can't understand is why anyone elects this shit.
From being a high school fail out to $100, 000.00 a year ? That's the new American Dream!!
I was literally just coming to comment something similar. With how mind numbingly stupid she is there is no way in hell she would deserve whatever board member seat she'll end up in after this ends. When we find out where she ends up we'll know who she's been beholden to this whole time.
Paying upfront is bribery, paying with a job after the fact somehow isn't...
Honestly jerking some dude off is the least bad thing she has done.
It's probably the nicest thing she's done.
She didn't have the courtesy to finish him off, so I'd still call it bad.
Yeah- not her shit policy, racism, or bigotry- but her behavior at a musical is what should cost her re-election.
The maga idiots loved her for policy, racism, and bigotry. She thought she was as untouchable as the impeached cheeto.
She should have opted for raping someone in a dressing room where there are no cameras.
Perfect time to bring this up, let's I'll the mass shooting manhunt, or that 220/220 Republicans just agreed a christofascist is the best option for 3rd in line to presidency. Why discuss these things when they happen when you can stuff it away for discussion when then time is more appealing to you. Fuck their cowardice.
By "Beetlejuice behavior," they're alluding to the fact that she shows up if you say her name three times.
She got caught canoodling with "the enemy". That's the line I guess.
These RINO's keep reaching across the aisle to touch democrats.
They're eating themselves.
The party of family values and personal responsibility, folks.
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
432 points (98.6% liked)
politics
18134 readers
3687 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS