this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
74 points (100.0% liked)

Science

23466 readers
101 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 31 minutes ago

does it work?

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

This is the third report I have heared of a mRNA nanotechnology based gene editing thrrepy come up o in the past few days. Did some lab just get some new grants or what? Did like a big journal just put out a quartlery issue?

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 11 points 7 hours ago

This would be super cool but I look forward to reading about how a pharma company somehow got ahold of all of the research docs and buried them twenty years from now.

[–] TheRogueKitten@hexbear.net 13 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

For the low, low price of $999,999.99.

They'll monetize it so fast and hard.

[–] iie@hexbear.net 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I’m optimistic on that front. First, this is public-sector research, and second, the approach seems inexpensive and hard to copyright. A lipid nanoparticle is not that special; there are multiple ways to formulate them (some are native to your body), and already there are (I assume) multiple competing firms that can produce them cheaply in large quantities, thanks in part to the pandemic. As for the mRNA sequence packaged inside the nanoparticles, I think if you publish that sequence in a research paper it’s considered factual information that cannot be copyrighted? And furthermore, there are probably multiple valid sequences that would work, maybe even a large number of them. I can’t imagine anyone getting a monopoly on something like this, especially with the enormous demand for it.

*I’m not an expert though, and it just occurred to me that, by the same logic, insulin should be cheap, but iirc it costs hundreds a month in the US

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 5 points 7 hours ago

The current study tests are actually priced around 2 mill so yk aim higher

[–] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

"It """cost"""* us 10 trillion dollars to develop and 100000 per dose*. Sorry peasant, just reality works!"

*Subsidized by the government and profits of other patents they "obtained". *100000 per dose in America, $1 per dose everywhere else.

(Its so cool that my prescriptions would be 1k+ for the 4th most common, ~20 year old anti-depressant, and what is (basically) literal meth.)

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 19 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Elias Sayour has spent a decade working to harness the power of mRNA science in order to effectively treat cancer.

Welp, when he gets deported I hope he puts his talents to good use somewhere he'll be better appreciated. Like China.

Yes, we are in fact stupid enough to deport valuable talent.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 18 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 23 points 9 hours ago

At the cost of US cancer patients no longer traveling to Cuba for a cancer vaccine, since they did it first a decade ago

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 14 points 10 hours ago

Florida finally doing something good for once?