this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
214 points (96.9% liked)

News

31081 readers
3344 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump campaigned on a vow to round up the "worst of the worst" offenders among the criminals who were living illegally inside the United States. But CBS News has obtained deportation data that indicates the Trump administration's deportation push has ensnared many undocumented immigrants without violent criminal records.

Of the estimated 100,000 people who were deported between January 1 and June 24 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 70,583 were convicted criminals, according to an ICE document obtained by CBS News. However, the data also shows that most of the documented infractions were traffic or immigration offenses.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The guy writing this article called traffic violations criminal offenses. I think they're stupid.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Any non-convicted criminals up in here?

...Anyone?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its almost like they're aren't actually any Boogeymen.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 12 points 3 days ago

Immigrants (regardless of status) commit crimes like 17x less or something than born citizens. The worst they can do to a citizen is fine them or throw them in jail. Immigrants have bigger things to worry about

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

most of the documented infractions were traffic or immigration offenses.

"Have you ever tried sugar or PCP?" --Mitch Hedberg

It makes perfect sense for deportees to be deported for immigration offenses--that's basically THE reason to deport someone in a country. Don't see anything controversial about that.

But it looks like "traffic" is thrown in (indeed, mentioned first) to make it sound more sensational--after all, that sentence is still technically accurate if it was 99% immigration offenses and 1% traffic offenses.

I got the feeling that if you considered traffic only, "most" would no longer be accurate, so I looked over the article. Lo and behold (or don't), no figure at all for traffic at all. Not even a mention of it after that line.

I hate these underhanded rhetorical 'maneuvers'--unfortunately, when the spin leads to a statement that makes the 'right team' look good, too many people happily swallow the result, no matter how disingenuous it might be.

It shouldn't be only the 'other team' that pushes back against bullshit like this.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I hate Trump and what he is doing but my very first thought was "this is a bullshit headline."

Statistically speaking, only a tiny fraction of people living in America have ever committed murder. Even if we believed that every murder was committed by a distinct individual and no murderer ever committed a second murder, the 6/100,000 annual homicide rate means that 0.006 percent of americans commit murder every year. If 1% of the people being deported are convicted murderers, that means a deportee is 167 times more likely to be a murderer than the average person - in other words, murderers are much more likely to be deported than non-murders, but they are not the only ones being targeted. The headline could have been much less (deliberately) misleading if they just wrote "Despite Vows to ONLY remove worst offenders, ICE deported many whose worst crimes were traffic offences." This would have been true and still bad.

Using the same assumptions as above, ICE could only deport 660 people each year (.006% * 11M undocumented immigrants) if they were truly committed to only deporting the "worst of the worst". Since ICE's daily quota is 3000, this is obviously a problem.

People watch way too much Dexter and believe that murder is much more common than it is.

[–] avattar@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If you deport everybody, surely that includes the worst of the worst? - someone in administration, probably (I was going to say Trump, but somehow that seems too complex a thought)

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

someone in administration, probably

You can just say Stephen Miller. We all know who you meant.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 4 points 3 days ago

Pretty much a "Kill them, for the Lord knows those that are His" situation

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Steven Miller

If you deport everybody, surely that includes the worst of the worst

Not when the worst of the worst are all part of the administration itself or its financial and political backers.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Your data is irrelevant. It's all about the fee-fees. Trump just knows they're up to no good.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

The ones doing the deporting, however... 😶

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah no shit

[–] gurnu@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Of course fascists will go for the easiest prey, they're pussies after all. But so are all US Americans for letting it happen