Israel calls Hamas' claim it rejected hostage release 'propaganda' (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by snek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why does Hamas need Israel's agreement to release hostages? Can't they release them to the Egyptian border guards at Rafah border crossing in the South?

Even if they can't release them to Egypt, they could put them at the border, and tell the news agencies hey these are hostages being released, and put a live video feed on them standing at the border. I promise you Egypt would not leave them standing there indefinitely. The media coverage alone would get them to at least take the hostages over the border.

Hell, they could take them to a UN compound and release them into the custody of the UN.

[-] burchalka@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Because that way they won't be able to extort goods and services for the hostages .. so sad seeing good hostage wasted...

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 1 year ago

In this press release Hamas said they tried to release more prisoners but Israeli wouldn't accept them.

If Hamas is being genuine, there shouldn't be any tit for tat on a humanitarian hostage release.

I'm just trying to demonstrate how The Hamas statement feels demonstrably disingenuous. Because they have other options.

Hamas is not a good actor, the plight of the people in the Gaza strip does not helped by Hamas being such a bad actor.

load more comments (14 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] rodolfo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

you make everything look simple. I'm slightly fascinated. then I get back into reality and I remember there's a cruel, blind war, and huge interests and plans going far over the borders of Isreal and Gaza.

the spiraling hate between parts? ah! silly them! "why they don't just..."

load more comments (30 replies)

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest 5 points 1 year ago

Why does Hamas need Israel’s agreement to release hostages?

Israel is bombing the Rafah border crossing.

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Remember, the first casualty of war is the truth.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah - I find this especially fucked up, when I watched that Interview with that Hamas Leader that straight out denied that any Israelian civilians were attacked, he said that the attackers were instructed not to attack civilians - while on the other Hand there were First Person Videos that live-streamed the massacre into the world.

I guess Hamas got a lot of bad PR from killing those civilians, in their own „peer groups“.

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest 1 points 1 year ago

while on the other Hand there were First Person Videos that live-streamed the massacre into the world.

I believe there were videos but have you seen any? Have they been verified by 3rd parties? if so can you link them?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 12 points 1 year ago

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/21/hamas-says-israel-refused-to-receive-2-hostages-israel-calls-it-propaganda

Here's the Al Jazeera article covering basically the same thing, they even quote a politician saying Hamas could just release the prisoners to the Red Cross or the UN, if they didn't want anything in return.

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

JERUSALEM, Oct 21 (Reuters) - Israel on Saturday described as "propaganda" a claim by Hamas that the militant group had wanted to release two more hostages on humanitarian grounds but that Israel declined to receive them.

Abu Ubaida, spokesman for Hamas' armed wing, said it informed Qatar of the group's intention to release the two additional people on Friday, the same day it freed Americans Judith Tai Ranaan and her daughter Natalie.

In a later statement, Abu Ubaida said Hamas was ready to free the two people on Sunday "using the same procedures" involved in the release of Judith and Natalie.

The Palestinian group captured around 210 people during its deadly assault in southern Israel on Oct. 7.

In a brief statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said: "We will not refer to false propaganda by Hamas."

The statement added: "We will continue to act in every way to return all the kidnapped and missing people home."

The original article contains 168 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 6%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023

97 points (88.2% liked)

World News

39004 readers

421 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.