this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

71966 readers
3280 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The decision ultimately means that laws can restrict the free speech of adults in service of protecting children.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But there's no such legislation or required identification for my kids to see graphic violence and gore. We're a pretty bass ackwards society.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Are there graphic gore and violence websites that kids are frequenting by the millions daily?

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Movies, books, and video games all have a decently sizeable amount, yea. Especially the Bible.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 29 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Free speech only applies to saying the N word

-Supreme Court probably some time in the future

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Ah, the ol in haec verba Tarantino rule

[–] basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Am I the only one who beleives that it would have been a more effective arguement to try and use the 4th amendment instead of the 1st? Violating free speech is just a weak claim, but "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches..." seems quite relevent here. But I am also not a lawyer.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I thought they just stuck down the one in Tennessee? What the fuck. Sick of these corrupt courts.