this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
1464 points (98.5% liked)

solarpunk memes

4147 readers
641 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 105 points 1 week ago (11 children)
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Like, what are the other options? Homes seem mandatory for societal and economic interaction.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago (34 children)

I'm enough of a socdem that the hexbear types ban me at first sight when I comment in their communities, but I'm still of the opinion that everyone is entitled to have A home. Something that is reasonably sized given the location, and there may be compromises in location itself (not everyone is going to fit in Manhattan after all). So an apartment in NYC or a single family home in flyover states somewhere. This is just using the US as an example because it's so culturally dominant, I think everyone knows what NYC is like. Everyone should be able to live in a home that affords them basic human dignity.

Now rich people can still have their mansions or whatever, but they'll have to pay for the privilege. The rest of us, if content with the aforementioned social housing, wouldn't have to pay. There would still be premium developments. Premium apartments or houses to rent or buy. But there would be no more profiting off the working class's basic need for shelter.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But there must be ads on every inch of the house until you purchase premium. Cmon, you can't just exist without suffering. What would be the point of life, if not torture?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I find it interesting how in every single video game that involves fostering a population, it's up to you to make sure everyone is housed. Too logical and efficient for billionaires, I guess.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago (17 children)

What I love about those video games is that they teach us very clearly that a command economy leads to prosperity (unless you suck as a player I guess), but then billionaires tell us no, free market capitalism and trickle-down are the way we have to go.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Trickle-down" was a rebranding campaign.

It used to be called Horse and Sparrow Economics, with the idea being the Horses eat the grain, and Sparrows peck their meals from the horseshit.

The wealth layer has been playing this game against the poors for a long time.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Funny, because it taught me that that task in reality is impossible, given real nations can't load an old save file to fix their fuck ups in a simulation far, far simpler than reality.

Of course you could certainly argue that one person wouldn't be in charge of doing literally everything.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Might be wrong, but I think in Cities Skylines all you're doing is zoning the city, and it's up to the people to build houses and live (or have their house burn down)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 51 points 1 week ago (50 children)

The idea of ownership is kinda silly.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 72 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Right? "My ancestors beat up your ancestors, so I deserve to live in wealth and opulence, while you deserve to be my slave"

It really is pretty fucked up.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's that poem(?) about that

"""

"Get off this estate."

"What for?"

"Because it's mine."

"Where did you get it?"

"From my father."

"Where did he get it?"

"From his father."

"And where did he get it?"

"He fought for it."

"Well, I'll fight you for it."

"""

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9358361-get-off-this-estate-what-for-because-it-s-mine-where

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The Dude would just say fuck it and not even bother arguing and tell Brandt that the Big Lebowski told him to take any one of his rental properties as The Dude's own.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (33 children)

Ultimately it comes down to might makes right. That’s the final argument of kings (the barrel of a gun). For all the progress we’ve made we still can’t escape the account of Thrasymachus.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hell I'd take the right to build my own at this point. But I don't trust the U.S. to be worth living in for any foreseeable future.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I mean we're staring down the barrel of total civilization collapse by 2050 if we don't get climate change under control, so I mean, I'm not sure anywhere is gonna be all that good.

However, your point stands.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›