Lobsters and hackernews.

Lemmy and piefed can be deviated into being used as a single sub instance as an alternative but it's just not the same.

Other than this, we are pretty fine with the basics, it would be nice to have more people working towards letting mods be mods with proper tools without involving CLI.

Also some combo like local first acting as a PDS being able to be written by different softwares. (Basically atproto or solid yes)(yes silverpill and holos are working on this but 2 different people working on 2 different implementation of the hardest thing in the fedi doesn't seem optimal for a network made of devs lol)

Protocolli diversi.

Atproto spacchetta un server mastodon in praticamente più parti:

• identità
• dati
• aggregazione
• feed
• moderazione

Questo permette di avere una singola identità con una singola fonte dei propri dati ma usando diversi servizi senza preoccuparsi che vadano down.

Eurosky sta iniziando a tirare sù diversi servizi che copiano l'infrastruttura di Bluesky ma ad essere onesti non ce ne sarebbe bisogno. Se anche morissero grandi parti della rete finché ci sono i PDS e chi risolve l'identità il resto sticazzi

Problema di atproto rispetto a activitypub: per ora è tutto pubblico

Ma stanno lavorando diverse persone a permissioned Spaces etc

Oh wait, apparently not on Lemmyml but yes on slrpnk

@poVoq@slrpnk.net is it something about us? Lol

Ellipsis get rendered as flying points...

Originally, solarpunk was to talk only about solarpunk itself

Basically solarpunk theory

Why do you think this is a solarpunk approach to governance? Are there examples that work like that? What could go wrong? And so on to give it more depth and not just be a "news" link

Only half agree here. I get the low effort posting issue but it's not like I expect every solarpunk to explain every win every post. It's like saying "add why do you think it's solarpunk if someone stops Israel". Anticapitalism is one of the basic values of solarpunk as much as not liking genocide, racism and so on.

It's also true that it's much easier to spot a genocide rather than the practicalities of capitalism...

wow, that is ugly

Cannot seem to find it that spokesperson is still working for them tho

I don't have LinkedIn access so if someone can...

We kinda agree I think. But we see differently what I posted probably. It's true that it's not about the tech itself but the development of tech; at the same time, licenses and engineering won't build solarpunk alone...

I would ban news from almost the whole server to be honest, I just don't see this as one but more like a communication from me to other solarpunks to say "yo people we've got another tech foundation we can use to not give money to capitalism"

In the latest rework of lemmini before the shutdown I just reimagined the main community as a solarpunk hackernews to ease this

It's a lot more than domains and it's still a tech company turning more anticapitalist

Selfhosting should be more for mutual help

But again, you know I intended slrpnk kinda differently so maybe I'm wrong compared to present times lol

Everyone is welcome to discuss things on !piefed_dev@piefed.social , the Zulip or Matrix groups.

yes, but we would go back to having more sources of truth that are heavier on the devs, even because of the repetitions and scattering of the same topics

why do you take single part of my message and answer to them like they are not part of the whole message blaze :(

first i said that single source of truth etc and then i pointed out that the single source has not to be dev oriented, don't answer to my second point with the issue of the first point

Deactivitating issues there would hide visibility on the work being done and planned

that is not true, there are a lot of kanbans and ticketing software that can be used; to be fair, i should have said deactivating the possibility to open and comment except by mantainers

and in the system i proposed, you could still join and comment issues and features on piefed anyway (if you are not one of the piefed people)

no one said to not use codeberg, i just said to deactivate issues there

unifying the place where people talk and report

some people prioritize the git forge for this and leave out the rest, but this basically says ''we don't want you'' to all non developers

I'm not sure if you are referring to some particular situations but I totally get the feeling

Maybe it's time to rework the issues pipeline.

No more chats, no more zulip, no more GitHub issues

A piefed community for feature requests and one for issues, with a bot chained to linear or similar and mods to help you without being devs or learning git etc

Single source of truth, on your own platform :o

P.S. and deep focus timeblocks or communication timeblocks