this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

563 readers
162 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It would be much more comfortable for him rather than just becoming an actual communist.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 47 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Yes because "the real movement that abolishes the present state of things" is VERY clear.

[–] Pili@hexbear.net 34 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The present state of things is me scrolling hexbear in my bed, I will abolish it by falling asleep. Behold, communism.

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 22 points 4 weeks ago

Building Communism a little bit more every time I hit the vape pen

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago

Present state of things: a fart inside my butt

Abolishing the present state of things: doing a big fart

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 weeks ago

It makes more sense when the full quote is used:

Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 8 points 4 weeks ago

Sorry tankies, this proves that even marx would have thought Hitler was a communist. He changed the state of Germany.

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago

You're upset because socialist literature is not a play by play and they all advise that it's going to depend on material conditions and the rest of the superstructure?

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Communism is the doctrine of the liberation of the proletariat

I mean it has a weird flow but the meaning is pretty clear to me idk I guess I'm just built different

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 7 points 4 weeks ago

Usually im not gonna be the correcting spelling and grammar in a post as an own, but if youre gonna nitpick theory in public know your 'too' from a 'to' and don't capitalize names sometimes and be just as free form when adding an apostrophe to make it the possessive form and not plural. Also the 2 quotes that are apparently preferred are just as vague. Especially the Marx one, that could be any social change at all.