this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
141 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8134 readers
148 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Yes, they’re hypocrites, it’s nothing new

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

inhibit the execution of the laws

Can anyone weigh in on whether this was phrased oddly for legal reasons or whether trump’s team is as inept as he is?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

"ChatGPT, here's an executive order, make it sound legalish"

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

IANAL, but I'm guessing it's to bring a sense of legitimacy to an otherwise batshit insane order. I feel like the Fed knows what they're doing is illegal, but phrasing it this way makes it seem sane to their base (who too are batshit insane).

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

January 6th was a TOURIST VISIT that we Need to FORGET happened because ANTIFA and BLM made it VIOLENT and ONLY MAGAS got Arrested!

I also CANT READ so this Executive Order means NOTHING to me! I LOVE Trump and I LOVE Freedom!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That’s why Miller made a point to call it an insurrection multiple times.

Miller

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Gotta love how this is written in first person from trumps perspective as if he is literate and understand anything at all.