this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
142 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8246 readers
646 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, they’re hypocrites, it’s nothing new

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

inhibit the execution of the laws

Can anyone weigh in on whether this was phrased oddly for legal reasons or whether trump’s team is as inept as he is?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

"ChatGPT, here's an executive order, make it sound legalish"

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

IANAL, but I'm guessing it's to bring a sense of legitimacy to an otherwise batshit insane order. I feel like the Fed knows what they're doing is illegal, but phrasing it this way makes it seem sane to their base (who too are batshit insane).

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 weeks ago

January 6th was a TOURIST VISIT that we Need to FORGET happened because ANTIFA and BLM made it VIOLENT and ONLY MAGAS got Arrested!

I also CANT READ so this Executive Order means NOTHING to me! I LOVE Trump and I LOVE Freedom!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

That’s why Miller made a point to call it an insurrection multiple times.

Miller

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Gotta love how this is written in first person from trumps perspective as if he is literate and understand anything at all.