Where are they? : lgbtq

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 42 points 10 months ago

I honestly don't have any pride for being straight, and I have no idea why I should.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 42 points 10 months ago

I've literally heard someone say "You'll be discriminated against for being straight in the US!"

Nah, bruh. It's not your straightness that's the issue— it's your stupid-ass views & shit-fuck opinions.

[–] Contentedness@lemmy.nz 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I mean with domestic violence rates as they are you could argue it's dangerous to be a straight woman pretty much everywhere.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

In that case they should become feminists.

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 10 months ago

Tbf all cemeteries are for living people. The dead don't care.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Transylvania

[–] Laser@feddit.org 9 points 10 months ago

As a straight cis man, the idea of straight pride is pathetic. It's so easy, nobody ever questions you for it. There is no work in living your sexuality. Such a sad idea. Has those "all lives matter" vibes

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Lesbos

/s

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Being straight is pretty dangerous on the sun, but considering it a country would require stretching the definition

[–] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Philippe I, Duke of Orléans's "homosexual activity was not unwelcome, because it was seen to reduce any potential threat he may have posed to his older brother."

That is a rare instance where being straight was more dangerous.

Straight pride is stupid.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 4 points 10 months ago

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you are brown…the US.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago

That's a country where being brown is dangerous, not being straight.

Though being the straight partner to a brown person can be dangerous here (even if you yourself are not brown), so I guess it does work in a way.

[+] Gullible@sh.itjust.works -10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

They also fucked kids and had slaves, so I wouldn't look to the Greeks and Romans for your standards.

Not saying that gay is bad, just that your reference is.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

It was only dangerous for slaves

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a link about this? Not arguing, we are genuinely curious.

[+] wampus@lemmy.ca -13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] gid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 10 months ago

Do you know you're being disingenuous?

Straight people aren't being murdered for being straight.

None of your points are examples of how it's dangerous to be straight.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From what I observed the people who consider the concept of consent flawed and are discussing how it could be improved upon, so the safety and comfort of all people involved is protected seems, are the same people who fights for women's right. There is a great RadioLab dive in on the topic - I honestly couldn't recommend it enough). People who demands straight pride parades uses any edge cases of consent going wrong to weaponize it into "it happened, so the consent was there". If you're genuinely concern about safety and well-being of man, you're putting your effort in a wrong place.

[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can you share a direct link to that RadioLab piece please?

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 4 points 10 months ago

of course. it was a multipar series called "in the NO" or simply "No". Here is the first part: https://radiolab.org/podcast/no-part-1

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

No.

The answer to your first question is: "No. Not at all. That is independent of sexual orientation."

And "openly expressing an urge to fuck" at work vs "get in your gimp suit and party on a float" at a public event.... If you can't sus out the difference between those two situations, no wonder you are afraid of getting in trouble...

What a dumb argument.

LGBTQ+