this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38773 readers
228 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Well, clearly this is gonna be something that every republican will oppose, right? Riiiight? The government tracking citizens with a database?? My conspiracy theory neighbor bitches about this all the time. He's gonna oppose this, right?????

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

It will be used to track who owns a gun!

Maybe not, but the fact that it could, should get them to oppose it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

2006'es Alex Jones would have gone mental over this.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 days ago

Something something accusing their opposition of doing the thing that they either are currently doing, or 100% would be doing if they had the opportunity.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 days ago

Hypocrisy is considered a strength. So they're definitely not against it.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Already not a fan of Palantir, this is pretty bad news

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 3 days ago

I think nobody is a fan of Palantir. In a truly democratic society people would never allow such a company to collect all your data.

Well the half-good news is, judging by Palantir's track record of managing large public projects elsewhere, that project is bound to bankrupt the US once and for all so people can build something new. The bad news is, it's probably only going to happen late within the first fifteen years of the 'two-year' contract.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] remington@beehaw.org 16 points 3 days ago

Here's an archive link of that NY Times article: https://archive.is/tXBRJ

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Afaik this is basically what the NSA's Prism is.

The sprawling bureaucracy needed to analyze and maintain such a database will be so costly in comparison to its actual value that it's already amusing to think about.

[–] GaetanLaberge@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago
[–] Rustic_Fry@literature.cafe 5 points 3 days ago

Databases aren't fireproof. This seems like a good reason to kick things off.