this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
602 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

70088 readers
2892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 69 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Don't take this the wrong way, but fuck your business model. The internet was supposed to be open and be ours, and you stole it for profit.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To be honest: you can still make your own website, and in many ways big companies are actually making it easier through open-source projects and stuff like Let's Encrypt. The web industry is remarkably open compared to what big companies do in other industries. A lot of the standards meetings and stuff you can just go to and give your opinion. Or ignore the standards and fork it yourself. This alarmism I fear will make people not take the actually alarming things like encryption bans or ID requirements seriously.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Only for some things, though. If you host your own e-mail these days, chances are, you're going to have a very difficult time sending them anywhere without risking them being deleted, or automatically thrown into spam folders.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

True, but sadly that's because of what became a genuine user safety concern

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

also independent of that, fuck cloudflare

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

And fuck the region-blocking that often comes with cloudflare.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 52 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Letting Google break the law for years with illegal anti-competitive practices is now hurting everyone else's ability to earn money.

I wonder if we have the combined will to do anything about it, or if we will wait and hope the invisible hand of the market will fix it....

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

if we will wait and hope the invisible hand of the market will fix it....

Have we lost faith in our handsome businessman? /s

[–] nsrxn@scribe.disroot.org 32 points 4 days ago (6 children)

nobody is going to want to create new content when they get paid nothing or almost nothing for doing so.

that's a lie

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

so basically back to internet 1.0, sounds good actually.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

Old youtube was a pretty cool place and nobody got paid

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 224 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Web was much better and more useful back before it had a business model. Good riddance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 109 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Yeah well maybe the web shouldn't be a business

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago (16 children)

god what I wouldnt give to go back to the days of the mid 90s, when the internet was nothing more than a collection of tech weirdos, with websites being nothing more than passion projects with no advertising, no SEO, no search engines, etc etc.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 37 points 5 days ago

America: "No money = no purpose"

the o'l capitalist shalamalama ding-dong...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 129 points 5 days ago (3 children)

For a glorious second, the entire world was able to communicate as one.

Then we catalogued every accessible reservoir of culture and knowledge, mined them bare, and refilled them with slop.

A global collective consciousness, hollowed out, replaced with static. No signal. Only noise.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I really non ironically miss the friction of the old internet.

I prefer how it took time to find some bare HTML university website, slowly browse through an index as if it was a book, and then find one non-SEO optimized page with all the information you needed on a topic for your research.

The time to browse, being exposed to other terms, having to select the pages yourself, being skeptical by nature, and then having to copy it by hand... This is a much more positive scenario than having a gigantic company learn everything about you and everybody else and then make these decisions for you, using some hidden algorithm, and with the ultimate goal of pushing their newest process. And of course, the content has been rendered virtually useless to appeal to that algorithm.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

when the internet was a wild and unexplored frontier, and we were adventurers charting the unknown.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'll drink to that memory, my brother

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 161 points 5 days ago (4 children)

So you’re saying the ad driven internet will die? And we will be left with what? Wikipedia and Lemmy? I for one welcome our AI overlords!

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 51 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (12 children)

Nah, it’s saying that ad and AI-driven internet will prevail. People only use Google to find an answer and don’t dig deeper, and if they do, it’s often because the links are sponsored. People using GPT’s are even less likely to click a link. Currently no ads, but just wait.

Apologies if you were joking.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (4 children)

"what should I do if I'm going through severe emotional distress? How to choose a good psychiatrist?"

ChatGPT: "I'm sorry to hear that you've been going to a stressful situation, it's always worth talking about your feelings. I've come up with a plan to help you:

1 Purchase an ice cold Pepsi Black™ from a Pepsi official supplier"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] jonathan7luke@lemmy.ml 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

This is part of the larger problem that AI tools are trained on (and profit off of) content that is produced and hosted by others who are now seeing their traffic change from humans to bots. For content sources that pay for hosting with ads, this means a loss in revenue to pay for hosting. For content sources like Wikipedia, they are seeing their hosting costs increase significantly due to the increase in bot traffic. Even if you want every website that depends on ad revenue to fail (which I don't entirety agree with), AI is still damaging the open web in other ways. Websites like Wikipedia for example may soon be forced to lock content behind logins or leverage aggressive captchas just to fight the bot traffic, which makes things worse for those of us that still prefer to use actual websites over AI summaries.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is all extrapolated from google's self published survey of how their users interact with their search results. Approximately 60% of users don't click anything after a search. Personally I think that is because users have found their results to be seo garbage and not worth clicking on... but that's just my opinion.

[–] CubeOfCheese@sopuli.xyz 40 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've watched a lot of students do a search after I tell them to research something, look through a few of the summaries, then look at me in defeat. I have to tell them to actually click some links to try and find an answer

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I went to college for networking but the most productive class I've ever had where I learned the most about the internet was instead back in high school. This teacher would make 20 page packets with the most obscure questions like what's the weight of model number 62xRG4 (some obscure car part or something) and he told us to google it. We would spend entire classes just searching for information we would never use, but it drilled into me how to go about finding the information I need. It's been utterly invaluable. Thank you Mr Ward.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Of course they don't click anything. Google search has just become a front-end for Gemini, the answer is "served" up right at the top and most people will just take that for Gospel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 41 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Good. Maybe we can go back to paying for our services instead of getting tracked everywhere we go.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 53 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That’s not what will happen. We will have to pay AND be tracked. They are not going to give anything up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

When Orwell predicted universal surveillance he never anticipated that the people themselves would install the cameras, let alone pay a subscription.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

maybe their business model. trust me. they'll find a way to monetize the zero click internet too. then it's back to square one

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I believe this is why tech execs and investors are so hot on pushing AI into everything. They’ll control everyone’s digital experience and you can 100% count on being force fed ads and paid propaganda. Embrace, extend, extinguish

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, so much for all those promises of disintermediation being a benefit of the web.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Are they still defending the fact they host Stormfront?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The web doesn't have a business model, cloudflair, you do. And nobody cares because you suck.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 79 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Eh, Cloudflare provides a pretty good service for a very reasonable price.

But yeah, the web doesn't have a business model in the same way a town square doesn't, yet you can make a business work in both areas. Make a compelling product and people will pay you for it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 7rokhym@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

Everyone is too busy doomscrolling TikTok to notice.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cloudflare already ruined the web way before AI was even a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Can someone check in with the inventor of the web and ask him what the web's business model is?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 25 points 5 days ago

When Google itself is the one stopping you from clicking on a website you've got a problem.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

It needs to get even nastier so that it affects all the big players in a huge way so they get to do something about it. While it only affects the indie web we are all just gonna keep suffering.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I didn’t come here for heartwarming stories; yet here I am.

load more comments
view more: next ›