this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22617 readers
375 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As we reported on Monday, a bill called the GENIUS Act would set up a relatively weak regulatory framework for stablecoins, digital assets pegged to the U.S. dollar and used mostly to facilitate crypto trading. It was almost destined for success, as a significant number of crypto-friendly Democrats, boosted by campaign contributions from the industry, were all set to sign on. But then reports about Trump’s family organization launching a stablecoin, and the United Arab Emirates using it in a $2 billion deal to purchase the digital currency exchange Binance started bubbling up. Suddenly, it seemed like terrible politics for Democrats to effectively rubber-stamp Trump’s crypto corruption.

Late on Wednesday, Democrats took a deal that will give them a standalone vote on the End Crypto Corruption Act, as an amendment to the GENIUS Act. When that fails—and it will fail, because Republicans in the majority are not going to vote to force a divestiture of their president’s crypto empire—they will proceed to a vote on the GENIUS Act.

This gives Democrats on the fence the ability to say that they tried everything they could to stop Trump corruption. But it’s completely untrue. Sen. Merkley, who I’m sure is sincere in his effort and who wasn’t part of this deal, released a statement on Wednesday saying, “This is the right moment to have anti-corruption provisions included in the GENIUS Act.” He’s right: If Democrats were serious about ending crypto corruption, they could have made those provisions a condition of their votes on the GENIUS Act. Instead they got a worthless amendment and gave away their leverage.

“Schumer 101,” said one source with knowledge of the process.

thurston

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

“Schumer 101,” said one source with knowledge of the process.

Caves compared.

[–] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

"Quick, Alexandria, to the Democrats cave!"

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 2 points 2 hours ago

We should just sticky a thread that says "Democrats cave" and then update it as needed.

[–] RomCom1989@hexbear.net 0 points 1 hour ago

Democrats cave

barbara-pit

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 10 points 11 hours ago

Democrats cave is redundant.

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 7 points 11 hours ago

love the legislation name. that whole genre of the name being completely contrary to what it is.

it used to make me mad, but now I'm like

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 13 points 13 hours ago

"Democrats cave" is most political headlines throughout modern US history

[–] miz@hexbear.net 6 points 12 hours ago