this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
759 points (95.8% liked)

World News

46429 readers
2183 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rasakaf679@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You miss spelled it... Its not quiet quitting... Its doing what's necessary and nothing excess.. if you aren't paid for it

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Workers are doing their jobs! Gasp!

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Considering that work ethic literally kills people: Good.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"kills" ... This is still occurring, let's use the present tense.

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

I don't know if this was the intention, but that came off a bit condescending in my opinion. I completely agree with you, present tense would have been more apt (I'm going to edit it to fix it), but I resent the way your correction was presented. If that was not your intention, I apologize. I'm tired this morning.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, fuck all those guys for doing their job to a sufficient quality and quantity to not get fired, eh?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I fucking hate the 'quiet quitting' term. It puts the onus on the people who are tired of the inhumane hours and treatment, and the accompanying meager pay. Instead of putting it on the companies and government whose policies and ethics are fostering these awful conditions which engender these sorts of worker responses. It's not quiet quitting. It's holding boundaries between work and personal life. It's not allowing the company to steal your time away from you. It's preventing the company from overstepping their position in your life. It's so many things that are important and 'quiet quitting' does those people a disservice in favor of a catchy corporate approved soundbite. I find that disgusting.

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I did not find any proper meaning of phrase quiet quitting

It might as well mean - working only the amount you are paid for - which sounds totally reasonable.

Totally corporate worded article.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a phrase meant to replace the old phrase "working your wage", because that way of viewing it makes the whole situation less dramatic and more noble … and generates less clicks. Classic newsspeak.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I always took it to mean "doing the least amount of work possible without getting fired." If someone's making an effort to work the amount they're paid for, I wouldn't consider it quiet quitting.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

You can define it that way, but the problem is that the authors of the article didn't give a definition. For example, I think they think the term means to do what's in your job description and contract. And they think that workers should be going above and beyond that. But if they were forced to spell it out, then people would ask why companies don't change the job description or contract, because obviously it's ridiculous to ask people to do what you didn't ask them to do.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

We used to just call it Work to Rule.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 190 points 3 days ago (18 children)

Fuck the term quiet quitting. Call it what it is, doing your job.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago

Employee burnout is a symptom of a toxic work culture, and "quiet quitting" is a corporate psyop invented to prevent you from noticing it.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Heh, I've seen this personally. I work for a Japanese company, and part of my job is coordinating tooling installations with the factory I'm stationed at (pick a chip fab in the US, I've probably been there). When we get a tool onsite, I get an install team directly from our factory in Japan who handles all the physical installation aspects. They work hard, efficiently, and with the utmost care for the finer details (some of these tools are expected to last 20+ years - we have a few that have been in production for nearly as long with very little fuss). Occasionally, they will finish their tasks early the last couple days and take off after lunch, letting me know of this beforehand and that their daily reports will be sent to me and other relevant managers at the "usual" time, with a wink and a nod.

I don't care how much time they clock, as long as shit gets done properly. Haven't had any issues.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] tamman2000@lemm.ee 54 points 3 days ago

This is what happens in societies that have increasing income inequality.

Why should workers feel compelled to bust their asses when it benefits their bosses, but not themselves?

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 days ago

we should normalize to punch everyone in the gut who uses the words "quiet quitting".

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 217 points 3 days ago (8 children)

From what I’ve read, Japan’s work ethic has been more about presenteeism than productivity for a while. While long hours are the norm, it’s more important to be seen to be working than to be productive, so you don’t leave before the boss does, but you do spend a large amount of that time staring out the window or otherwise idling.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 64 points 3 days ago (11 children)

I worked at a place where basically every other department would stand in the lobby at 4:58 PM, waiting for accounting (which was on the other side of the building) to leave. If you didn't wait, the CEO would likely see you from his office window and you'd be getting a "talking to" by your supervisor the next day. I have never before or since worked anywhere where I've seen so much collective time wasting, trying to keep up the appearance of being busy.

This was an American company. I don't miss that shit hole in the slightest.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 35 points 2 days ago

The Japanese work ethic doesn't even make sense and does more harm than good. If you don't have time for yourself or family the society will collapse (already happening). To be clear, I'm not talking about being diligent work, but working 8+ hours every single day.

Many Japanese don't leave work at 5pm even though those are the official business hours because it's rude to leave before the boss leaves. So people stay at work until 7 or 8pm. Many times having to also go drinking with co-workers or the boss. So, depending on the day, you may end up with 1-2 hours for yourself. No wonder they aren't having children, and depression rates are sky high.

Same applies to Korea.

[–] xep@fedia.io 132 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The phrase "quiet quitting" really grinds my gears. Are you fulfilling the terms of your employment contract? Yes? Then you're working, and haven't quit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 101 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Japan has strong worker protections. It is very difficult to fire an employee in Japan, without showing that the employee committed a crime. Employees can do practically nothing at work and still get paid. Call in sick as much as they want and the only penalty is not getting paid sick days once they run out of paid sick leave and vacation days. If an employer does mass layoffs, they have to show that the company is on the verge of bankruptcy and they have tried everything else, including reducing the pay of executives or removing executive positions before firing employees. Elon Musk is in hot water in Japan for mass firing Twitter employees in Japan. He violated Japanese labor laws.

Yea instead of firing you they'll try their hardest to get you to quit. They'll send you to the 追い出し部屋.

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So when the CEO of Nintendo cut his salary due to the poor sales of the Wii U and every American tech writer praised him for it, that was just common practice in Japan?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

FYI the "Japanese crazy long hours and hard work ethic" BS only applies to corporate jobs.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-work-week-by-country

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 131 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From the original reporting in the Japan Times:

Some 45% of full-time employees in Japan are “quiet quitters” — workers doing the bare minimum to meet their job requirements

Oh, no! People are doing their jobs! What a disaster!

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 53 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I much prefer the term "acting your wage". I'm not doing the bare minimum - I'm doing what I'm paid for. You want me to do more? Guess what, there's one way to motivate me to do so...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was probably higher before, but it wasn't as acceptable to say it as it is today.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You're basically right. Back when unions were a thing, they dubbed this behavior "working your wage" I.e. not volunteering for unpaid labor. "Quiet quitting" is a neologism designed by a think tank to shift the burden of responsibility to the employee

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Yea, every article using the term quiet quitting is getting a down vote. Doing what you're paid for is simply doing your job. This is basically akin to getting mad you didn't get a tip. A TIP IS OPTIONAL.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Thank goodness. Now when im napping during work I can feel less guilty thinking about Japan doing it too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good job working class Japan 👏 full support burn the tyranny of the rich down. Starting a Global workering class revolt 👊

load more comments
view more: next ›