this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
649 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23243 readers
3107 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A majority of Americans say President Trump is a "dangerous dictator" who poses a threat to democracy and believe he's overstepped his authority by actions such as the mass firing of federal employees, a new survey says.

The wide-ranging poll released Tuesday, on Trump's 100th day in office, is the latest sign of him losing support for his immigration and economic policies — the two issues that largely fueled his election.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Where was this fucking majority in November!?!

Useless cunts.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

They were protest voting because Harris wasn't good enough, so now they hold their heads high that they didn't vote for the person who wasn't strong enough against genocide while the genocide accelerationist tries to speedrun the bad end.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They're coming for you! These concentration camps are for you!

80 Billion all itemized for your oppression and death.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

And fuck Biden for not dismantling the existing apparatus for it while he had the chance.

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Ok, so why didn't the majority vote against him then??

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 14 hours ago

He's also racist. It's a slippery slope.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Because genocide or some shit

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

who could possibly have seen this coming, except everyone. He literally is doing all the things he said he was gonna do. Surprised much?

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

And his cultists repeatedly say they're overjoyed with how horrible he's being. This country is absolutely cooked.

[–] Papaslair@lemmy.ca 26 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

He has torn apart in 100 days a country that took almost 250 years to build.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

All this talk of the Roman Empire and all has been because they intend to hand over all authority to Trump. Just like the Roman Senate did for Caesar.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Clearly the system has major flaws that got us here, such as not enabling the judicial branch to enforce laws, first past the post voting leading to a two party system, non-mathematical districting enabling gerrymandering, etc.

The biggest one though, is forming the country around capitalism, which enables people who seek power to obtain it via exploiting people for profit. The now-powerful then use their power to buy the government so that they could be allowed to exploit people further for more short term financial gain.

If the workers owned the businesses they worked for and if we had a hard wealth cap of $50m by taxing everything over that at 100%, no single person would be able to obtain that kind of power/influence to begin with.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago

It's quite the achievement of malice and desperation.
I hate the orange shitgibbon. I absolutely detest that moving sack of human effluence, but you've got to give him credit where it's due. 250 years of diplomacy down the shitter in less than 100 days.

I can only hope that history will treat him the way he deserves to be treated and that his sycophants get the same.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Start running polls asking if they think the military should forcefully remove him. Get everyone on board and used to the idea

[–] CitizenBrain@lemm.ee 4 points 23 hours ago

If they don't, someone else will

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 108 points 1 day ago (5 children)

FTA:

For example, most Americans (61%) disagree that the federal government should place immigrants who are in the country illegally in internment camps guarded by the U.S. military until they can be deported.

Only 61%? Have I lost my fucking mind? This feels unbelievable to read.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 3 hours ago

61% disagree, 19% agree, 20% are worried that if they answer wrong they'll be next

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think the biggest thing I learned this last election is just how much of the country are HUGE pieces of shit. I thought there were maybe 15-20% that were on board with this Nazi shit. It's well over double that.

We fucked up during Reconstruction, and we fucked up again after WWII. Every single Confederate/Nazi should've been disposed of and never allowed to have any influence whatsoever. Instead the cancer has metastasized to every single organ in the body.

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago

Sherman had the right idea.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think your original estimate is correct, but the problem is that they've captured enough media outlets that sow doubt about right-wingers' true natures to make another 20-30% just uncertain enough to vote for the nazis.

Agree with your remediation, though. Confederates, Nazis, and J6ers are enemies of the state and should be forever barred from holding public office.

[–] socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a ton of the media really, not 'just enough' afaict. So much reporting from all the US mainstream media treats everything he says with kid gloves. If he invaded canada tomorrow the headline on CNN would be something like "US military deployed in proactive peacekeeping mission to the north".

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I mean "just enough" in terms of uncertainty, not in terms of the number of news organizations.

Though I also think that there's a matter of degrees here. Some news orgs are doing some heavy water-carrying, normalizing a lot of really non-normal stuff. Some are definitely trying to hedge their bets, being as deferential to the regime as they reasonably can in hopes that they can fly under the radar. And some of them are actually doing really good and unbiased reporting work, but not rising to the occasion of providing the necessary context required to show how much of a crisis this administration is.

And of course there are full-blown propaganda factories, and fully-independent news sources doing great reporting with great context. But both of those are pretty uncommon.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago

We have to learn our lesson and not repeat it no matter how many crocodile tears are pleas to Civility and mercy there are, even if they come from liberals. Not going far enough is a bigger risk than going too far

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Operation Paperclip would like to have a word.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Right? Like I thought everyone agreed the Japanese internment camps was a dark spot on our history.

Guess it's just because we like the Japanese now?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'm in Merced, CA, which was one of the initial collection points for detained Japanese Americans before they were put in the internment camps. We have a little memorial at the fair grounds, which is where they were collected up at. I've always believed that people 50, 100, 200, and 2000 years ago really aren't fundamentally different than people today, and anyone today who professes to be disgusted by Jim Crow but still embraces modern forms of oppression would have embraced Jim Crow back then. We're seeing that now. These folks, without even a second thought, will eagerly embrace Hispanic internment camps while denouncing the Japanese internment camps as something that never should have happened, and dismiss any semblance with a thought terminating "but this is different."

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

This is really well said. Throughout history, you can reliably find people on both sides of moral and humanitarian issues like this. There were Roman elite who spoke out against slavery in antiquity, there were Brits who mocked the American Colonies for owning slaves while founding a country based on freedom, there have always been men who believed in equal treatment and rights for women. Right and wrong is usually pretty clear, and in general regular people throughout the ages have been able to recognize which is which. Our values haven’t changed much, but our systems of power and accountability have.

That said, I also believe a good amount of the right wing backlash against the internment camps was performative. Because up until relatively recently, many racists themselves understood that their beliefs were terrible, so they at least tried to hide their true feelings and spoke out against obvious atrocities like this in public. But that was only so they could be accepted by the wider culture, and so they could continue to participate in left-coded spaces. They don’t need to hide how awful they are anymore because the president is leading by example.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (7 children)

For any election anywhere, approximately 35% are going to be batshit. 61% is super close to "everyone who isn't batshit" category. That's an amazing election number.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago

If that’s true, sounds like NOW is the time to ACT since we aren’t picking up anyone else. Right?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Consider that surveys also indicate that 30-40% of the US are essentially “Trump No Matter What” people. Maybe some variation depending on the issue.

So 60% isn’t too far off the mark for people not supporting everything trump does.

E: 48.3% of registered voters voted for Harris. Maybe if that extra ~12% of Americans that are unhappy about Trump had gotten off their asses and voted we might be complaining about a crappy Neo-Liberal instead of a straight up fascist takeover.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Day 100 of not letting it be forgotten that the republicans led a massive, distributed campaign of targeted vote rejection. They spent years getting true believers and laws and rules to support them put into place throughout states and counties, and it bore fruit. There was a disproportionately high number of ballot challenges this last election, and black folks got their ballots tossed a staggering 900% more often than white folks. There's likely a very large number of people who thought they voted in this last election and have no idea that their ballot got tossed. This is the real shit that that dumbfuck starlink conspiracy buried. I'm still in awe that the Kamalampaign just basically shrugged and went "okie dokie! Pack your bags, Katy Perry, party's over!" instead of doing the normal investigations, challenges, etc. Mind you, some of that IS normal, and double checking via the courts is a good thing to do; not like the Trump campaign and its like 300 bullshit ass claims, but more like ten or twelve claims with some actual weight.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 66 points 1 day ago

WHAT!?!?! The guy that said he would be a dictator on day one is a dictator on day one!?!?! Who could have seen this coming!?!?!

[–] DetectiveNo64@lemmy.ca 14 points 23 hours ago

You guys should start actually rebelling.

[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Take the MAGA cult out of the poll and it's more like high 60s to low 70s.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's the ostrich/head in the sand types who stay oblivious on purpose.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

There's also people that just assume it's more of the usual WEE-WOO-WEE-WOO FOX NEWS ALERT OBAMA WORE A TAN SUIT AND USED TO SMOKE, IS HE THE ANTI-CHRIST?! WEE-WOO-WEE-WOO MITT ROMNEY SAID HE HAS BINDERS FULL OF WOMEN* stuff and don't pay any mind. We're some of the most heavily propagandized people on earth, and some folks choose to save their sanity by just ignoring it. Trump's bullshit has actually been bad enough to burst the bubble for a few of these people.

*Binders full of women was legitimately just fucking funny. I actually laughed when I heard the debate live on the radio. For proof that Romney is a lizard person, you have to look at how he strapped the family dog to the roof of their car to go on vacation.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

They sure seem reluctant to do something about him though.

"This guy is a real threat, he's dangerous! He's a dictator, he shouldn't be in power!"

"Alright, you're the people, go do something about it."

"Ehhh..."

[–] DBosiers@social.vivaldi.net 14 points 1 day ago

@Absaroka Problem is most voting americans seem to be to dumb to spot it when there still is a choice.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Almost like these people should have voted for Harris then or some shit. Who would have known, right? 🙄

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›