this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
403 points (99.5% liked)

News

28981 readers
4128 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Releasing her doesn't matter, the message has already been sent, the intention is clear. To intimidate those that would defy their fascist operations. To silence critics that fear retribution. To say for all to hear, "if we can do this to a judge, imagine what we can do to you."

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 183 points 1 day ago (38 children)

Alternate Headline: Fascist Regime Attempts To Intimidate Federal Judges By Arresting And Releasing One

Fascism is here friends. Arm yourselves. Help arm others. Train. Help train others.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Dugan is accused of escorting the man and his lawyer out of her courtroom through the jury door last week after learning that immigration authorities were seeking his arrest.

Lady: You've got bailiffs. You've got the entire damn police force and courthouse staff at your disposal. Send the defendant into your quarters and tell him to lock the door, wait for ICE to come in the courtroom, raise your voice tell them to leave your courtroom, find them in contempt when they don't, and send them for three days. Tell the court staff to grab them. If they fight back, fuck it, game on, sounds good.

I'm glad she's trying to protect the rights of her defendant, and the agents who "arrested" her should clearly be in prison. She did good, no mistake. But I think she has a lot more leverage than she was acting with if she wants to decide to protect defendants. Trying to be sneaky about it is just going to feed into their narrative. There's a reason they cover their faces and try to snatch people quick and get out of the area. They know they're vulnerable. Feed into that.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Her bailiffs and police force are almost 100% on the side of ICE.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 3 hours ago

let me fucking do it then

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think it's more that they don't know what the fuck to do in this unprecedented situation and just defaulted to submitting to the "higher" authority.

At the end of the day, they were probably just thinking of themselves and not wanting to be arrested.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 19 points 1 day ago

Maybe. Maybe not. A lot of cops aren't happy about Trump pardoning everyone for assaulting the Capitol police, and violating everything they've been trained on how they need to do things in terms of "arresting" immigrants using ICE. She's in Wisconsin, so maybe you're right, but I still feel like her directly upholding the law using the position she has to tell bailiffs what to do would have been a better play. If they want to ignore direct orders from a judge, at least let's get that out there, and then we can figure out what to do at that point.

The truth is I'm just doing armchair analysis when I have no idea of the situation. That's how I see it though.

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Were the charges dropped or she is out on bail?

[–] Muehe@lemmy.ml 13 points 21 hours ago

Charges weren't dropped. Neither the judge nor the prosecution sought detention, so she is just out until the next hearing happens (May 15th).

From: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/milwaukee-judge-hannah-dugan-charged-with-2-federal-felonies-in-ice-case/ar-AA1DCrnR

On April 25, Dugan appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries during a brief hearing in a packed courtroom at the federal courthouse. Dugan, wearing a black dress with white flowers, made no public comments during the brief hearing.

At the hearing, Dries asked if prosecutors were seeking detention, and they said they were not. He answered that he did not believe that the charges were “eligible” for detention.

As it ended, her attorney, Craig Mastantuono, told the court: "Judge Dugan wholeheartedly regrets and protests her arrest. It was not made in the interest of public safety."

Dugan made her federal court appearance a little more than two hours after she was arrested at the county courthouse at about 8 a.m. April 25.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The article didn't explicitly state it, but she was probably released on her own recognizance. (In other words, she pinky-swore to come back for her trial).

Bail is just a tactic to compel the person to come back to court and face their charges by forcing them to pay a fee which they don't get back unless they show up. This lady is a judge. She is unlikely to disappear before her court date, because it would affect all the cases she is in charge of.

[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just a judge. An elected judge.

[–] ModestCrab@lemmy.wtf 20 points 1 day ago

MAGA: so a stolen election judge you say?

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

The MAGAt clown show continues.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to arrest the judge that released the judge that was arrested for shielding the immigrant awaiting trial from summary deportation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›