this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
344 points (78.9% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

8988 readers
53 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 117 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Cool, now get rid of the AI slop

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Generally in favour of that notion.

But I also don't think being able to communicate ideas visually should be strictly in the domain of people who can draw.

I can't draw AND Ii don't have anything worth saying so it isn't really an issue for me, personally. I just slap impact font on a carefully selected meme template, the way God intended.

Edit: Behold

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Now it's art

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even without knowing how to draw, couldnt you just take images from the internet and edit them together?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Aw yes because the effort is what matters?

That is why I tell loggers they should use hands saws. Chainsaws are really just cheating.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But I also don't think being able to communicate ideas visually should be strictly in the domain of people who can draw.

I was responding to that. I have no intention to argue why something so many people dont want to constantly see should or shouldnt be forced to be seen by those people

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think you got me wrong. I was just commenting down a chain of thought which starts with someone needing to have skill mastery to communicate art to someone who puts images together to do the same.

Where do we draw the line and is effort really the deciding factor or just an excuse for snobbery.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But this is unrelated to the comment you originally replied to

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just having a conversation here.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why not just reply to the comment that brought AI into topic?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As I explained I was expanding on a conversation. Do you have an opinion here?

It feels like you don't. If you don't have an opinion and don't want to talk I have nothing more to say.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does it matter if i have an opinion here? You brought a counterargument somewhere where there was no argument, which could be used as a manipulation tactic

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

It was just a comment. Did you know people come here to talk. I the Future, if you have nothing to say you can just say nothing.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Frankly, the problem with AI slop isn't the AI, it's the slop. We now get to see what all those "I have so many great ideas, if only I could draw, you'd see!" people's ideas actually are, and it's... this shit.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anyone can draw it just takes time and effort.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Can't draw" effectively means "don't currently have the skill" not "will never be able to", generally. If it would take hours learning a new skill to create one thing and if you don't have the available time to do so, then that's outside of the realm of a reasonable expectation, and thus effectively counts as "can't".

Nah lol I can draw this terribly in Paint easy peasy

Nah lol I can draw this terribly in Paint easy peasy

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No amount of effort or practicing worked for me. I don't know if it's some kind of visual issue, a mental issue, or what. I do have aphantasia, so that might be related? I cannot reproduce something I see. It's just like the data that make up the thing don't make sense in a way I can put it on paper,

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is really a teaching issue. There are several techniques that can train your brain how to draw. Arguably you may never be a great artist but you can definitely learn to draw with adequate results.

[–] erlend_sh@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m surprised these images make it so high up on Lemmy when this place is (rightly) so culturally opposed to the stuff.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They can be tough to spot.

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 10 months ago

but the Slop Sepia

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 months ago

The battle is lost (⁠´⁠;⁠ω⁠;⁠`⁠)

The arms race is real (⁠╯⁠︵⁠╰⁠,⁠)

Crypto is still bullshit ʕ⁠´⁠•⁠ ⁠ᴥ⁠•̥⁠`⁠ʔ

But AI is here to stay ʕ⁠ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ⁠ʔ

Yeah, I don't like it either (⁠⌐⁠■⁠-⁠■⁠)

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who's the artist that drew this?

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

AI counts as an artist now?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The US has been dealing with trade for about 250 yrs, China has been dealing with these things for over 2000.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

One could flip it around and argue that China has been bad at trade since they have been dealing with these things for over 2000 years and still aren't number one, even with 3-4 times the population of the US.

Don't misunderstand me, in the current situation China is absolutely acting in a more rational way. China are making friends. The USA are burning bridges, and more or less punishing their allies for their loyalty.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There's already a yuge poo

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At some point, it's just time to put in an embargo.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Trump already learned* the word "tariff", and now you want him to learn another?

*: Yes, I know he doesn't know the definition of "tariff", but he knows it's a word.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

"If I make the number big enough, China will eventually have to start paying the tariffs, right?"

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I always remember this.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Trump is handing over influence economic influence on China with this one. With China championing free trade, the (soon to be former) allies of US will become closer to China when it comes to trade.