this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
523 points (99.1% liked)

News

37375 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 139 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Gee I wonder where that money went… This just in: Narcissistic racist oligarch with a breeding fetish likely stole the money for his “legion” fund. Funny how both him and Epstein were obsessed with populating the earth with their progeny. Too bad only one of them is dead.

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The man is a thief, but there's nothing to steal here. He's lowering his totally bogus $ amount that he supposedly saved the government based on contract and lease cancellations.

Every single contract (~10) that I know very specific details about that was DOGE-cancelled has a problematic "savings" amount on the doge.gov website. Every one is wrong. That's just the 10 I know about where I have privileged information. There's currently more than 8000 listed. I suspect most of those have similar issues with the reported "savings" amount.

This is straight accounting that they are botching.

Nevermind that the $ savings is bogus even if the accounting was accurate. Because these cancellations are costing the US taxpayer big-time in the long run.

[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I appreciate your input and I acknowledge I’m being a reactionary jerk off. Thanks for doing what you do.

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's a place for you both. One can bring the needed anger, the other can bring the details in case we can ever get some fucking justice in this world for these fucking fascist fucks. Myself, I wish a painful death on each of them. (NSA: I'm not going to cause their deaths, just rejoice when they die. They are thieving evil scumbags)

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LemmySilverBot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you for voting. You can vote again in 24 hours. leaderboard

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, anytime I have been under an NDA it's been about boring, mostly useless stuff related to Canadian telecom stuff or upcoming Microsoft products since I work in print and deal with those companies. I wish I got to see stuff like what you get to see, probably way more interesting than knowing the Xbox 360 would use an amd gpu instead of nvidia or that carrier A's pricing strategy is to copy carrier B.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless you really care about 3080 vs 3600 funding or fixed price vs cost plus contracts, government finances aren't all that exciting.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Literally the only creative bone in the Republican party is the accounting side.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

IMO I doubt there's actually theft of the savings... there's some real chaos. but the savings numbers are all made up with no tie to reality. Moneys not stolen, because the savings were never real... dude's managing to shut down half the functions of the government, lay off hundreds of thousands of people... and failing to reduce costs in the process.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Read the article..

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 122 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are no “savings”. That was a cover story. This is about gaining access to data and firing anyone who might enforce rules.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 29 points 1 year ago

100% will cost more than it "saves" and result in a much less functional society.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Elon Musk, the de facto head of DOGE, lowered expectations of the group’s savings from $1 trillion to $150 billion by the end of the fiscal year.

So, a failure even on their own terms.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's going to have to move the goalposts to $10 to meet the expectations

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And even then the "savings" will be shortterm. Wouldn't surprise me at all if you could draw a straight line to a trillion dollars lost over the next 10+ years caused directly by DOGE.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the rate we're going, I fear that may be an understatement.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh I just mean directly costing us tax dollars that could've been used wisely but instead will be wasted trying to fix things doge fucked up royally. The loss this administration has already caused to the economy as a whole is incalculable. Even if the tariffs get reversed and we recover modestly that would still be many billions stolen from the working class' retirement and other investment accounts.

[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The original goal was 2 trillion. It's less than 1% of the original goal now.

Edit: Less than 10% which is still pathetic, but this is why I shouldn't do math in my head.

Math doesn't check out, but point stands.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

150 billion is 7.5% of 2 trillion

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I like how people think this or the sabotaging of social secuity will lead to privatisation.

Yeah they could do that - but they are not. There aren't any plans, secretive or otherwise. they are just wrecking things and leaving nothing behind.

The Replublican party is opposed to social security - private or public. They want you to work until you die. They have literally said this repeatedly for 100 years, what is there not to get ?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s weird. I thought he was making government more efficient to save taxpayers’ money.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gotta put the /s, especially lately that more conservatives have made the leap to Lemmy.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Put the /s there or dont. They're too stupid to function anyways.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Put the /s ~~there or dont.~~

FTFY

[–] spykee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

What a shite webpage. No matter how many times I close the tiny stupid video window, it will spring up like bloody herpes with every touch. Yahoo, you're as bad as herpes. Eat shit.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Presumably being used for illegal bribes

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Can't use made-up numbers for bribes.