186

Alt text: three panels with "fossil fuel vehicles" (full of traffic),"electric vehicles" (full of traffic), "walking biking & public transit" (peaceful city with people riding bikes and trams)

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 38 points 9 months ago

This is true. But just going from fossil to electrical vehicles will improve the air quality enormously and lower the noise a lot. It is a big improvement for city life.

[-] Serdan@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago

While that is all correct, I think it's worth keeping in mind that a lot of the air pollution and noise is from tires.

[-] ratzki@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 9 months ago

..and heavier EV with more torque generate more micros plastics than most cars with combustion engines. In general, biking and public transport are best.

[-] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 6 points 9 months ago

No doubt about that. All I am saying is that just switching to EVs is a great first step. I absolutely hope we start seeing more non-car cities in the future.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 9 months ago

The sound of the ice motor is negligible compared with the one generated by the wheels trapping and pressurized air under them at higher speeds. So, unless ev vehicles came with substantial reductions on speed limits, the sound they generate isn't going to change.

[-] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 10 points 9 months ago

At high speeds yes, not in the cities. Look at Sweden limiting the speeds to 30 km/h in cities, that plus EVs will improve city life significantly.

[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago

At the cost of destroying the earth, water and air of where the lithium mines are. But in that case the ones suffering would be poor brown people, so it's all right 😊

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

The best solution would be no cars, yes. But it takes time to change over from car-based infrastructure, and the environment gets damaged another way. If not from lithium mining, then from mining and burning fossil fuels.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

I really want cycling highways though. Like bike lanes are for commuting. Where's the lane for having fun? For cyclists, scooters, etc. 😔 this is still an unbelievably urban environment, too, and more integration of the natural environment would also be fucking nice.

[-] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

Okay, but you still need lorries and cars for goods and countryside dwellers, who need access to the city as well

[-] kimpilled@infosec.pub 20 points 9 months ago

Those things are still available, they’re just not the only option to the detriment of everyone else. Most people and things should be entering the city by rail, which removes the need for city destroying highways that are ever widening.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

well the first part is just plain false and the second is marginal: you can deliver things in cities by e-bike and very small electric trucks, and people on the countryside are first off like 20% of the population in almost every country but can also be served by public transport in 90% of cases.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
186 points (93.1% liked)

Lefty Memes

3801 readers
767 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such, as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries. That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry. The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals. We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals. Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS