this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
406 points (98.6% liked)

Academia

929 readers
5 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 136 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Between the House and the Senate, there are currently 258 Democrats in Congress.

And 224 of them are fascist collaborators.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Dems just making sure the 2 party system dies forever.

[–] ChaoticCookie@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago

When I said I didn’t want a 2 party system, this isn’t what I meant!

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago

Or maybe more accurately, the illusion of a two-party system.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 6 days ago

"No way to prevent this, say the Democrats who are actively collaborating with the fascists"

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 74 points 6 days ago (51 children)

The Democratic party is a party of cowards.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 days ago

Most politicians are cowards.

load more comments (50 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The dnc is controlled opposition. We have to get actual progressives elected at local levels and it’ll be a fucking process but it’ll eventually make the party actual opposition

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You'll have to throw Chuck Schumer into a retirement home (or a volcano) first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We've been doing pretty good at that in Oregon in the Portland area especially, we got a fair few DSA people elected to the city council and to the state house in the last election. Although I doubt that will ever really convert the Dems into an actual progressive party, it's a lot more likely that the Democratic party dies with the rise of new progressive candidates and new progressive parties winning.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

now it's on the voters to make some democrats disappear.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 39 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Lots of people are trying but it's not so easy to do. Our voting system is geared to only allow two parties and any actual third party that starts to gain traction gets shut down by the people with money and existing power. I don't think it's strictly impossible but I also don't think we can realistically pull it off. We need a solution outside the existing hierarchy imo

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 5 days ago (6 children)

They didn't used to be this way, for some reason under Biden they went super anti-immigration

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

"For some reason."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 30 points 6 days ago
[–] derryt@lemm.ee 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Sigh, I see I can't trust my senator to do the right thing anymore. Edit: meaning he didn't sign it. POS trader.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago

Just shows how cowardly the Democrats are now. Most of them were afraid to sign a piece of paper that means literally nothing.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 6 days ago

And to think, 2 months ago, 46 Dems signed, along with most republicans, the Laken-Riley act.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Only?

I know we talk a lot of shit about Dems but I'm genuinely shocked that many signed off.

load more comments
view more: next ›