this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
90 points (97.9% liked)

politics

22525 readers
3670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


President Trump on Thursday renewed a call to defund NPR and PBS a day after top executives from the public broadcasters faced an intense grilling from GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

“NPR and PBS, two horrible and completely biased platforms (Networks!), should be DEFUNDED by Congress, IMMEDIATELY,” Trump wrote late Wednesday on Truth Social. “Republicans, don’t miss this opportunity to rid our Country of this giant SCAM, both being arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party. JUST SAY NO AND, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform’s Delivering on Government Efficiency subcommittee peppered NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS President Paula Kerger on Wednesday with accusations of bias against conservatives and questions about their funding.

NPR took in just over $11 million in federal funding last year, money Maher said is crucial to bringing public broadcasting to local communities, particularly in rural swaths of the country.


top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darthoub@lemm.ee 34 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Anything that doesn’t spew hate is on the chopping block. PBS? Really? Sesame Street!?! Mr. Rodger’s neighborhood!?! Reading Rainbow!?! These are the threats to this weak, thin skinned regime?

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Yeah. Those programs teach kids basic life skills, kindness, and so on. They cultivate a love for learning.

This is fascist bullshit 101.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

If only these guys would ever focus there attention upwards they'd see much entitlement that needs fixing.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We helped pay for Sesame Street in the middle east because it's super effective pro-Western-Culture propaganda. Seriously can't have a better investment than we had there.

Oh the other children's programming is funded by generous support from...the Taliban...soooo, good job giving them a monopoly on kids minds? How you think that'll play out in 5-10 years when they are old enough for war?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago

These people view empathy as a threat to their existence (because it is). So anything that teaches children to empathize is bad in their minds.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly... NPR and PBS have already been starved of public funding for so long (talking single digit % of total operating costs), that I'm starting to think we'd be better off with it being entirely listener/viewer-funded. Is the table scraps they throw them worth this kind of headache? Especially with a president who will 100% attempt to interfere with their reporting.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Then they would cease to be public media and would just be another non-profit news organization/content producer

Also, federal funding is a tiny chunk of NPR and PBS, but the individual member stations that actually broadcast the stuff NPR and PBS produce tend to get a lot bigger chunk of their budgets through the feds (this is what they're talking about when they say the funding is "crucial to bringing public broadcasting to local communities")

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

This right here. My local station, radio and television, rely heavily on federal funding, because nobody in the south cares about it. I donate every month, but not everybody does.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Not necessarily. They could continue to be nonprofit and operate almost exactly how they currently are, just without interference from the government. Could even set up independent ethics boards and shit to keep them honest if people think it's needed.

I don't know enough about how member stations are funded I guess... So maybe I'm wrong.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, even if the man himself were still around to push back, they’d probably call him an “an tea fuh woke mind virus communist” or some shit like that.

I think, societally, this country is completely done. This is our final form, and I hate it with every bone and sinew in my body.

[–] Chappy@infosec.pub 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They'd twist some tale to tarnish Rogers for sure. Fucking insane. As to the latter part of your comment? I think you're right; I hope you're wrong.

I hope I’m wrong too. But I don’t think I am.