this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
282 points (97.0% liked)

3DPrinting

17312 readers
170 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been noticing an unsettling trend in the 3D printing world: more and more printer manufacturers are locking down their devices with proprietary firmware, cloud-based software, and other anti-consumer restrictions. Despite this, they still receive glowing reviews, even from tech-savvy communities.

Back in the day, 3D printing was all about open-source hardware, modding, and user control. Now, it feels like we’re heading towards the same path as smartphones and other consumer tech—walled gardens, forced online accounts, and limited third-party compatibility. Some companies even prevent users from using alternative slicers or modifying firmware without jumping through hoops.

My question is: Has 3D printing gone too mainstream? Are newer users simply unaware (or uninterested) in the dangers of locked-down ecosystems? Have we lost the awareness of FOSS (Free and Open-Source Software) and user freedom that once defined this space?

I’d love to hear thoughts from the community. Do you think this is just a phase, or are we stuck on this trajectory? What can we do to push back against enshitification before it’s too late?

(Transparency Note: I wrote this text myself, but since English is not my first language, I used LLM to refine some formulations. The core content and ideas are entirely my own.)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeTak@lemm.ee 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Many people don’t care about FOSS or don’t know the benefits, they just want a NOW working product. Many belief in the goodness that nothing bad will happen, and if something happens, they still can switch. I often have this discussion with other colleagues and friends, it’s an endless debate of price , features , comfort and support. As long as there is both on the market , why argue? People can buy what fits their needs.

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

My opinion on bad manufacturer behavior is: if we keep buying those products(with locked down firmware, Windows-Only Proprietary Cloud filled forked Slicers etc.) more and more manufacturers may go that route.

[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The problem is people's stinginess. They want to save money and buy from China. The manufacturers help themselves to the OSS community but do not contribute anything - on the contrary, the manufacturers undercut the OSS alternatives enormously. They have no development costs or anything else to compensate. So that the OSS solutions do not finance the development for other companies and push themselves out of the market, the only option is to lock it in. It's the people who want to get into an expensive hobby on the cheap.

Edit: example about developing stats.

PrusaSlicer

PrusaSlicer is our own open-source in-house developed slicer software. The PrusaSlicer team consists of 13 full time developers. As of January 2024, we spent a total of 145,720 work hours developing PrusaSlicer (that’s over 16 years of non-stop work by one developer). While only about 10% of the original code remains, we are still extremely proud that PrusaSlicer is originally based on the open-source project Slic3r by Alessandro Ranellucci. Each of the source files has a short header with the list of all contributors. We believe this is the right way to acknowledge whose shoulders we're standing upon.

PrusaSlicer is a completely free, feature-rich, frequently updated tool that contains everything you need to export the perfect G-code for your 3D printer. Today, the PrusaSlicer code powers most slicers on the market.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Prusa is based in Prague, and according to some quick googling the average software developer in Prague makes 88k CZK (~3800 USD or ~3500 eur), so about 526 CZK/hr (~22/hr in both USD and EUR).

Which means they've potentially spent around 76.7 million CZK (~3.3 million USD, ~3 million EUR) into their slicer. Just for salaries.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I wonder if any of that includes what are essentially firmware tuning for their printers?

I recently ran a set of prebuilt Prusa M4S for a printing demo, and they were really nicely tuned, between the pressure sensing head and the way it only probes the area of the print bed it’s going to use, all 10 printers worked pretty much out of the box. One roll of filament wasn’t sealed properly and clogged a few times, but I basically did around 800-900 hours of printing over the course of a week and had a couple clogs from that one roll.

I wish I could have kept one, but my OG ended 3 is still hanging in there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Luckily for us, the original RepRap folks were smart enough to go for copyleft rather than permissive licensing. As such, the common firmwares and slicers are both using GPLv3 code, severely limiting the companies' ability to do that.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a race to the bottom line. The endless plight of the working class: funnel-fed the products of each other's work for the price of obedience. Viva La Revolution, coming this fall everywhere you stream.

[–] LeTak@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Maybe a little out of context but this reminds me of the Sony Helldiver 2 situation. If people get loud enough they can infect change things. No one got loud or boycotted games that had Kernel level AntiCheat , this could have been avoided. Same with Bamboo I guess, if people still buy them after the Firmware and Cloud thing , it probably will happen again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We have become so normalized to anti consumer behavior it doesn’t even matter anymore

Like it used to be that a videogame manufacturer charged for a dlc that was already on the game disc, you had to pay to unlock data that you technically had purchased but not licensed, and people threw a fucking fit. Now it’s like “this new tech device will only work if you insert $20 bills every 30 minutes” and people are like “oh well that sucks but what are you gonna do? I need a toaster that can send me a notification when my toast is done”

Fuck the companies that do anti consumer bullshit, fuck the youtuber dummies that normalize it because they got $50 and a free shitty printer, fuck the government that has completely failed to regulate anything, and fuck the dummies who constantly enable this nonsense because they refuse to spend 10 minutes researching their purchases and instead spend the rest of their life in credit card debt because they have $1100 in monthly subscriptions to stupid bullshit that makes their stuff work for 18 months until the company goes bankrupt, their device is bricked, and they replace it with another piece of shit that has the same anticonsumer bullshit

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's just like everything else with technology. As soon as the "normies" start buying into it everything goes to shit. They don't know what to look for and just buy whatever's easiest. Once it gets that far the manufacturers can do whatever they want

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

All the Youtubers Bambu sponsors are like, "I was terrified of 3D printing. Wasn't that something only nerds do? Then Bambu sent me a free 3D printer and several hundred dollars and I'm telling you guys, you don't even need a brain to use it!!!"

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a three way street though. Lazy consumers are to blame for enabling but bad companies are worse for having anti consumer practices to begin with. And the biggest failure of all is our government for allowing anti consumer behavior to run rampant and not allow any meaningful regulation to go through because they’re utterly corrupted and pro corporation.

In the “normies” defense in a functional society I shouldn’t have to research every purchase I make to ensure it is not hostile against me. However, we live in a dystopia where it is necessary to either manufacture your own foss solution or research for the purchasable option (that is often just the least hostile but still fairly hostile)

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Agreed. It shouldn't be this way but it is and they should act as such. The consumers are the only ones who don't benefit from being corrupt pieces of shit so I think it's fair to blame them for enabling it. If they took a stand we wouldn't be in this mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Despite this, they still receive glowing reviews, even from tech-savvy communities.

I mean, most people don't care. How often do you see mainstream smartphone reviewers making a single mention of the insane amount of bloatware and spyware on phones, or calling out Apple for their unrepairable devices? Shit just blows over eventually and consumers accept it for what it is. 3D printers are not exempt from this mentality.

Jeff Geerling made a video today about how he bought a dishwasher that was top-rated by ~~RTINGS~~ Consumer Reports with no mention of the fact that in order to make it do a God damn thing, you have to connect it to the app, create an account, and connect it to them OEM's cloud.

Several years ago I bought a DJI action cam and it was the same thing. You can't do jack shit with it without connecting it to an app and creating an account. I watched dozens of reviews and this was never mentioned. I returned it but I'm sure 99.9% either don't give a fuck or accepted it.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thats not really a good comparison. Fist thing someone does when they buy a smartphone is replace the OS. Same as laptops.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think 3D-Printers have just this DIY image for me and that's why i thought the general 3D-Printer user is more tech-savvy and aware.

If they would tell me that my ESP32 needs cloud connection to use them i would be furious to.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

The industry is evolving. It happens in every industry eventually. When any one OEM corners a sufficient market size (like Bambu), they start taking freedom from the user to lock them into their ecosystem. Then all the other OEMs go "well if they're doing it I guess we can do it too". This is what you see trickle down from Apple all the time: headphone jacks, glued together devices, soldered RAM, and most recently unhinged RAM and storage prices, etc.

It's what you see in the smart home industry as well. A dozen different brands with zero interoperability because none of them want to compete on a level playing field, they all just want to lock you into their ecosystem.

It didn't seem to work for Bambu but they will back down and then try it again in another 12 months or make smaller changes. They just boiled the frog too quickly.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just wanted to mention, it was top by consumer reports. I don't think he mentioned RTHINGs but could have missed that.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Edited, thanks

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] waz@feddit.uk 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

I build an original voron 1.0, reused the parts to build a 2.0, and built that into a 2.4 with mostly newer parts because the frame was just fucked from all that nonsense. I have a very low serial from back when they did that on the subreddit, not sure if that’s still a thing

Even with the raggedy frame it was a great printer. But building it properly it’s bulletproof. Costly but if you want a forever printer that you can mod it’s the way to go imo

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

My 0.2 Parts are on the way.

Thought about buying the upcoming Sovol Zero but i guess its the time to build my first Voron :)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It is simply an entry level thing. You will find this in every market.

In a bike shop retail market I can sell you a serviceable bike for $500 that will last, or an $800 road bike you'll actually ride. Still the majority of bikes sold come from places like Walmart where they are made of unserviceable junk and are mostly nonfunctional. These are rarely ever ridden and often thrown away. In the shop I'll sell 20:1 on the cheapest model to the next options up the ladder.

It is strange to adapt to this kind of understanding at first, like just how skewed the real market is. I can target selling to clubs and teams but I can't touch the the garbage bike market where most people reside.

I think we are at a point where the influx of people into 3d printing are not real Makers or have any aspirations to be.

The reality is that people are often simply stupid. They seem to think that saving a few bucks here or there is smart but are not bright enough to see that everyone doing the same thing are buying the junk product over and over. There is nothing more expensive than being a cheap miser.

Ultimately, the only person that can fix stupid is ourselves. One can only inspire others to learn but can never force them. You cannot fix stupid in others. In the USA, stupidity is political currency and we have a long tradition of poor education and standardized exploitation. It is the American dream.

I think LDO and Voron are the only super relevant open source torchbearers.

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is it a price thing?

In my opinion Bambu Lab is a high-end consumer 3D-Printer and still modding, servicing etc. is bad. On the other side of the price-spectrum Anycubic copy-pasted all the bad stuff from Bambu.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not. It's the "premium" products that have this proprietary bs and branded parts trying to justify the inflated prices. The cheapest printers are all just generic clones with no lock in and mostly generic parts. Practically DIY kits only without the DIY unless something fails.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Free systems were expensive, hard to use, and had worse finish

Bambu came, made a better [proprietary] product

People obviously bought it

Then other manufacturers saw that they could sell proprietary products just as well and jumped into the bandwagon

[–] EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I love DIY.

At home, I run and build DIY printers but you can't deploy them in a business/production. Why? As soon as there is a printer that isn't it just works with easy (and documented) maintance procedures the business needs to hire not only a worker but a worker who knows 3D printers. That's bad.

Printers like the Sovol SV08 and Biqu AMS (still not launched) aren't just there yet.

Combined with the BambuLab pricing on the A1 mini and P1S it is pretty difficult to buy FOSS.

Prusa is close with the Core 1 but they don't have an good AMS package for their printers (their MMU lacks a enclosure/easy to deploy setup). They propably know it but don't have the answer avaible.

Equally on the econmics side it is difficult: The BambuLab P1S killed the (FOSS) market.

If I compare a 1150€ BambuLab X1C against the 1350€ Prusa Core One I would likley prefer the Prusa product/ecosystem. With the P1S it suddently is 700€ compared to 1350€ for a machine that will produce the exact same parts with a near identical cycletime, uptime and opperating/maintance cost. The decission in favor of BambuLab is easy.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This. The proprietary 3d printers arent the "enshitification" of 3d printers, they're what's finally going to make them go "mainstream".

Tech people need to remember how deep into these hobbies we really are, especially compared to "normies".

Its like with computers, people go "oh well you can get a better bang for your buck on your memory by not going with apple!". Which sounds great and everything until you remember that people don't know what memory is or what it does, let alone how to buy new memory, or how to disassemble a computer, or where the memory goes, or even why more memory can be good for you.

I compare it to fabric crafts because I don't know shit about them. I know (well, think) fabric is sold in bolts and that's about it. Hell I don't even know how much a bolt is, and we haven't even gotten to the different types of fabrics or ways to utilize them.

The vast majority of people don't want a 3d printer hobby, they just want to 3d print stuff. And the Bambu printers are as close to that as I've seen so far.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

The vast majority of people don't want a 3d printer hobby, they just want to 3d print stuff

Exactly, I like to design things and be able to manufacture them at home. I have absolutely no interest in thinkering with hardware (especially dangerous one like a 3D printer)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Holy shit. There is so much gatekeeping here that Cerberus themselves would say "Yo dog, take it down a notch"

I think there are two big aspects to this.

The first is that, yes, we are seeing a big push toward locked down ecosystems. Bambu is a great example of this and people are still falling all over each other to talk about how amazing their products are. And, as someone who has been pointing out that AMSes don't actually do what people think they do for years now, it has been frustrating to watch them take over the cultural zeitgeist even before the current bullshit.

Which leads into the second aspect. FDM printing is very much a "prosumer" hobby. It is about taking industrial/corporate processes and marketing them to hobbyists. Some of that is awesome because it provides a platform to rapidly prototype and iterate on new tech (which benefits the companies more than the users but...) and some of that is miserable because it means we have astroturfing campaigns out there to explain to people why they NEED 24 AMSes chained together for their single printer... because that model works a lot better for print farms.

And, as an aside before I get to the "real" point: We see the same with home cooking. There was a MASSIVE push that everyone should sous vide everything for a couple years. And.. that was mostly because we had restaurant chefs talking to The Masses without a Food Network/PBS producer telling them to shut up. So OBVIOUSLY the best steak you will ever eat is the one that spent 11 hours in a hot water bath and was quickly seared to be plated in under 5 minutes. Rather than the understanding that this is a crutch used because a line cook can't spend 10 minutes butter basting their steak.

And most of that still is incredibly obnoxious and outright wasteful. But it also led to people like J Kenji Lopez-Alt who used that to popularize "reverse sear" cooking.

So, now to the real point. People are gate keeping mother fuckers. They are angry that they had to read twelve different articles to figure out what "the paper trick" was rather than having a printer having an automatic tool that kind of gets you... probably closer than you would have gotten anyway. And countless other pain points that were resolved because... they were pain points.

And people decide THEY are heroes and legends rather than realizing that people like Naomi Wu et al came before them and got it to the point where it was learnable for the hobbyist sickos.

Which... not to shit on the OP TOO much (I would not be surprised if this came out of the LLM pass) but it is why I more than side eye anything that has "Make them great (again)". Because, invariably, it is a case of people yearning for a time that never actually existed where they are on top and everyone bows before them.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I just want a printer that doesn't require you to upload your gcode to their cloud server before getting permission from them to print.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I just want to make clear, im not against printers which are accessible, i think i myself didn't had enough different devices to call myself an expert of any kind.

I would just wish that it would be news worthy if you need to use a specific slicer(specially if near all of those proprietary slicers are only made for windows) to make full use of your printer or some clarification that all your prints will be send to the cloud before they reach your printer.

Im much less a 3D-Printing-Purist then a privacy advocate. I wish that this type of behavior by manufacturers will be out-called - never-mind if it is a 3D-Printer, your Dishwasher or any other "Smart Device".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Some people want to 3d print for a hobby, while some want 3d printers as a hobby. You are the second type, while out of the box printers are for the first type.

Personally what kept me away from 3d printing my own terrain for miniature wargames is that I don't have time for another hobby. I just can't be bothered with endless fiddling with settings, temperatures, speed, and all that. But I understand your feelings

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeTak@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They try to keep it as simple as possible so that really everyone can start printing if they like to. For our luck, we got companies like Prusa and Creality that still allow modifications and have a big community.

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I would name Sovol as a good and cheap producer. The plain Klipper(or on older Devices Marlin)-Firmware is really nice :)

Isnt the Creality-K* Lineup also locked down?

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

The K1 has root access and you can use whatever slicer you want. They are probably not the best machines if you want to install plain clipper though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 week ago

If you want to, you can still have a completely open-source printer. You can even build one yourself with some expertise needed. I guess the enshitification is part of the wider audience those manufacturers seek. It wouldn't be necessary, but it seems this is the way they go.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Btw most would rather read your own writing rather an ai. When my students edit with ai it’s typically pretty obvious and I think it wastes everyone’s time. Also, foreign students frequently write much better than the native English ones at my school, idk why. I bet your writing is better than you think :)

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know, i just had issues to put all my thoughts together in a way that it is still readable/understandable so i gave the AI a try. In the end, it didn't really change that much but gave it some structure and nicer wording.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
  • this is what going mainstream looks like. Greedy people see profit and they get in.
  • greedy people are often sneaky, and they work to take all the can from open and close it in : Apple, Later Redhat
  • there are tons of Open Open printers out there
  • Open has a problem - it's hard to maintain ignorance and get the benefit. It requires work - you can't just easily trade dollars for someone else's labor. You have to learn and put things together to really enjoy.
  • What can you do?
    • This is hard, almost impossible: Don't do business with people you suspect or know are cruddy. Even if they say they have what you want.

    • Learn how to build the printer you want. Hire a good person to learn and do it for you.

    • Buy a printer from a company that pledges to do right. Even if it costs more.

[–] Paradox 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's giving me serious pause when looking at things like the new Bambu printer

I really like my x1c, but I haven't upgraded it's firmware yet, and probably never will, because the local features are just too good. I know I can replace a lot of the bambu cloud features with octoanywhere, but I shouldn't have to

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zypp@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

I suspect an important angle, at least for Bambu Lab, is AI. That's why they are selling printers with expensive Lidar units at a competitive price (the X1C). The Lidar data adds a key part to AI training sets: print outcome. They could use this to train more AI models to improve their own products. I believe this is why they are first pushing the firmware update to X1C models.

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I own a BambuLab A1M as I want a printer that just works. And while yes it is all proprietary they do sell replacement parts for most parts.

While I will not forgive them for their latest moves I am quite happy, I turn it on, load an stl into BambuStudio and let it run without any issues at all.

My next printer will however probably be a prusa as they are Europeans and I love that they keep everything up to the user so far. But I can not deal with anything that is more DIY than a Prusa, it is a tool for my hobby...not the hobby itself.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they do sell replacement parts for most parts.

If you can't replace all of the parts with some other off the shelf part, regardless of quality, then you're locked to a brand and are at their mercy.

What happens when they inevitably discontinue the A1M and no longer sell parts for it?

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That will be a shitty day. But the alternative is that they don't sell replacement parts at all. To be fair we don't even know how they treat discontinued products as all their printers are still in production.

Still my point stands, Bambu printers simply just work, I took my 15-20 minutes to set up and it did run flawlessly since then with only the maintenance the printer asks me to do. I can understand why people like that. This would be possible by opensourcing everything but somehow except for Prusa there is noone else who strikes that balance between ease of use and openness.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›