this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
283 points (97.6% liked)

politics

22117 readers
4018 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

Love it or hate it: having a litter of children works. You can neglect them and a few might make it to adulthood.

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

4/5 kids survived. Those are great numbers if you’re living in the 19th century.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Help! I'm trapped in a shit hole country and surrounded by moronic assholes.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 16 points 10 hours ago

So she's a child murdering monster. Got it.

"Pro-life" I'm sure.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why you don't vote idiots into the white house. Imagine this quality idiot dictating policy.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You'd better avoid FDA news for a while😬

[–] bblkargonaut@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

People like this should be treated the same as parents who drive their kids without car seats and seat belts.

[–] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago

How this isn't abuse is beyond me. They'll screen about personal freedoms, but what about that poor child's personal freedom.

I hate that we let parents treat kids like property.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

CHD and Kennedy have relentlessly spread dangerous misinformation about the safe, lifesaving MMR vaccine, including that it causes autism (it does not) and even deaths (it does not).

So much better that she just died rather than got autism and then died.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

As if autism is the worst thing you can have, come on... That's actually offensive af of them to even say. I have autism and I'd rather have it than be dead, any day.

[–] Rainbowsaurus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

There are definitely days I'd rather be dead, but that's not the autism's fault, it's morons that believe in this shit.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 97 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The denial after the fact is a necessary coping mechanism. Otherwise, they will suffer from the guilt of killing their child.

Which they absolutely did.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll probably come around to the realization in time, but we won't see that interview.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

She's figuring out why families 200 years ago had a dozen kids.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 5 points 10 hours ago

Not really. She didn't learn shit.

She gets to hold her dead child who could have had a full life thanks to modern medicine and pretend like she's the victim.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The most generous way I can look at this is to say she's in denial. Five unvaccinated children with one dead. Apparently a 20% fatality rate (in her family) is not enough of a reason to get the vaccine.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The most generous way I can look at this is she's a danger to her children, and they should be removed from her. Rejecting vaccines should not be a choice, just like choosing to starving your children should not be a choice.

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If she got bit by a rabid dog, she'd get the vaccine in a heartbeat. Anti-vaxxers are only anti-vaxxers out of pure spite for science and the government. That's literally it. Willfull ignorance and contradicting personalities in defiance of the status quo. If the disease has a low risk of them or their loved ones dying, they'll take the risk of not taking the vaccine, because they suck at math and it can't possibly happen to them and their family.

If the risk of death is 100% (like in rabies), they'll take the vaccine, because they know deep down they are fking wrong about vaccines and they don't want the 100% chance of death.

Btw, If you ever debate with an anti-vaxxer irl, asking them if they'd take the rabies vaccine once bit by a rabid animal does fuck up their stupid logic quite effectively.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There was another story the other day of a father whose unvaccinated daughter died of measles, and he said he was still glad she didn't get the vaccine because he didn't trust what's in it to be safe. These people's minds are not functioning rationally.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Iirc that was a Mennonite. Not that or makes things better, but they're a weird cult, even for weird cults. Electric Amish.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I assumed this is the same family. If not, measels may be doing it's thing.

[–] Rainbowsaurus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Measles is insanely infectious. People have no clue the fire they're inviting into our lives. Even vaccinated people are at risk.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 46 minutes ago

Yes, so often we see people online saying "Ha ha, let the morons get COVID/measles/bird flu/etc!" They don't stop to think about the risk to everyone else, particularly vulnerable people some of whom can't get vaccinated and rely on herd immunity. In all these years still that lesson doesn't seem to have been learned. I suspect the people saying this are healthy young people who haven't really considered how different from theirs some people's lives are.

[–] Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're chronically stupid.

[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Terminally stupid in this case.

[–] JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network 16 points 1 day ago

More like homicidally stupid.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago

Wild that you're just allowed to be a child murderer if you claim the magic voices in your head say it's okay. You'd think that the surviving kids would be saved from this kind of fucked up ideology, but in the U.S. we have concluded that it's more important for people to be delusional.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a 20% mortality rate. If vaccines had anywhere near that level of mortality risk, all the streets of every city in the world would be absolutely fucking littered with bodies. You have to be one dumb motherfucker to think this is some kind of vindication for your antivax position.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Well, the existence of these people are why the trolley problem is a problem at all. They think it's more ok for 5 people to die by them not doing anything than 1 people dying instead because of their involvement.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Crazy that anti-vax has even a fig leaf of personal liberty as a defense. Yes, you do have the right to make your own choices and you can be a negligent parent in 1000 different ways.

But this isn't even close to a personal freedom issue. You being a dumb piece of shit is a direct threat to the rest of society. YOU don't get to make the personal choice to kill MY child.

It should be simple for these serious diseases: unless you have a certified medical issue preventing it, you have to get the shot. Fuck any objection (personal, religious, whatever...). If there's some negative side effect or a bad vaccine batch, you get generously compensated for our collective societal fault in harming you.

Strap them down and jab them, let them bitch and moan about everyone's children being alive and healthy later.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Either that or, more gently, ban them from public spaces if they haven't had the vaccine -- schools, public administrations, grocery stores, malls, churches...

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 1 points 6 hours ago

This is the approach I would suggest. I do not agree with forcing people to take vaccines, but if they want to be part of society then this is a reasonable requirement. It's simply an extension of the duty of care principle we already have for healthcare environments where vaccination and other measures are required for people to work in.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mine got the shots. They are ALL fine. And alive I might add. Fucking ghoulish cunts, protect your kids dammit.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago

have they detected 5g signals from them, these antivaxxers always claim something like that.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Woman who doesn’t use conventional birth control is shocked to discover this one weird trick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aiden@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

She probably claims to be "pro-life" too

[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Considering she just aborted her child post-birth, she's in denial.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 13 points 1 day ago

Gotta keep having kids if you're going to let them die like this or disown them when they turn out wrong. Arrows for the quiver of god, or whatever. That poor child deserved to live a full life.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

... This isn't an onion article. That's horrifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Poor child.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What a shitty mother. I feel sorry for her other children.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 9 hours ago

There is a good chance she made 4 more future antivaxers

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Parents like these deserve a bolt right between the eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other words, irresponsible parents who should not raise kids in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

These fucking people are ghouls.

Edit: Christ, those times when I fail as a parent, all I need to do is read about this kinda bullshit. Holy hell. I cannot contemplate this attitude to the preventable death of one of my kids.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure vaccines make measles more than 80% survivable so she’s missing out

load more comments
view more: next ›