this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
299 points (98.1% liked)

politics

21089 readers
3463 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

look at this quasimodo lookin ass troglodyte. his body is even more fucked up. white supremacists who think they are pure and worthy of preservation are always the fugliest, most rendering error looking types ever.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

So what was in the calendar? Can't see the article with an addblocker.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a dumb story, there's nothing of interest on the calendar.

In January, Sennott attended a 15-minute meeting on DOGE recruiting. Less than two weeks later, he attended a meeting instructing "special government employees" (Musk's official designation) about the federal ethics rules that applied to them.

That's it.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

sounds like they couldn't come up with 5 bullet points

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aren't these guys supposed to be...clever?

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, they're supposed to be fall guys.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Only the best people...

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 day ago

DOGE is not yet an official federal agency authorized by Congress.

not yet? could we fucking not?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Completely competent geniuses.

So stable too

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago

In January, Sennott attended a 15-minute meeting on DOGE recruiting. Less than two weeks later, he attended a meeting instructing "special government employees" (Musk's official designation) about the federal ethics rules that applied to them.

Ethics rules? Never heard of them.

[–] AceStructor@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Only commenting on the picture: this guy always looks like he wants to give me candy from his van.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So, I've seen this "centibillionaire" title a few times, but I believe it should be hecto(a?)billionaire if I have my metric prefixes correct.

E.g. a centimeter is a hundredth of a meter, so a hundredth of a billion is 10mil.

Shout-out to !anythingbutmetric@discuss.tchncs.de

Or maybe I'm out of the loop on the joke.

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I totally would agree, except we're using "billion [dollar]" and not "gigadollar", so I think we're already not using a metric term in the first place. It sounds to me like "billion" comes from Latin, and "cent-" as a Latin prefix would mean 100x, so my layman's understanding is still satisfied with "centbillionaire". Totally interested if I'm missing something, though.

[–] sepi@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Centi is divided by 100. Hecto is multiplied by 100.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's how it's used with metric prefixes, but in other contexts you have to take into account the original meaning of the latin word. Centum means a hundred.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

In the roman context, a single centurion would be 1/100 of an army grouping.

But since we aren't living in roman times, one cent is 1/100 of a dollar.

Language is inconsistent in it's usage of cent, so at best the term centibillionaire is confusing. Hectobillionaire has only one possible meaning, so if we're inventing new words, probably should go with the option that's more precise.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Centi still means one hundredth. https://images.app.goo.gl/PpoMdsfakk26179w7 You don't know latin.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Centi is used in different ways, see centipeda, which means hundred-footed, not one hundredth of feet.

I do admit I'm not a native speaker.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Century, centennial, centipede, etc.

[–] sepi@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, that's how the Metric prefixes work, that's already established. This is about other contexts where it can go either way.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

But 1 percent is 1 per 100.

[–] JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Decitrillionaire

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But 1 percent is 1 per 100.