this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
323 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

2895 readers
1270 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dear everyone,

Please stop accelerating an arms race which puts thousands of objects into low earth orbit.

Sincerely, Astronomers

[–] uraniumcovid@lemm.ee 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

dear astronomers, we hear you, but you are not the priority when it comes to making sure a country can fight back against oppression and fascism. also, oxygen is not a metal in general, unless we are talking about very specific pressures and temperatures of course.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago

Oxygen is not hydrogen. Therefore metal.
In fact hydrogen is a metal as long as it's not undergoing fusion.
Lithium - metal.
Helium, believe it or not - metal. It's pretty much just lithium anyway.
Look, can't we fight back by shooting starlink down instead of sending up more and more until the sky is just a cloud of (actual) metal?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good. I hope everyone moves to these new alternatives, and puts starlink out of business. Same with Tesla and EVs.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boycotting Musk services is the easiest thing I have ever done!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Yeah I almost feel bad I didn’t have to do anything.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and EVs

I don't think going back to fossil fueled cars should be the route to go. There are a lot of other manufacturers of good EVs outside of the USA.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, I meant people should be buying their EVs from other companies.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

THIS is what it took to replace starlink...

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The EUs IRIS 2 Programme has been in the work for way longer. Once the importance of such a satelite network was realised EU started drafting plans for their own network

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

oh i didnt mean as in making a replacement, i meant as in getting one in Ukraine's hands

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's be real, it's a musk product, it won't be difficult to do far better and likely for much cheaper.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That just seems wrong. The one thing Musk actually is relentless about is the cost-cutting, often at the expense of reliability, safety and security. Musk has literally cut the entire development aid agency of the US, which does save a bunch of money in the short term, before it predictably comes back around as US international influence lost and waves of new diseases.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Cost cutting ≠ Sales Price cutting

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Fair point. But even so, SpaceX, parent company of Starlink, has competed rather successfully with national/supranational space agencies in terms of cost.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago

That, I can't deny.
They managed the cheapest space missions in a high cost country.

[–] fikniefnadjofullinn@feddit.is 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm glad we're working on replacing starlink, though AFAIK IRIS² won't be ready until 2027 at the earliest.

I do think that with the increasing use of LEO satellites for drone control and the general breakdown of international agreements and institutions we're seeing, the moratorium on weapons in space will not last much longer. Every player will work on anti-satellite systems to deny command-and-control links to the enemy.

The anti-satellite weapons we have today are mostly focused on taking down single satellites, and would not be practical against these mass swarms of LEO satellites. We'll probably see a revival of ideas like EMPs in orbit to knock out large batches of satellites all at once. Obviously such a weapon would be indiscriminate and would take down everything within the blast radius.

[–] gajustempus@feddit.org 9 points 23 hours ago

...and as IRIS² was supposed to launch with SpaceX, but thanks to Musk-madness we'll stick with Ariane, VEGA and so on, Arianespace/Airbus can't believe their luck right now.

They've been WAY behind SpaceX and their price offerings, but with the far-right moron Elon shitting around like that, the only rational choice is to launch with our own (old, low-performing) launch systems.

Another reminder: We HAVE to push development in so many sectors we've neglected in the past. Same goes for Social Networks. Mastodon and Lemmy are nice, so is pixelfed. But we need an OpenSource, Europe-hosted and -controlled Facebook alternative as well. And we need a proper replacement for PayPal and Amazon for and by Europe as well.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 3 points 23 hours ago

Just as a sidenote: The UK/French OneWeb by Eutelsat is supposed to be ready later this year. So at least there might be another system ready faster...but yeah, LEO problems are still there.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Has SES done LEO satellites before? They seem like the obvious people to do this

It’s not much aside from a good start. But small steps still get you where you need to be.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

Before 2025: GOVSATCOM will rely on existing national satellite communication systems and accredited private operators.

After 2025: Existing satellite communication systems may be complemented by additional dedicated space infrastructure